User talk:Al-Andalus

Hello, Al-Andalus. You have new messages at Nomoskedasticity's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Archives

1 - 2

Before posting: a bit about Al-Andalus

He's been contributing to the Wiki project since mid 2004. He is an Aussie by birth, and a flag-carrying one at that. He has affectionately been called a mutt due to his ethno-religious origins. He's been to every continent on the face of the earth. He is fluent in several world languages.

While he does have, and has never denied having, strong opinions and views of his own (as you may already know) which might be considered contraversial by some - perhaps even "horrifying" if in stark opposition to the mainstream political or other mantra of any of the ethnic and/or religious communities he was born into - he does contribute to the Wiki project independant of said opinions and views. He may even contribute content going against his views, if that is what fact supports, while still maintaining his right to personally dissent in the belief of said fact.

He recognises everyone's freedom of speech and thought, and recognises every person's value as a human being.

TALK PAGE CONTENT

Your continual non-consultative and deceptive changes to the image disappoint me. Timeshift (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've already hit an effective 3RR through reversions. Please hit the talk page instead of reverting again. Michael ^talk 05:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reported. Michael ^talk 06:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 fortnight in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

—slakr^\ talk / 06:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your contribution about the reasons Nelson's response was controversial, was important, see discussion. Can you find a source which summarises the controversial content, to use as a reference?--Funkarama (talk) 22:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cantor_Joseph_Cysner.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 03:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I care about what the sources say, not some political agenda. And if you have any more insults, please keep them off my Talk: page. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 07:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that other fellow continuously vandalizes the page can you please let me know. I have reviewed the recent history and can see that an anonymous user as well as someone trying to smear the article with Arabist propaganda have been causing problems. We should remove the photo of Moussa al-Sadr and Michel Aoun as it's not about politics, would you agree? Take care!

--Eternalsleeper (talk) 16:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		El Sombrero Barnstar Award
		You deserve this award for contributing to content of interest to the Latinos WikiProject. Outstanding contributions are generally about articles pertaining to Latinos and/or Hispanics in the United States as well as articles about Latin America. LatinoMuslim 02:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why doesn't Equatorial Guinea show up on File:Map-Hispanic countries.png? Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 03:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, aclarando algunos puntos no omitiré aseveraciones personales sobre lo que piense o no de Chile u otro país latinoamericano. Wikipedia no es un foro ni tampoco una fuente primaria para elaborar nuestras propias tesis.

por consiguiente, recibes advertencias constantemente por tus intervenciones caprichosas y segadas sobre artículos etnograficos de todos los países lo que te valió un total de 6 bloqueos hasta el momento, lo mío son correciones simples la primera por citar a la embajada de Rusia, en una fuente la cual hacia referencia al censo de Uruguay y Chile. La segunda por citar "cóndor travel" una web que daba apreciaciones ligeras sobre los países pero nada más, lo cual fue un complemento de la misma.

Volviendo al tema etnografico de Chile, la referencia cual se cita de la estructura racial dice claramente 30% de blancos caucásicos, 65% de mestizos de predominancia blanca (eso no es más que castizos) los mestizos tradicionales no tienen aspecto blanco es más, se acercan más al fenotipo amerindio en la mayoría de los casos. Lo mismo en el caso de la CIA (White and White-Amerindian), claramente dice blancos y mestizos.

Ahora respondiendo a tu pregunta si conozco Chile?, soy un conocedor de Latinoamérica y también de los temas etnograficos de dicha región acá te dejaré algunos artículos que te aclararan un poco porque el tema castizo de Chile lo diferencia con otros países "mestizos" de la región como Paraguay, Colombia, etc.

• 1°Al parecer tienes que leer este name=> estudio. Dice que en las clases medias cual representa el (40% de la poblacion chilena), hay 23.7% de sangre amerindia (o sea, 'castizos'), mientras hay 37.1% de sangre amerindia (3/8) en las clases inferiores. En las clases medias altas y superiores, la mezcla amerindia no sobrepasa 12.5%. La población chilena incluyendo todas las clases sociales no tiene más de un 25% de mezcla amerindia y 75% europea. La mayoría de los chilenos son 'castizos' no mestizos.

