User talk:Billymac00

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Billymac00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. I don't know why this was placed, as you can tell from my edit history, I am a legitimate longtime wikignome. Could my laptop have a virus???? Billymac00 (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account isn't blocked. If you are hit by an IP block, you'll need to tell us the IP address to look into the issue. If you prefer privacy, WP:UTRS is available. That said, it seems more likely that you're using some strange proxy server than that your laptop is infected - no guarantees, though. Huon (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC) I hope you see this. I have the screenshot, it says IP 216.252.198.54 blocked by User Bbb23. I am not savvy on the stuff you talk ok. I just want to be able to edit again. I couldn't even reach your talk page, the block message comes up.[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

18:11, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)my background includes some knowledge about the following: Webb Institute, Wisconsin, bilinear transformation/IIR filters, post-tax investing, control systems engineering, number theory, and chess engines among other things.

User_talk:Billymac00/Archive 1

User_talk:Billymac00/Archive 2 made Jul 2 2008

I now have a wiki page: [1]

11/07/2008 I just submitted an OEIS sequence related to the number of symmetrical prime pairs as a f{primorials} ...very interesting ...info on my wiki page

Hi - I posted the section with the same name on my talk page. Could you take part in discussion ? Thanks ARP Apovolot (talk) 20:55, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

>I am curious what code do you use to validate? Pari? Mathematica?

Pari

>as you know the form (r^2-s^2)=t! does have solutions (7,5,6)

Above "troika" (7,5,6) cited by you does not correspond to any value of "n" in my conjecture

   n! + n^2 = m^2 

If you suggest that n=3 then 3! + 3^2 = 6 + 9 = 15 If you suggest that n=4 then 4! + 4^2 = 24 + 16 = 40

So what "n" did you have in mind ? ;-)

>see this link, speaks directly to your 1st posed question >(3e)" ...Prove that n! cannot be written as the difference of two >integer squares if >and only if n = 2 or n = 3 ..."

No - it doesn't speak directly ... They are different ... Barbeau's

n! + l^2 = m^2

is not requiring the left side (each of two members) to be the function of the same "n" but my conjecture n! + n^2 = m^2 does ...

Barbeau's therefore has two solutions (for n = 2 or n = 3)

while my conjecture has the only ONE trivial solution

n = 0, m = 1

0! + 0^2 = 1

Alexander R. Povolotsky My alternative email is apovolotATgmail.com Apovolot (talk) 02:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted A156053 which shows the proximity of the Bernoulli Number denominators encountering Twin Primes (adjacent to). Here is the related Wikicommons image: [2]. Note Y is log scale, 202 pairs encountered in 1st 15000 BNs.

Ok, image posted at: [3]. I personally think it shows the beautiful structure of the primes. A second image [4] illustrates a prelim relationship with the Twin Primes, though the dataset is limited.

Images for these are now here: A117825 [5]. A005846 [6] The former relates to Highly Composite Numbers and the offset to the nearest prime. The latter is the classic n^2+n+41 using the prime numbers for n ...

The article List of Wolfram Alpha functions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The number of functions could be extremely large, hence this list could only ever be a woefully incomplete. Calling these functions is also confusing. See WP:STAND

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salix (talk): 17:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I have posted you a message here! Amada44  ^{talk to me} 10:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		I hereby award you the Minor Barnstar for all of your excellence in cleaning up typoes, addressing other grammar issues, and using descriptive edit summaries. Your efforts are appreciated! Wear it with pride! Royalbroil 02:45, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for those suggested additions at Talk:Glossary of computer chess terms. So far I'm the only one who has edited that page, so if you have the time and inclination to add any items yourself that would be great. Otherwise it's good to have recorded ways that the page can be improved. Quale (talk) 07:33, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of people from Bakersfield, California may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Vendetta Red]] - Rockband (Joseph Childres (drummer, singer)
• *{{dmoz|Regional/North_America/United_States/California/Localities/B/Bakersfield}}{dead link}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Billymac00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I hope you see this. I have the screenshot, it says IP 216.252.198.54 blocked by User Bbb23. I am not savvy on the stuff you talk ok. I just want to be able to edit again. I couldn't even reach your talk page, the block message comes up. I have a gmail account for conversation if that helps.

Accept reason:

I consulted with another CheckUser and there is a possibility you are using this IP legitimately. I've therefore given you the benefit of the doubt and unblocked. Sorry for the inconvenience.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The IP 216.252.198.54 indeed was blocked as a colocation webhost that effectively serves as an anonymizing proxy. Such proxies may be blocked on sight, as happened here. Bbb23 may want to check whether reducing the block to anon-only might suffice. Huon (talk) 18:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:List of prime numbers, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. JBL (talk) 18:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]