User talk:Nishkid64/Archive 14

Hi Nishkid,

Kindly restore the article of Dr. Swami Manohar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swami_Manohar). He certainly deserve one. We can discuss this on WP:AFD.

Few of the articles which I found on Google for "Swami Manohar" are

http://www.csic.iisc.ernet.in/Facprof/FacultyPerpro.asp?elid=smanohar

http://presidentofindia.nic.in/scripts/delatest1.jsp?id=2

http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/research/seminars/2004.08.13.html

http://www.picopeta.com/about/team.php

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&id=618321

So I earnestly request you to restore it back.

Thank you Shaji --Shaji Kalidasan 10:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You seem like a good admin. Young, eccentric, with unique qualities. I need your help, this user Martinp23 is giving me bother and accusing me of things. I'm just a new user with a 3 day old account, with 150 contributions and he's saying he's going to block me for being a sockpuppet, but I'm not, can you tell him to leave me alone. Because actually I don't know what he's on about because I don't recall vandalising anything Nitro calibur 22:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just give it up, man. I talked with Martin about this, and we suspected that you are Sunderland. You made your account right after you got blocked on Sheogarath, and you just coincidentally wandered upon my user page and decided to ask me for help. Nishkid64 22:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, if that was the case the Ip would be blocked wouldn't it. I'm certainly not this Sunderland guy. Nitro calibur 22:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your community center changed their IP. It's a rotating IP, and we knew this was bound to happen. Besides, you made like a dozen accounts after being blocked each time. Obviously, you got around the IP block somehow. Nishkid64 22:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit conflict]But as you said on wikiyouth, your IP has suddenly changed - as BT sometimes do (I'e had 8 IPs in the last month, and I'm on BT). Martinp23 22:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Nishkid, I'm not admitting to be any sockpuppet. This is my first and only account on wikipedia. I don't understand how or why this is happening because, but if you look at my contributions, you will see, that I' am no vandal or enemy of this amazing masterpiece of a site. I have helped it a lot. Stop this, I' am not this vandal. Nitro calibur 22:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what the hell you skilled admins are on, because I haven't done anything, plus what the hell are you saying about a community center, if I'm blocked, I will have to email this site explaining everything. Nitro calibur 22:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I demand answers to the following questions.

-What is going on???

-What have I done wrong???

-Who is Molag bal???

-Why am I the target???

-What do you plan to do???

Nitro calibur 22:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You fail to acknowledge WP policies. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 22:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, let's resolve this, I' am a 27 year old student from the university of Durham. I got Wikipedia 4 days ago, not knowing anything about it, and then suddenly all this comes up, sockpuppets, banned users, blocks, I need you to think straight in your head, and relise, I'am a friend and contributor to this website. I have made nearlly 200 already, sure, I've made mistakes, and warned a user by accident, but I've welcomed new users, caught vandals, created articles, and expanded other ones, and this refers me to a banned user? I have vandalised at all in my contributions, I've been nice, got help from other users, and helped them. If a banned user has possibly done this. Then why are they banned, and what's the big idea about all this. I ask you nicely, to leave me alone, because I'm not a sock, and I respect the admins of this site greatly, as they make thousands of edits, and keep this site knitted together, if it wasn't for you and such other admins, Wikipedia would fall apart by vandals in less than a day. But my main point is, I don't exactly know what's going on. Nitro calibur 15:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nishkid - you may find this diff interesting, if not amusing. Martinp23 22:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And that diff has nothing to do with me, look, let's close this now. I'm not this user and you're wasting your time including mine. Nitro calibur 21:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC

