User talk:Aedis1

Welcome to Wikipedia, Aedis1! Thank you for your contributions. I am I dream of horses and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 19:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Rugby haven't assigned the Stage 3 players to the pro teams so factually (by wiki rules) we can't write that. btw - good work on filling the rest of the info out.

--- I saw them in the line-up but no official comms has come out saying they are in the squad or aligned. They're not even on the team page on the official site. Ali Price will get games this year so it's strange he's not listed. Maybe have section "Stage 3 Academy players that have played for Warriors"? and add them as and when they play a league game. Can't really do it for a friendly.

I'm working on these at the moment - are you interested in helping out? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Scottish_Rugby_Schools_Conference&redirect=no https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Chrispalmer10/sandbox2&redirect=no

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Ritchie (rugby union, born 1848), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kelso. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good to see another Scottish districts article up and running. Would you say the North & Midlands team is the same as the "North of Scotland" teams which played touring sides earlier in the 20th century (e.g. the 1931-32 South Africa side)? I'm looking to put some links to the article in and wondering if its reasonable to link from that team to the new article? --Bcp67 (talk) 16:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm pretty sure North of Scotland District team merged with the Midlands District to form North and Midlands. Not sure of the date though. Aedis1 (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting stuff on the N & M team on the 1973 tour talk page - thank you for making such a comprehensive and detailed reply to my thoughts - clearly a subject you've got an excellent knowledge of. My main interest here in rugby terms is the amateur era, which isn't particularly well-documented, and the old tours and representative teams are a long-standing interest. Keep up your exellent work!! --Bcp67 (talk) 07:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Welsh (rugby union) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Welsh (rugby union) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JTtheOG (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Rugby Union Barnstar
		For all your wonderful Victorian rugby player creations. My favourite type of rugby player. Don't get narked at my changes, I went through exactly the same tweaks by older Wikipedians when I started. Keep it up. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:44, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating William Andrew Walls, Aedis1!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please clean up the URLs in the references section. See WP:CITE for details.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, Aedis1, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, East of Scotland District (rugby union), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! --Cavarrone 17:13, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles that you have been involved in editing—Clarkston RFC and Glasgow Southern RFC —have been proposed for merging with Glasgow Hutchesons Aloysians RFC. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jellyman (talk) 13:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jim Inglis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selkirk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2004–05 Glasgow Warriors season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Barrow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Greenyards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://canmore.org.uk/site/304624/melrose-high-street-greenyards-melrose-rugby-football-ground. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TopCipher (talk) 11:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rory Couper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irvine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2003–04 Glasgow Warriors season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Andy Wilson and Nicky Robinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop copy and pasting content, a move has been requested that will retain the edit history. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The standard format in wikipedia for rugby union players that have been named elsewhere is to put a (rugby union) identifier after the name. (rugby player) is normally only used for players who play dual code. Turner should named as (rugby union) not (rugby player). The rugby player identifier should be the redirect NOT the other way round. In addition the arrow sign is used to specify a loan not (loan) in the infobox. Aedis1 (talk) 21:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but please wait for someone to move the page (I have requested that this be done). Copy and pasting content is not the way to achieve this. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:06, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You replied on my talk page, even though I said I had replied to you here. You said "I was moving the page. The redirect was to be (rugby player)." I have repeatedly tried to tell you that you are not doing this in an appropriate way. The page needs to be moved, not using copy-paste. You could start by looking at WP:MOVE if you aren't familiar with this process. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You will see that George Turner (rugby union) now has the right edit history going back to October 2015 when the article was created. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Phil Healey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG - a news search has drawn a blank.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schwede66 19:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Max McFarland, Aedis1!

Wikipedia editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article on Max McFarland. Thank you for your contribution

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 20:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scotland national under-20 rugby union team, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Malcolm and Jack Cosgrove (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Scotland national rugby union players, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Thomson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Logan Trotter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stirling County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Sugden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dartmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ollie Smith (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While the subject is signed to a professional rugby union team, they have not yet made any appearances on said team, making this WP:TOOSOON and not fulfilling WP:NRU. Sources provided are not independent, and thus this article does not meet WP:GNG by conventional means.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Charlie Capps (rugby union).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aedis1. If you're moving content from one page to another, would you please credit the original page in the edit comment on the target page, and also explain and link the target page in the edit comment on the former comment, as attribution is required. Thanks, ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 03:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glasgow Warriors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benetton Treviso (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I've removed the instances of File:Glasgow Warriors logo.svg that you added to the various season articles of this team. Unfortunately, per terms of WP:NFC#UUI #17, we don't permit the use of sports logos in this way in adding them to various seasons of the team when the sports logo is non-free. Also, when you add a non-free image to any article, it is required that a new rationale be added to the image's description page for each use. This is per policy at WP:NFCC #10c. More information on adding a rationale can be found at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. If you have questions about this, let me know. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Glasgow Warriors season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Huw Jones and Ian Davies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Francisco Tavares has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fitness coach who fails GNG, NFOOTY and NRU

