User talk:Bagunceiro

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Add sources Edwin Brock Brazilian military government Regions of Brazil Kapaa High School Afonso Pena Northeast Region, Brazil Cleanup Politics of Brazil Brossard Ronson (company) Expand São Paulo (state) Index of Brazil-related articles Getúlio Vargas Unencyclopaedic Portuguese Brazilian Race and ethnicity in Brazil Lèse majesté in Thailand

Wikify The Wrythe Media of Ireland White Brazilian Orphan Antônio de Barros Carvalho Yeda Pessoa de Castro João Pimenta da Veiga Filho Merge Colonial Brazil Hackbridge History of the Jews in Brazil Stub Francesc Xavier Bultó Vice President of Brazil Pedralva, Minas Gerais Café Filho Delfim Moreira, Minas Gerais Sistema Único de Saúde

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the revert - I clicked when I shouldn't have clicked (distractions!! ...) Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Denisarona: Been there, done that ;-) Bagunceiro (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bagunceiro. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Henrique Bernadelli, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Henrique Bernadelli to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, TheMagikCow (talk) 18:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chamber of Deputies (Brazil) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't make much sense to call any Brazilian city both "a town and a municipality". The way it was written, it seemed like "town" and "municipality" were two different things, or that it is possible to be a "town" or a "municipality" in Brazil. However, Brazil is officially divided in states and municipalities, so that's why I've been changing thousands of articles that were wrongly created following this formula:

"Name of the city is a town and municipality in the state of...".

The correct definition of any Brazilian city is "municipality". We have no "towns", the closest word for that would be "city", which is a generic and frequently informal term for any city in the world. Victão Lopes ^Fala! 02:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Angra Nuclear Power Plant page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bagunceiro, I updated all of the images of the states so that they looked more modern and standardised. I'll be happy to take any considerations about changing the colours if you had any. Santiago — Preceding unsigned comment added by SantiagoFrancoRamos (talk • contribs) 08:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although I appreciate your good faith on the article, the previous version was misleading, I'll mode the discussion from Twobell's talk page to the article talk page. (N0n3up (talk) 18:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thankfully another editor is working on the article now to source it. Hopefully you will do the same. In the future, please don't remove prods [1] unless you are also going to improve the article. :) - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 19:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CorbieVreccan:, suggest you read the instructions at WP:Prod. Specifically:

" Any editor (including the article's creator) may object to the deletion by simply removing the tag; this action permanently cancels the proposed deletion via PROD"

"To object to and therefore permanently prevent a proposed deletion, remove the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from the article"

and also

"Proposed deletion (PROD) is a way to suggest an article for 'uncontroversial' deletion"

Or even just the text of the "PROD" itself:

"You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason."

Bagunceiro (talk) 20:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Hi. Please have a look at Boomer Vial's edit history - a concerted campaign to add as many American actors as possible to these articles as he can, regardless of notability, and he's even doing it in alphabetical order. Deb (talk) 19:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mensalão scandal page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are incorrect - the island of Ireland is not British and the pound sterling is not the currency in the Republic of Ireland. Regards Denisarona (talk) 04:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Denisarona: The island of Ireland has nothing to do with the case, and the republic even less so. I assume you must be confusing the term British Islands with British Isles; a different thing altogether. United Kingdom is incorrect in this case since the sterling zone includes (as shown on the map) the Channel Islands and Mann; neither of which are part of the UK. I suppose it might not be a bad idea to spell it out as "the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Mann" or similar, but that is a bit wordy. Bagunceiro (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You undid my revision suggesting the Home Nations of the UK each have their own national day, why? St. Andrew's Day, St. George's Day, St. David's Day & St. Patrick's Day (with the possible addition of the anniversary of the Battle of the Boyne for certain communities in NI) are national days - in the traditional sense - of Scotland, England, Wales and (all-)Ireland respectively. I'm not precious about this edit, just curious about your revision. On what basis do you reject this notion? - R160K (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@R160K: Well, simply because, with the exception of St Andrew's day, they are not "national days". They are the feast days of the patron saints but that is not the same thing. Bagunceiro (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]