User talk:Oleksiy.golubov

Hello, Oleksiy.golubov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 11:22, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup, we cordially invite you continue your participation by joining the virtual worldwide online event hosted by Women in Red. March 2016 (Women's History Month)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. I'd like to know how you came up with Mr. Pritychenko's patronym. I occasionally copy-edit biographies about Russians and other East Slavic individuals, and I've rarely had luck tracking down the patronymics. My technique has been googling the subject's given and last names (in Cyrillic), which is rarely successful.

Also, congratulations on your new articles. Rebbing 19:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. I don't know any general method either. In this case I just wrote an email to Mr. Pritychenko and asked him. (Also about place of birth and citizenship, this was not available online.) Not a reliable source, but better than nothing:) Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you created a disambiguous page for Zabrama which included a red link. DAB links MUST link to pages that already exist in Wikipedia. Please see MOS:DABRL. Do not revert. Thank-you David.moreno72 (talk) 01:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@David.moreno72: Not true: a red link is permitted—although by no means recommended—when it's linked from at least one article and is plausibly notable. See MOS:DABRED. The link in question satisfies both criteria. Rebbing 02:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But there is no 'a village in Russia' article

A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included on a disambiguation page when an article (not just disambiguation pages) also includes that red link.

When the Zabrama article has been created, THEN link to it.

I Googled Zabrama and it doesn't seem very notable at all so it will likely never be created, per

Do not create red links to articles that are unlikely ever to be written, or are likely to be removed as insufficiently notable topics.

David.moreno72 (talk) 02:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Read your first quote. The non-existent article Zabrama, Bryansk Oblast is linked to from Boris Pritychenko—an article. That satisfies the first requirement. As for notability of foreign subjects, the unavailability of English-language sources on Google can be misleading. (Did you search for "Zabrama" or "Забрама"?) My Russian isn't good enough to evaluate the results, but I'm unable to say with any confidence that it's "likely to be removed as [an] insufficiently notable topic[]." Anyway, if our rule was that editors must create articles before linking them on disambiguation pages, the Manual of Style would simply say: "No red links." But it doesn't. Rebbing 03:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But the article Boris Pritychenko wasn't on the DAB page, instead it said a village in Russia, which is not an article. A DAB entry needs a link that will eventually have what is being disambiguated in the target. That was not the case in this instance.David.moreno72 (talk) 03:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You miss the point. Let me try again:

1. Zabrama, Bryansk Oblast is a red link;
2. Zabrama, Bryansk Oblast appeared as a red link on the disambiguation page;
3. Boris Pritychenko, an article, also has a red link to Zabrama, Bryansk Oblast;
4. Therefore, the red link Zabrama, Bryansk Oblast that appeared on the disambiguation page satisfies the instruction at MOS:DABRED that "[a] link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included on a disambiguation page when an article . . . also includes that red link."

Rebbing 03:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not the one missing the point. See MOS:DABMENTION It states If a topic does not have an article of its own, but is mentioned within another article, then a link to that article should be included. In this case, the link does not start the line, but it should still be the only blue wikilink The link to the article hasn't been included. There is no English wikilink. All it says is 'a village in Russia'

Note: I've opened a thread about this matter at WT:MOSDAB § When is it permissible to include a red link on a disambiguation page?. Rebbing 06:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See details at Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Wiknic/2016, the June date has been postponed.--Pharos (talk) 07:51, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oleksiy.golubov. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oleksiy.golubov. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Emergent Scientist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Chuhuiv Observational Station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses ^{(talk) (contribs)} _{Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page} 20:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chuhuiv Observational Station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses ^{(talk) (contribs)} _{Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page} 20:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chuhuiv Observational Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reflector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Alex,

In 2014 you had kindly helped me to start a new article Хадаравичюс, Аудрис Мечисловас [ru]. I solicit your courtesy to express your opinion whether the Lithuanian Silver Crane cinematography award warrants notability of the awarded person. Please visit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Emilis_V%C4%97lyvis#Silver_Crane_award_effect_on_notability to share your insight.

Yours, Tomas Ttk371 (talk) 20:50, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]