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 12:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Logan Trotter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 14:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1,

Thank you for creating 2020–21 Glasgow Warriors season.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Multiple issues exist with this page. Please add multiple independent, reliable sources that prove the general notability of the page. These should be sources that are not affiliated in any partnership with the team.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 14:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ian Henderson (rugby union), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haddington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1,

Thank you for creating John Simson (rugby union).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Expansion needed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

WikiAviator (talk) 10:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1

Thank you for creating Albert Harvey.

User:John B123, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've reverted your edit to the article where you have formatted the refs using reFill. Unfortunately reFill changed the urls for the newspaper archive to the registration page and the ancestry url to the log-in page. You need to format these references manually. (I would do it for you but I haven't got a subscription to either site.)

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

John B123 (talk) 22:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1,

Thank you for creating James Aikman Smith.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A really informative article, but the references are bare urls to the British Newspaper Archive. Following these links takes you to a log in page so, unless you have a subscription, give no indication of the source. It would be far more informative if the publication, date and title were added to the refs.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 17:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A. G. G. Asher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David McCowan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The List of Scottish Rugby Union Presidents shows Hamish Kemp as President #98, but the article about him does not mention that office. Please investigate and make corrections as needed.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 22:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC) Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given.[reply]

Hey. When you submit articles with sources, please don't just include bare URLs. Give metadata (name of publication, author if applicable, date of publication if possible). Thanks. DS (talk) 03:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marshall Sykes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:04, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Euan McLaren".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Murphy Walker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:03, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ross Thompson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scotland Probables is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotland Probables until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Scottish Trial sides requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:United States Selects international rugby union players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stirling HSFP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sport in Stirling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1946 disestablishments in Scotland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby union clubs disestablished in 1946 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby clubs disestablished in 1946 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby union players in the Channel Islands by club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby union players in the Channel Islands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby union people in Channel Islands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Glasgow Warriors season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benetton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jim Calder (rugby union), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haddington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sport in Na h-Eileanan Siar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the references in Aberfeldy RFC (and other of your rugby club articles) are, I'm sorry to say, rubbish.) Taking ref 9 as an example, you provide a refernce of https://www.facebook.com/login/?next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FAberfeldyRFC%2Fposts%2F3927346117375377 with an anchor of "log into facebook". Can you really not see that that is the very poorest ref imaginable? Where else on WP do you see such bad refs? At best you should be pointing to https://www.facebook.com/AberfeldyRFC/posts/3927346117375377 and with a suitable anchor.

Refs 1, 2 & 3 - again, all useless. They take me to a login page. I'm unsure if the key in the URL points to a page, or not. The anchor for the ref tells me nothing at all about the source - presumably an identifiable newspaper with a name, a date, a story title, which could form part of the ref citation?

Please do better. Your rugby club articles are great. Your referencing style and content is absolutely useless. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to use bare urls. Although I then get asked to use tools like Refill to cite instead. So I use Refill and it messes with all my links. Damned if I do, damned if I don't. Aedis1 (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, not damned if you do &c. Use appropriate URLs. Use appropriate citation templates. Take Crieff and Strathearn RFC, for instance. Bare URLs, but appropriate URLs. Why are they not presented within {{cite web}} or perhaps better {{cite news}}? It's possible to do the right thing. You're merely choosing to do the wrong thing as if you had no other choice. You do have a choice. Put appropriate URLs within appropriate citation templates. --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aedis1, I have to agree with @Tagishsimon. I am working on a big cleanup of WP:Bare URLs, and I have found lots of articles created by you which are full of bare URLs. See e.g. 1906–07 Scottish Districts season and many other pages in Category:Scottish Districts seasons which have bare URL refs to the British Newspaper Archive.

