User talk:Andysmith248

Hello, Andysmith248, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Qaei ☎ 18:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of nicknames of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of nicknames of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom was changed by Andysmith248 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891283 on 2018-01-15T20:00:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Justin Webb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Was the recent move discussed anywhere beforehand? Deb (talk) 14:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was not. Andysmith248 (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think it might have been slightly controversial? Deb (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see that you have moved Huw Edwards to Huw Edwards (disambiguation). Are you suggesting that the journalist is a primary topic and intending to move Huw Edwards (journalist) to Huw Edwards? If not then we should probably revert the move to avoid leaving a malplaced disambiguation page. What do you think? Certes (talk) 22:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, I do think the journalist should be the primary topic and Huw Edwards (journalist) should be moved to Huw Edwards. Andysmith248 (talk) 09:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. The journalist certainly first comes to my mind but I would suggest starting a RM as it may be considered controversial. Certes (talk) 15:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have now requested that Huw Edwards (journalist) be moved to Huw Edwards on the Huw Edwards (journalist) talk page. Thanks for your suggestion. Andysmith248 (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime I have changed the disambiguation page back to its original state. Andysmith248 (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Shephard (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Whispering^(t) 16:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mel Giedroyc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxford High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Amol Rajan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Channel 5

David Shukman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to St. Pancras

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/jan/16/bbc-david-shukman-science-editor. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, mozst of the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Chris Tarrant: Extreme Railways may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elliot Graham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Claremont High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Evans (journalist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 23:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Moulder-Brown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Stepmother (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Being the spouse of someone does not equate to notability. We need coverage of him (in-depth) unrelated to his marriage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Konecki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon Konecki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My Life, Our Times, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Bryant (journalist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs a few more news sources from WP:RSP (avoiding The Sun and other tabloids) to indicate reception, also history of the broadcast and home media. Series appears notable enough otherwise.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Tarrant: Extreme Railways and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chris Tarrant: Extreme Railways, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Tarrant: Extreme Railways, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:16, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bradley Walsh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Chase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——SerialNumber54129 19:30, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Craggy Island, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

– Ammarpad (talk) 08:48, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When You're Smiling (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

– Ammarpad (talk) 10:27, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Noel Stockdale has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Richard Block (businessman), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. This article is a BLP and all information should be referenced, so please add citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Damian McBride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating My Life, Our Times.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

While the subject clearly meets WP:NBOOK based on the results of an internet search, note that the references currently listed are insufficient for demonstrating notability: the only actual independent coverage are sources #4 and #6, and #6 is the Daily Mail, which is generally not considered a reliable source (see its entry at WP:RSP), although it's perhaps acceptable for book reviews. At any rate, I'd suggest citing more reviews, both to clearly establish that the subject meets notability guidelines, and to also flesh out the article a bit more.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Premiership of Boris Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Nahal^(T) 11:27, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Webster (journalist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

1990'sguy (talk) 13:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In a Winter Light, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hitro talk 12:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Mason (journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Mason (journalist) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Walsh & Son: Breaking Dad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unite to Win. Since you had some involvement with the Unite to Win redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zion Lights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr Broccoli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Broccoli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lopifalko (talk) 18:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Simon Konecki, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I want to ask you about this addition of text you made to the Nigel Farage article. The way the information from the sources was summarised was incorrect in a number of ways. It is particularly critical in a biography of a living person that what we write is factual and correct, or that at the very least it is faithful to the sources given. Could you have a look (it's from a few months ago so you probably need to refresh your memory) and get back to me here please? Thanks. Oska (talk) 16:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you tell me what is specifically wrong with that edit on the Nigel Farage article. From what I can see I moved some of the text around and added the info that Farage confirmed he was living in Chelsea with a French politician, which is what the two sources say that are quoted. Andysmith248 (talk) 20:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that I put his house down as worth 12 million instead of 4 million, so yes it was a mistake on my part. In that edit I took the Independent's word that he was sharing the property with Ferrari. Andysmith248 (talk) 21:10, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your replies and sorry for my delay in getting back to you.