Hi, User:Nitro calibur wrongly placed a warning template User talk:BlueValour#No adverts after the edit here. I should be grateful if you would delete it from my history, please. BlueValour 04:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was an accident you know. I' am sorry for all this trouble. Nitro calibur 21:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nishkid!You probably don't remember me, but I was wondering what does your monobbok code do?No offence intended, but I hate trying to read the script and find it easier to just ask.Also, if I have your permission and I if I wish to use it, may I "borrow" the code?Thanks and since I can't remember your talk page rules, coul you respondd on my talk page?Thanks a bunch! Post scriptum: can youplease sign my Autograph book?Thanks for that too! —¡Randfan!^{Sign here?} 17:00, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My monobook lets me use Lupin's Anti-Vandal Tool and Voice of All's Admin scripts. It gives me a whole new toolbox to help me with editing and quick admin functions. I only think the Lupin's tool would only work for you, but go ahead and use it. Nishkid64 20:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martin may have it confirmed that I' am the one and only Molag bal. But he can't block me, why? Because you must assume good faith, and as I haven't made any personal attacks or vandalismanything. Infact I've went and turned myself round. This is my only account, with 200 edits, of helping society, look at my contributions, see what help I've been to Wikipedia. Nitro calibur 22:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have to follow AGF - it's not a policy!However most of us do, and have done up until now with you.We don't have to wait for you to do something wrong, as based on your past record, we can block as you're circumventing an earlier block (is it a ban? Nishkid?) using a sock account.I'll also look into filing an abuse report with BT. Martinp23 22:25, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've blocked him Nishkid (just beating me to it, after I blocked you accidentally!)Sorry! Martinp23 22:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha - I think I unblocked you pretty quickly, still :).I've blocked the underlying IP of Nitro for a month (hard block). Martinp23 22:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the offer, but I'm really not all that interested in moply duties.I can do without the grief . Anyway, I always can call on great admins like you when I need to rewrite the Main Page, etc. Rfrisbie^talk 22:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, dang! If you ever re-consider, let me know. I'd be glad to nominate you whenever. Thanks for the kind words too :-P. Best, Nishkid64 22:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sprot. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 23:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your refusal to listen to reason and once AGAIN un-protecting Automobile against the wishes of it's editors has made me very, very angry indeed.Today - just one day after unprotecting it - it was blanked by a vandal and remained blanked for 30 minutes.This is not acceptable for pivotal articles such as this one.

I am planning to take action by encouraging editors of articles such as Automobile to refuse to fix vandalism unless the necessary 'sprotection' is provided.

I consider it your sole responsibility to patrol that article and keep it looking good - it'll be a 24 hour task though so you'd better find some other "non-sprotect" enthusiasts to help you.I doubt many of it's regular editors will be working on it anymore. SteveBaker 01:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Watch your tone there. Get your facts straight before venting your anger on some innocent bystander. See [1]. Don't try to use tactics such as "we'll stop vandal-fighting". That's complete b.s. and you know it.

Btw, do you know how fast it takes for me to revert? Less than a second. I just need to press one button and it's reverted back. That easy. Nishkid64 02:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would be honored if you could sign my new signature book. I am trying to collect 2007 before January! sign here — s d 3 1 4 1 5 14:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had a message when looking up something that I'd vandalised a Kim D'eon article.I don't even know who that is,and I've never edited a wikipedia article in my life.So,I don't know why my ip address showed,but it sure as heck wasn't me.And I'm leaving this message,because the contact wikipedia page said to email you,but I see nothing on your edit page where I can.I haven't even been here for a couple months,at least,I don't think.So please don't be accusing me of vandalism.This does not help people enjoy this site any,I'll tell you that!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.167.139.89 (talk) 18:39, 22 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Well, it seems like someone else using your computer vandalized the page, or you have a shared IP in which someone from another computer vandalized the page. Nonetheless, just ignore it, and everything will be fine. Nishkid64 22:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which did not succeed and was closed early at 2/10/9. I am not discouraged, however, and will use the experience to improve my skills until a later date when I may succeed. Yuser31415 20:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that wins for the lamest edit war that I have seen in a long time. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 02:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added it to Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars. :) :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 02:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The user has received the full verror cycle of warnings and has already been reported.Your "final" warning is a bit delayed. :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You blocked this guy at the beginning of the month. He is now up to his old tricks at Andrea Meldolla. Anything you can do? Cheers Johnbod 21:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there's nothing I can really do here. The user hasn't violated 3RR, but he has been confrontational, but that still wouldn't justify a block. Try reasoning with him; I know he's rude, but just find some common ground to discuss on. Nishkid64 23:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for protecting it. It was getting pretty heated there. Both sides are accusing the other of sockpuppetry, so I dunno how it'll all turn out. :S I thought that was a pretty easy call for requesting page protection. Anyway, happy hols to you, too, and as we fans of Homestar Runner say, Happy Decemberween! Heimstern Läufer 21:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason you've left Lar's nom from the 20th out of the next update? Looks Ok to me (or are you saving it because it has a pic?) Yomangani^talk 00:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was watching Lar's edits because I was going to ask him how he did the credits, and I happened to see the note he left on your talk page. I went to Next Update, and I saw Bakasuprman already added a DYK with a picture, so Lar's was left out. Also, see my edit summary at T:DYKT: "2 moved to Next Update. Next time, Lar. :-p". I saw you removed it afterwards, thinking that someone hadn't updated Next Update, and I was going to message you, but I thought you would understand what happened. Ehh...whatever, we'll get Lar in later today. Nishkid64 00:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I missed your edit summary. I just didn't want it getting left behind next time because it is a solid DYK, and as it is now the lone nom left on the 20th people might be wondering why it was left and leave it again. Still, we have a fairly sensible bunch working on DYK, so I shouldn't worry. Cheers, Yomangani^talk 00:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_December_16 close discussion of strict--Foundby 01:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can the consesus be delete? The keep have better responses. --Foundby 01:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See this "*Keep. Please read this informal deletion discussion, specifically this section. By the way, some of you are shooting yourselves in the foot by saying it's unwanted; if a strict set of rules for answering is unwanted, many of you don't have much ground to stand on for the RD debates --froth^{T "}--Foundby 01:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I said Speedy Keep. lol--Foundby 01:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you archive this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Science_collaboration_of_the_week#Oxygen