References are most easily filled in by the editor who adds them,because they have source visible in front of them. please try to fill them in as you go, rather than leaving them for others to clean up after you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Robert Walker (Third Lanark footballer) article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 11:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The source is based on information from ancestry.co.uk https://www.ancestry.co.uk/family-tree/person/tree/625130/person/160197248840/facts

The freemason information is also found on ancestry.co.uk

https://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=60620&h=418813&tid=&pid=&queryId=3566bd36bd09aa1fb8916b1ab45244fb&usePUB=true&_phsrc=Jal10&_phstart=successSource

Aedis1 (talk) 11:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aedis1, two problems here;

1. ancestry.co.uk is not a reliable source, so it shouldn't be used.
2. the source should be cited in the article when you add the info.

--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, UWS RFC, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JBchrch talk 19:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Montrose and District RFC, is not suitable as written to remain published. Please see the tags which have been on the page for 5 months now. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, RDVC RFC, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Abertay University RFC, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Glasgow Caledonian University RFC, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom Jordan (rugby union), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UWS RFC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abertay University RFC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UWS RFC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ferguslie CC players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:RDVC RFC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Glasgow Caledonian University RFC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lindsay Renwick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Hastings.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cory Daniel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Malcolm Swan is an excellent page. Well done. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope you don't mind a bit of friendly advice. If you've created a page with a disambiguated title, like Hugh Orr (rugby union), it's good practide to add a link to the article to somewhere where readers might land if they do a search for the name and find a different article. This is usually either a disambiguation page, or a primary topic article with a hatnote. If you have a look at a couple of edits I've done today you can see how it works. for David Brown and Hugh Orr (although I had to amend the hatnote). I pick up a lot of these from the rugby union new articles list and try to fix them, but easier of the article creator does it at the time. All the best. Bcp67 (talk) 16:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2001–02 Amateur Scottish Inter-District Championship, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 16:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cory Daniel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:32, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Montrose and District RFC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Pat Burnet is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:15, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Montrose and District RFC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	William Stevenson (rugby union) is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Doug Keller is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:14, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shinty clubs established in 1855 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Years of the 19th century in shinty indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Shinty by year indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Charles Nimmo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:01, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2001–02 Amateur Scottish Inter-District Championship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shinty clubs established in YYYY category header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Shinty category header templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Simon Berghan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Shinty templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 Glasgow Warriors season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musgrave Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Scottish female painters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Aedis1! I saw that you created a few new categories for "female artists." However, the ones you created already exist over in Category:Women artists. So, just a heads-up that I have proposed delete for Category:British female artists in order to start getting that cleaned up. But thank you for your efforts to improve the coverage on women artists! --@Rynb99 Rynb99 (talk) 00:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw that. Since the relevant male category is British male artists, its counterpoint should be British female artists. Either that or change British male artists to British men artists. Aedis1 (talk) 00:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. Thank you for your work on Kate Campbell Muirhead. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs an image.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 09:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Female painters by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now a redirect.--Ipigott (talk) 08:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Female sculptors by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now a redirect.--Ipigott (talk) 08:43, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Aedis1, and thanks for all your biographies of Scottish artists. I see that recently you have created quite a few on women. Perhaps you would like to become a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. If so, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Female artists by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Female sculptors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Allan Walton

added a link pointing to Director

Douglas Bliss

added a link pointing to Director

Dugald Cameron

added a link pointing to Director

Francis Henry Newbery

added a link pointing to Director

Irene McAra-McWilliam

added a link pointing to Director

John Henderson (painter)

added a link pointing to Director

Seona Reid

added a link pointing to Director

William Oliphant Hutchison

added a link pointing to Director

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charles Nimmo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2001–02 Amateur Scottish Inter-District Championship, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. Thank you for your work on Ben Afshar. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day and Merry Christmas!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. Thank you for your work on Glasgow Warriors Women. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rugby clubs established in 1855 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1855 in rugby union indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aedis1. Thank you for your work on Duncan Munn. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aedis1. Thank you for your work on Fin Richardson. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the Rugby article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 04:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaun MacDonald (rugby union) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun MacDonald (rugby union) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rob McAlpine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob McAlpine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 18:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scottish women embroiderers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Aedis1, I moved the content to Draft:John Fleming Millmaker SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 13:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The pages I am creating are purely for my notes. I may or not publish them, but they are definitely not ready yet. Aedis1 (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I thought you confused your user page with the draft, you can recover the content. Sorry for this mistake. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2024–25 Celtic Challenge table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. SimplyLouis27 (talk) 20:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2023–24 Celtic Challenge table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. SimplyLouis27 (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aedis1. Thank you for your work on Ruaraidh Hart. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]