Yes, the two things you mention in your second reply are the things I wanted to address. The 12 vs 4 million mixup is the first thing I picked up on. I thought it was just a simple matter of vandalism (typical vandalism to change a figure in an article) but then found it was introduced right at the start, which I found peculiar. On the second point the quotes from Farage are only that that person was staying at the house, yet your text read that Farage 'confirmed' that she was sharing the house with him. There's a significant difference in the two words and what they convey and we need to be fair to the subject of the article (whatever the Independent goes on to speculate) in faithfully reporting what he actually said.

I don't mean to sound officious but it might be a good idea for you to review the guidelines under Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons Oska (talk) 06:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• (talk page stalker), just reiterating that just because information does exist, that doesn't mean it has to be included. Agree with Oska here re BLP. Cassianto^Talk 08:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After first correcting the text, and then after further consideration, I've acted to remove the text altogether for being only WP:BLPGOSSIP. The diff is here. Oska (talk) 00:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Richard Block (businessman), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:IVD GIF.gif

Happy International Volunteer Day. Every Wikipedians are volunteers and you deserve this recognition. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Abishe (talk) 05:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cliff Michelmore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Burke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Downsizing (book), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 03:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Block".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 12:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi! Thanks for wanting to contribute to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, it appears Konecki isn't notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. The majority of coverage about him is about being married to Adele - not about him specifically, like profiles, interviews and articles written just about him. I can't access the Financial Times article, but the Management article I was able to view is an essay he wrote about his day-to-day activities. If there are other publications or media out there just about him - not Adele, per se - then we're all ears. Thanks!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Konecki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon Konecki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Humphrys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classic FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri controversy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 19:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 coronavirus pandemic in Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri story is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri story until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thangam Debbonaire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Premiership of Boris Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248

Thank you for creating National Television Award for Special Recognition.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Note that other editors have called for additional sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- DeFacto (talk). 15:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that wasn't an attack page in any way. Andysmith248 (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Simon Konecki, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simon Konecki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emily Sheffield, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Emily Sheffield, the new editor of London's Evening Standard, left British Vogue as part of what was called a "posh girl exodus"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emily Sheffield. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Emily Sheffield), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - it looks as though we're finally close to a consensus on Talk:Times Radio but we're awaiting your input. Could you give us your opinion please? GDBarry (talk) 20:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just replied at bottom of page. Andysmith248 (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Wasn't the response I was expecting - looks like more fun and games! GDBarry (talk) 21:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure does, the talk length is looking pretty heavy now. Andysmith248 (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GDBarry, will you be returning to work towards a conclusion on the talk? Andysmith248 (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as above, we're close to a consensus but it would appear GDBarry isn't happy about your opinion. I full support your opinion that the list should remain as it is. I only agreed to the removal of the list to keep the peace, but as you can see from the onset of the debate, I would give my full support for the list remaining on Times Radio as it stands, with no further names being added unless they have Wikipedia articles that comply with WP:GNG. - Funky Snack (Talk) 10:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will continue the conversation with you over on the article talk page so we can carry on to work to a proper resolution. Andysmith248 (talk) 21:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Personally, this has gotten WAY out of hand. People disagree over articles, but I've never known anything like this just because non-notable people can't be added to lists. I give it less than 24 hours before certain individuals become involved. I've been accused of harassment. Hilarious. I almost spat out my tea when I saw the accusation. - Funky Snack (Talk) 21:58, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've not been involved with contentions as convoluted as this either. It seems an issue so minuscule that it shouldn't have warranted editors going through the agony of following sections and sections of talk page discussion, accusations of harassment, etc. Andysmith248 (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree! - Funky Snack (Talk) 22:13, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask for your input and for you to put your side across in the dispute resolution? - Funky Snack (Talk) 22:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was not able to contribute to the dispute resolution as it was closed just before I logged on today. However, I have said on the talk page that I would also like the RfC to be closed. Andysmith248 (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dominic Grieve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrats.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

