User talk:BlitzGreg

This is my talk page, go on leave me a message.

Archives (1)

no archives yet (create)

Your recent editing history at YoYo Games shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically YoYo Games, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. See WP:NFCC#10c. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan2: I am failing to understand why you continue to comment this photo out from articles. I was not the one who uploaded it but it was approved through the upload process with fair use rationale. I've also clarified the rationale on the photo. Can you please elaborate? BlitzGreg (talk) 21:40, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As stated above, the file violates WP:NFCC#10c in that article. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan2: Can you elaborate as to exactly why and how it violates that policy other than just regurgitating an edit summary? BlitzGreg (talk) 18:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As there is no fair use rationale for that article, the image may not be used there. The image also seems to violate WP:NFC#UII §6 as the software already has an article and WP:NFCC#8 as the section easily can be understood without that image. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Teamwork Barnstar

I saw your 'thanks' on the Unity article so I looked through your history a bit. I saw that you are the one who added this. I just wanted to let you know that I had read that Mono article the other day and it inspired me to do all the other research and writing that I did in the last few days, about the WWDC award mentioned therein. This article has a ton of potential because Unity is such a world-class breakthrough product that has likewise enabled and spawned so many others. I am wanting to counterbalance the tone of accolades and promotion and primary sources, with more objective secondary sourced facts. To really state the case why exactly this is so notable amongst all others that could ever exist. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 20:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Smuckola: Thank you very much and you have my support, the Unity article is certainly improving and I wish you the best of luck! BlitzGreg (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good to see a wikipedia page about our game. If you need help to finish this page, please let us know. contact@fourflash.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anchor.wiki (talk • contribs) 20:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anchor.wiki: The most important thing for finishing this article is additional reliable sources. If you have some links to some third party news announcements and stuff regarding the game that is not directly affiliated with your company, I could certainly use them to improve the article. Also please remember to sign your comments on Wikipedia with four tilde's ~ BlitzGreg (talk) 19:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the following review should be also mentioned: ww2gameshq 7/10 pts Timelines-AOA will be released on iOS, and Android platforms in this year around february. --Anchor.wiki (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to be aware of and possibly join in: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 121#MOS:IDENTITY clarification. Skyerise (talk) 06:37, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Godot logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BlitzGreg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BlitzGreg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:GameMaker: Studio games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Comanche Box Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Video RTS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 23:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]