• 2°En los estudios de los tres principales genetistas de Chile (Spotorno, Rothhammer, Valenzuela), todos de la Universidad de Chile, se concuerda en el texto "Cultura e identidad étnica" (rev. médica de ciencia) un 30 % de la poblacion tiene bajo o nulo aporte Amerindio y un 5% es mayoritariamente Amerindia, con minimo o nulo aporte Europeo. Esta revista, de circulación limitada, tiene muchas de sus publicaciones en scielo.cl donde aparecen una serie de artículos sobre mestizaje, identidad y adelantos en los análisis de genética humana. Se supone que en los próximos años ya habría mayor certeza en lo relativo a los procesos de mezcla en América (incluyendo Norteamérica) En ese sentido, la antropología genética ha estudiado poblaciones específicas en todo Chile con resultados dispares. Sim embargo, lo que se podría homologar con el promedio de mezcla en el mestizo fenotípico (65% de la población) cuyo promedio se aproxima al 70% europeo/ 30% indígena según estudios de Spotorno y la Universidad de Chile que es más especifica la cual divide la población chilena en un 30% de blancos caucásicos, un 65% de mestizos de predominancia blanca ( castizos) y un 5% de indígenas name=> Estructura racial.

• 3°En Chile no hay una división racial estructurada, no se puede calificar de "mestizo" a secas porque esa palabra tiene una connotación cultural. O sea, al hablar de "mestizo" no se habla de la mezcla racial en algún grado sino que básicamente de la mezcla entre amerindios y europeos en una contribución similar (puede ser 50-50, 55-45). Si quieres ver la dimensión práctica del término mestizo, los norteamericanos tienen una cantidad de trabajos enormes sobre el tema y voy a tratar de recuperar algunos que revisé tiempo atrás para mandárlos.

• 4°Ahora revisando la composición étnica de Argentina da una mayoria del 88% a la población caucásica. Mientras que investigaciones genéticas realizadas sobre individuos seleccionados al azar, han detectado algún legado hereditario indígena en más del 56% de la población de Argentina. name=> Estructura genética de la Argentina. esto se explica porque se hace referencia el fenotipo, mismo punto que te recalco.

Eso es desde la visión genética (genotipo) de la población chilena, la cual según todas las fuentes "conocidas" consultadas seria mayoritariamente de origen castizo.

Ahora desde fuentes que miden principalmente los fenotipos de las poblaciones podemos determinar los siguientes resultados:

• 5°La CIA junta a casi la totalidad de la población chilena (95%) en blancos y mestizos name=> www.bartleby.com

• 6°Otro estudio más específicos como el elaborado por la UNAM (2005) da un 52,7% para los blancos en Chile name=> Composición Étnica de las Tres Áreas Culturales del Continente Americano al Comienzo del Siglo XXI.

• 7°Esteva-Fabregat daría más de un 60% para la población criolla o blanca en Chile, el cual se hace referencia en el estudio antes mencionado.

• 8°Por otro lado, García Zarza (1992), daría una mayoría blanca para la población chilena name=> Argentina, Chile y Uruguay, su población está formada casi exclusivamente por una población blanca e blanca mestiza procedente del sur de Europa, más del 90%.

• 9° Another study conducted by Jose Flores Garcia - History, Modern.- In Peru, one of the oldest countries of occupation, while the Amerindian are 54% population and 32% Mestizos, white of Spanish origin barely reach 12% and are fewer blacks and Japanese. Something different is the situation in Colombia - white 20%, Amerindian 2%, mestizo, 58% black, 4%, mulatto, 14% - and in Mexico, white 15%, Amerindian 30% and mestizo 55%. Brazil, for its part, has only a small population with Amerindian (0.4%), 53% white European origin, recent extraction, especially Portuguese, Spaniards, Italians and Germans, 34%, mestizos, and its very important to black people in the past, now limited to 11%, reaching a high percentage of black (22%). Finally, Argentina, Chile and Uruguay, its population is composed almost entirely of a white population - over 70% -, Spaniards and Italians for the most part, besides some minorities of Jews, Levante (Syrian Lebanese Armenians) and Central, mostly Germans, arrived mainly after 1800, ranging between Aborigines and a seven percent.

