User talk:Aila.Rot

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xiaomichel. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked and suspected of multiple accounts? I don't get it. My account is new, I just made one edition for the moment . I copy-pasted additional information of the user xiaomichell that was removed even if it was sourced. Is it wrong? Aila.Rot (talk) 19:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid at this point you would need to post an unblock request as detailed above and convince an uninvolved administrator that you are not xiaomichel. Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What? I have to prove myself that I am not someone else? 😆 Aila.Rot (talk) 19:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aila.Rot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am wrongly suspected of multiple account use. I just made one edition. Aila.Rot (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. You need to address why you were restoring edits from a blocked user, as per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xiaomichel. Yamla (talk) 19:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aila.Rot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wanted to add an information about the Agnelots of Savoy in the article Agnolotti and I saw in the historial that this information and more had been included and removed by another user. So I copy-pasted the content removed and included it in the article again. This content is from Xiaomichell and I did not know that they are a blocked user. The information I re-added is sourced and just an extra information to the current content. I don't see why it is controversial. Aila.Rot (talk) 10:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looking into the edit history that closely would be unusual for a brand new user. This does not convince me. 331dot (talk) 20:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.