To show that it is not just a news story, provide continuing coverage of the event like references from August or later.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dominic Cummings scandal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dominic Cummings scandal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Neil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2019 general election.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Andrew Neil Interviews".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bibliography of Boris Johnson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sasha Swire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Swire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 18:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rory Stewart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jenny Ungless has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I was actually surprised by the dearth of in-depth coverage for this politician/businessperson. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The BLP Barnstar
		For maintaining neutrality in biographical policy matters whilst persevering with the article Dominic Cummings scandal. SpookiePuppy (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SpookiePuppy, thanks! Andysmith248 (talk) 01:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why don’t we use Prime Minister’s official portraits on the premiership articles? But the President of the United State’s Presidency articles uses official portraits. Can I get some clarity? Ciaran.london (talk) 23:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ciaran.london, all the UK premiership articles, from the Premiership of David Cameron to the Premiership of Gordon Brown, use a portrait that is both unofficial and taken during the prime minister's time in office. Andysmith248 (talk) 12:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where’s the consensus? Ciaran.london (talk) 21:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of autobiographies of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of autobiographies of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect West England and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 27#West England until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 04:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"secretary of state for energy and climate change" [sic] redirects to the (correct) capitalised form - thus. (Reference here). So I don't understand why you thought that change was necessary. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ghmyrtle, "the then secretary of state for energy and climate change" and "the deputy leader of the Opposition" are not capitalised. Please see MOS:JOBTITLES. Thanks. Andysmith248 (talk) 14:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems utterly crazy to me to give precedence to WP editors' preferences over the correct job title, but there you go. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Incidentally, there is nothing at MOS:JOBTITLES with which I disagree. So, the issue seems to be your interpretation of it. "Louis XVI became King of France and Navarre...". Equally, Huhne was Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andysmith248

Thank you for creating Jonathan Munro.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thank you. Andysmith248 (talk) 10:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Sunderland (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrats.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your edit has removed a key source from the Intro. that put an end to a debate over the subject's full name. Would you please reinstate it at 'Early Life' otherwise we'll be back to square one. Thanks, Billsmith60 (talk) 21:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andy, sorry, I see the birth source is in Early Life in full – sorry! All the best, Billsmith60 (talk) 21:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Billsmith60, no problem! Andysmith248 (talk) 21:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Benjamin Butterworth (journalist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Butterworth. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Belfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- GA Melbourne (talk) 10:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Owen (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sue Owen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Nick Clegg's tenure as Deputy Prime Minister is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:48, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BoyTheKingCanDance: Thank you. Andysmith248 (talk) 10:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on the referencing in Michael Gove. Universal SFNs are not easy. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tim O'Doherty: Thank you very much. Andysmith248 (talk) 09:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keith Shannon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Shannon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice you've been adding {{Talk header}} to lots of pages. Please can I ask you to carefully read the guidance on the template about how it should be used, at Template:Talk_header#Should_this_be_added_to_every_talk_page? - specifically "This template does not need to be placed on every talk page, and should not be indiscriminately added to talk pages using automated editing tools."

Please can you let me know what criteria you're using for assessing whether you think a talk page needs that header added, and assure me you're not using any automated tools to add it? WaggersTALK 14:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Waggers: The guidance I have been following is from the same page you referenced, which says that "Talk pages that are frequently misused, that attract frequent debate, articles often subject to controversy, articles that typically attract new editors, and highly-visible or popular topics may be appropriate for this template." The instances where I have added the talk header have been such pages. I can confirm I am not using any automated editing tools to add the template. Andysmith248 (talk) 18:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, just saw lots of similar edits on my watchlist in a short space of time and thought I should check it out. :) WaggersTALK 08:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Whitting, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Whitting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sebastian Payne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Payne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PlateOfToast (talk) 02:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]