• 10°Finalmente, un estudio mas minucioso de los países de Latinoamérica arrojaría los siguientes resultados: La población de Hispanoamérica se suele dividir étnicamente en ocho zonas. Una indomestiza, con predominio de indios, representada por Guatemala, Ecuador, Perú y Bolivia. Los indios son un 40 ó 60% del total de la población; el resto son mestizos y blancos. Hay otra segunda zona indomestiza, pero con predominio del mestizo. Es el caso de México, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua y Panamá. Los mestizos en estos países representan un 60% de la población, siendo el resto blancos, indios y negros. La tercera zona, la blanca, la representan Costa Rica, Argentina y Uruguay, donde casi la totalidad de la población es de origen europeo. Chile y Paraguay son países hispanomestizos, ya que su población está compuesta de mestizos y blancos. En Chile predomina el grupo blanco y en Paraguay el mestizo. Una quinta zona es la negromulata que abarca Haití, Jamaica, Antillas británicas, Antillas holandesas, Antillas francesas y Honduras británica o Belice; el 40 ó 90% de su población es negra, el resto mulata y blanca. La zona hispanomulata, con predominio mulato, se limita a la República Dominicana, donde la mayoría de la población es mulata, mientras que la zona hispanomulata con predominio blanco es la de Cuba y Puerto Rico, donde casi un 70% de la población es blanca, y el resto mulata y negra. Finalmente, la zona octava es la híbrida del Brasil, Colombia y Venezuela, cuyas poblaciones están compuestas de elementos muy variados.Hispanoamérica.

Con los primeros estudios que cite sobre la genética, queda bastante claro que el mestizaje chileno es castizo, no mestizo si fuera así seria parejo entre carga europea y carga amerindia (50/50 o 55/45), al contrario de lo que dices tú. Cambiaré lo que redactaste sobre la composición étnica de Chile, porque son opiniones tuyas que no se acercan a las fuentes citadas cual cae en muchos errores porcentuales y de reacción lingüística inadecuada a la situación Contemporánea de Chile. Cordiales saludos--Kusamanic (talk) 14:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)--Kusamanic (talk) 14:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, please try to avoid multiple-minimal edits like your recent ones at Hebrew Alphabet (which make monitoring tedious), rather keep checking and improving the preview until you're satisfied with the result and only then save it. Thanks, Dan ☺ 10:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for your efforts in improving the article. In case you intend to expand the article, i just want you to know that i have posted all the links i could find about Tsvi and his work in the facebook group "The Engagement Movement". You can find them there. Regards, Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 07:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't forget to source the info that you add into the article. Thanks. Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 10:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i would greatly appreciate it if you could source this para that you inserted?

He states it was a topic which was spoken of openly until relatively recent history, much as the Egyptians or Lebanese are aware of their origin in the ancient Egyptians and Phoenicians respectively, and speak of it even if it arouse the passions of those who wish to stress or de-emphasize it. As with other "Arabs", the origin of Palestinians also became a relegated issue over time, but for them, the additional emergence of Zionism in the early 19th century constituted a competing national interest not directly affecting other "Arabs" (although Arab nationalism would serve as a counter-force vis-à-vis Zionism), and so the topic of origin became admonished, then transforming into outright hostility as a blemish of liability following the establishment of modern Israel by world Jewry, to the Palestinians' detriment.

Regards, Santiago Matamoros 09:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, dude. I have already sourced it. Santiago Matamoros 21:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Gilo, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Furthermore, please note that it is considered good practice to always provide an edit summary when you change an article, particularly when you make major edits to the content and information within the article. Please review WP:Edit_Summary for more information. Thank you, Breein1007 (talk) 23:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps rather than continuing reverting the edits of others on the subject of race relations on this and other articles, you would be more effective if you discussed the problems on each article's talk page and reach consensus. This looks like a classic WP:Edit War. Toddst1 (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes no correspond to describe the Demographics of Chile or Chile as a nation, not even for ethnography (Greek ethnos-εθνος, "tribe, people" - and graph-γραφω, "I write" - literally "description of people") is a research method of social and cultural anthropology that facilitates the study and understanding of a particular socio-cultural field, normally a human community with its own identity. It is based on interviews and observation (participant observation is the most important), with the field work a basic tool in the research process. "It has to do with the study of culture or cultures of a population, not its composition "racial" or phenotypes and genotypes. That should be encompassed under bioarchaeology or physical anthropology or "study population", but in no case in an article of population or demography. Therefore, I ask that you refrain from changes and opinions as this 1):The only reliable sources regarding the ancestral origins of Chile's population are genetic studies, and all of these, thus far, indicate various majority figures for Chileans of admixed origin, in varying degrees of European and Amerindian admixture. 2): controversy: 35% Amerindian with traces [around 1%] of other admixture." the top 1%?, You are manipulating sources.3): Large listing on their "disputes" and "inaccuracies", though I assume in good faith, but copiare this same message in the corresponding talk page, so that agreed changes and to avoid an edit war, for now return to the information origin. Ccrazymann (talk) 01:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be engaged in a slow edit war at Chile, particularly with your insistent replacement of [content without consensus]. While the three reverts rule specifically limits the number of reverts allowable per day, its intention is to prevent edit warring of any kind. Even a slow edit war, if it goes on long enough, is grounds for a block. If you disagree with the contents of the article, please discuss the matter on the talk page, not in edit summaries as you repeatedly revert the change. Ccrazymann (talk) 05:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You also appear to be initiating an edit war in Chilean American. Please reach concensus on the talk page before making and reverting contentious edits. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 13:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You removed references, and provide no support for you contention. A careful read recognises that the 48% is talking about all hispanics in the US, not only Chiliean ones. The paragraph is poorly worded, but your changes made it little clearer. You have also not discussed the issue on the talk page before reverting a forth time. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chilean American. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. . You violated it with this edit. Furthermore, you haven't discussed these changes on the articles talk page--Work permit (talk) 00:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was posted on my talk, but I think meant for you (not sure if you were watching) Clovis Sangrail (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Al- Going by the same pattern edits that you have made to Articles about White Chileans all over the place you are POV pushing with a clear agenda and is using WP:SYNTHESIS to push your agenda like you did here [[1]] and are doing at all articles that have to do with this population this is clear violation of WP:NPOV and the previous policy not to mention you have been edit warring as well--Wikiscribe (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Chilean American. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

For the complete report of this case, see WP:AN3#User:Al-Andalus reported by User:Clovis Sangrail (Result: 48h). EdJohnston (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

seems to me that you have never been to chile

by the way, the universidad of chile is a middle low class university in every aspect, very much related with population of any king of indian ancestry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dezdez1984 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read Cruz-Coke's article, and in fact he is generalizing, because the object of the study is not about determining the genetic-racial composition of Chile, if not, to explain the cause of some genetic diseases. That leaves the statment of general racial admixture of 2/3 white and 1/3 mixed to interpretation. For exaple, in the high income group, if we take a sample of 100 people, 91 would be white, and 9 mixed; of that amount of people, probable 80 is fully white, with spanish or other ancestry, and 20 would have a darker skin. What i am trying to say basically is that genetically you cant say that the whole bulk of population is mestizo, with different amounts of racial admixture, because in fact if you walked through the streets of Santiago everyday you will see there are big differences between people, more than to say that 99,99999% of Chileans are mestizo.

Why do you think the other 10 sources Kusamanic named say what they say? Are they "liars"?

I think you should quit making statements that don´t concern you, about a country youve probably never been on.

Diego Echeverría Santiago —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dezdez1984 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety ^talk 06:12, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I notice that you are are one of the editors of the Zambo article. I strongly dispute the content of this article and lay my arguments with sources in the discussion page of the article titled: Zambo has nothing to do with mixed people.

Thanks 86.176.170.210 (talk) 14:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Falafel [[2]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Veritycheck (talk) 01:21, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please assist, we have users trying to remove content, including bbb23 the editor who removed your edits! Step up now and say that you want to keep the criticism section as it is valid, or keep allowing bbb23 to "Own" the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LifeEditorLatinAmerica (talk • contribs) 06:38, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Temple Emil.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Snooki, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hispanic American and Gypsies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arab citizens of Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arab people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Alef

Samaritan Hebrew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Assyrian script

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arab people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sedentary and Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sephardi Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rabbinate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ashkenazi Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sephardi Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Oro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of Jews in Kurdistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Jews in Kurdistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 22:17, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sephardi Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Llerena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sephardi Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Criollos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro Cieza de León, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Córdoba and Llerena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laron syndrome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assimilation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Christian, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Goldberg and Berber. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Racism in Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Residency. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sephardi Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Freund. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zera Yisrael, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sephardic Bnei Anusim

added links pointing to Sierra, Assimilation, Identity, Goldberg, Rabbinate and Family tradition

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sephardic Bnei Anusim

added links pointing to Lineage and Sages

Eating live animals

added a link pointing to Unlawful

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdoms of Israel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sephardic Bnei Anusim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intermarriage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sephardi Jews

added links pointing to Minority and Plurality

Spanish and Portuguese Jews

added links pointing to Spanish and Ladino

Sephardic Bnei Anusim

added a link pointing to Mexican

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peterson and Pires. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User,

As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 12:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited America Ladina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adjectival. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Griffin McMaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pescado frito

added links pointing to Spanish and Andalusian

Cuisine of the Sephardic Jews

added a link pointing to Iberian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tawhid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 5-alpha-reductase deficiency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bottleneck effect. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Procesión del Señor de los Milagros.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jewish languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ladino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sephardic Bnei Anusim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Criollos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gospel in Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syriac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cloven hoof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regurgitation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Al-Andalus. You have new messages at Talk:Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations.
Message added 04:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CaroleHenson (talk) 04:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CaroleHenson. An edit that you recently made to Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It's so nice that you're interested in the topic, but the many of the edits have been unhelpful, especially where summarized content that is fully sourced is replaced with content that is not fully sourced. In addition, we're working against a request to have the article deleted... and the talk page discusses ways in which we need to be inline with a number of guidelines to make this a viable article. I would love to help, though, work together better. Perhaps you can take a stab at writing material in your sandbox and then we can work together getting it edited, cited, summarized, etc. for the article? CaroleHenson (talk) 09:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I started User:Al-Andalus/Trump sandbox for you and moved over all the info about the beauty contests and the Jane Doe info. I also left the tags that provide information about how to edit the section. I am happy to help out, too. Please let me know how I I can help or if you'd like suggestions about next moves with the content.--CaroleHenson (talk) 09:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and made comments to the sandbox page, based on your posting on my talk page. Sorry to shout in bold. I'm so beat and trying to get to bed, but I would have preferred to format fonts in blue, etc.... I just need to research that first, I haven't done it in awhile. Maybe you can think blue... or a lovely color of your choice when you see bold? Talk to you later!--CaroleHenson (talk) 13:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're still very interested in Donald Trump, which I am glad to see. Someone reverted this sentence:

"After being pressed on the question multiple times by second presidential debate moderator Anderson Cooper, Trump's hesitated eventual denial on the moderator's third attempt of whether Trump had ever engaged in behaviour amounting to sexual assaults against females as boasted about in the recording led to more accusations by several women that Trump sexually assaulted them being published days later."

It seems that there are several sentences in here and it's wordy, but I think you're trying to get to something like:

"After being pressed multiple times with the question of whether Trump had ever sexually assaulted any woman, Trump finally on the third probing stated that he has not sexually assaulted anyone"

which was added by someone at the Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations.

They did a nice job of something I skipped over entirely. Anyway, hope that helps. If you'd like to move that sentence and its source, I bet that would be appreciated.

Hope you're having a good day!--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I know that you've got a great interest, which is good. However, your edits end up being more disruptive than helpful, particularly when they: contain info that is already in the article, particularly long-winded, and not well cited. I again recommend the sandbox approach, just to get rolling. Once you get a hang of these concepts, it will be much easier. CaroleHenson (talk) 23:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I am happy to work with you, but rather than just taking it on myself, I'm going to post the content here that needs work to remove redundancy of what's already in the article, properly position the content, and summarize for brevity.

Thanks,--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I get your interest, but I've already mentioned the importance of not removing citations from content, keeping it concise, adding cited info, etc. If you're going to add content to the middle of a sentence, you need to make sure that it's covered from the source. CaroleHenson (talk) 15:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CaroleHenson (talk) 03:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• In the talk page today we discussed not adding extraneous information - like what Trump said about the accusers, etc. and to keep the article focused on the accusations. See Talk:Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations#The Henson Proposal. I have offered to help work through additions and said what is wrong with the content and there continue to be unhelpful edits, so I posted a warning.

• In this case, adding additional sections and getting into every drop of news coverage is beyond the scope of the article.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CaroleHenson (talk) 04:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I don't think you mean to, but it appears that there are a number of times when you made edits that you're inadvertently overwriting information that had been edited for improvement - or overwriting information that was correctly formatted, written based upon a specific source - and then overlayed with another source. For instance, last night I was working on cleaning up citations and two of them have been reverted to where they were before I edited. It looks like we were both in the Recording controversy and October 9 debate section around the same time.

Is it possible that you may be making edits where instead of typing information into the edit window you're copying information into the window?--CaroleHenson (talk) 06:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Al-Andalus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Al-Andalus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Faithless elector revolt in the United States presidential election, 2016, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lepricavark (talk) 16:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamilton Electors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton Electors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 02:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Joe Mixon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You added unsourced, potentially defamatory info after I had deleted it. [3] Veggies (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-- I've reverted your edits in Sharia for a couple of reasons. First, this is excessive and verbosely expressed detail for a lead which is already near the normal limit. Secondly, you've introduced changes in sourced text which do not reflect the cited source (or other RSs I've seen), involving some conceptual confusion. If you'd like to add details, please do so in the body of the article, or more detailed related articles, and make sure they follow the policies. If you like, we can continue this discussion on the article talk page. Eperoton (talk) 01:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tetrapod, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Seals and Pinguins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that nikah mut'ah exists and that mut'ah and wedlease both refer to temporary marriages, do you agree that the word "proposed" should be removed from the first sentence of the page wedlease? 79.67.80.56 (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egyptian Australians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coptic Christianity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conversion to Islam in prisons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Identity and Black Muslims. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21789512, which does not appear to be released under a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prostitution law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illegal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Multi-level marketing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commission. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Temple Emil.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Iceland#The_back_.26_forth_minor_edit_war_about_what_continent_Iceland_is_in.2C_and_what_a_continent_is is relevant to your interests. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 19:02, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.The thread is Gablescar. Shrike (talk) 17:58, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Note: See Talk:Donald Trump-Russia dossier for an explanation. --MelanieN (talk) 19:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE STOP re-adding this inaccurate material to the lede. I have invited you to the talk page to discuss this. I have warned you that the article is under special restrictions so that you can't just keep on re-adding your own version. I do not want to have to report you for violating the Discretionary Sanctions, but that will be the only recourse if you keep on ignoring messages and edit-warring misinformation back into the lede. --MelanieN (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Al-Andalus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Adultery. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. PepperBeast (talk) 04:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unclean animal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Masorah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision and for Disruptive editing and violation of the "consensus required" provision on the page Donald Trump-Russia dossier, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. GoldenRing (talk) 11:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chileans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magallanes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maghrebi Arabic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 10:19, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 10:29, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:MOSMAC. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 10:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Al-Andalus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Al-Andalus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed what you wrote on Chilean Spanish because I dont think it helps argue the case for a process that happened 2000 years ago. Yes, lenition of final /s/ is known to have occurred in French, Spanish, and other languages but .... it is far too recent to be in any way connected to what hapepened in early Italian. I posted on the talk page. Thank you, —Soap— 20:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Rhode Island Red (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lechon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dorsal fin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multi-level marketing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Profit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amazonian Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ladino.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! mgiganteus1 (talk) 17:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ordeal of the bitter water. Binksternet (talk) 06:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 15:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adultery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conception.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Septuagint, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit of 04:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC) of Voiceless dental and alveolar lateral fricatives, you introduced a reference to "Blau 2010" but there is no "Blau 2010" or any other year in the References. I was going to ask you to supply the Blau reference, but I found it in Biblical Hebrew. Please be careful when copying references between articles that they still work! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aramaic alphabet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akkadian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Map-Hispanic countries.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use. Replaced with File:Detailed SVG map of the Hispanophone world.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]