& then semi protect the page?--Foundby 01:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nish, I saw your message. I'm ok with waiting for three days before being allowed to edit. Regards, and wishes to you and your family for a Merry Christmas and a very pleasant new year... Mrinal Mrinal Pandey 05:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On December 24, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chuck Estrada, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 06:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Patelco has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi Nish, I had put up a request to unprotect the IIPM article yesterday. I could not find the request out there so am messaging you out here. It'll be nice if you can kindly tell me whether you can unprotect it. Or at least put my user id along with the ids of others who're allowed to edit. You could bounce of my name to Deepak Shenoy, Makrand who're editing the page since long and who's version is what you have accepted before edit protecting the page. The problem I'm facing is that I've been editing this page since more than one year, but unfortunately was not using a loginid. It's only three days back that I've created a login id. With respect to the overall request for unprotection; the fact is that the current editors have kept reverting my move that if there's a separate project created called "IIPM Controversy" then details of that should not be repeated in the project page called "IIPM". Only summaries of the IIPM Controversy page should be given in the IIPM page. It'll be nice if you can visit the IIPM page and also the IIPM Controversy page and realise the situation. I had personally requested for mediation; and for information, it was I who had requested Ganesh to protect the page from vandalism (you could directly check from him too). My apologies for writing so much, but my requests are just two (1) Kindly put my login id as one that is allowed to edit (you could check from Deepak and Makrand if you want) (2) Kindly revert the unprotect after you have yourself checked the details that so many details on the page IIPM Controversy are being repeated on the page called IIPM. I'll await your reply, regards. Mrinal Pandey 07:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's no way I could have a "whitelist" for people who could edit the page. You told your account was just created and according to the semi-protection policy, your account will be allowed to edit the page in about 3 days time. I'm not involved in this matter, but I'll try talking to Ganesh to see if protection should be removed. If he doesn't agree, you can just wait 3 days until you will be allowed to edit the page. Nishkid64 18:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nishkid, Thanks for the protect. As I am involved in the reverts, it would be wrong for me to protect the article or block any users. That was the reason for my protect request. Mrinal had requested me to block other IPs, but never asked for protection. So whatever he said was not true. He was the first one to blank the contraversies section. And the rest of the gang continued it. I can see a lot of new accounts on the IIPM talk page. I am going to create a sock check request soon. Deepak and myself are trying to make them understand the non-negotiable NPOV policy. These people are bent on removing criticism and contraversy sections. I would say the protection should stay for some more time to stop these people vandalising the article. Thanks for your help. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ganesh for the message to Nishkid. You perhaps conveniently forget that I was the one reverting back to "your" versions (that is Deepak Shenoy's versions) when the vandals starting attacking. I have also read the issue of your personal award to Deepak Shenoy and your personal affiliations with supporting the IIPM Controversy section. I quote from the person whom you gave the barnstar award for adhering to NPOV and for keeping the IIPM controversy alive. When I told Deepak Shenoy that people should not be reverting illogically, guess what he told me... The following is quoted from the trancripts of Deepak Shenoy's discussions with me when he attempted to steamroll me into consenting throwing off your admin powers to me:

• """Mrinal, Reverting is not a right only to existing editors of an article, it can be exercised by anyone. Let's all work on the assumption that we are mature people, and that anyone who wants to edit or change can do so. Do not put arbitrary restrictions - I don't even know if you are Mrinal or you are someone pretending to be Mrinal because you do not login here. Ganesh is a Wikipedia admin, by the way. Deepakshenoy 13:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)"""

Ganesh, if you are an administrator, who is also editing pages at IIPM, I do not believe that you should allow users like Deepak Shenoy to show off his personal closeness to you and to literally frighten other editors into acceptance. Kindly give the correct view to Nishkid. I'll be highly grateful if you also advise me on whether I'm wrong in assuming what I have assumed. Regards, Mrinal Mrinal Pandey 12:09, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

God (or your deity/deities) bless you and your family! —¡Randfan!^{Sign here?} 02:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-I was planning to hand these out on the 22nd of Dec. but things got in the way.... Happy holidays!—¡Randfan!^{Sign here?} 19:12, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas Nishkid64! You're consider one of my Wikifriends because you are a great admin and you made a lot of edits. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!--PrestonH | talk | contribs | editor review | 22:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Do you believe in Santa Claus??

		The Society Barnstar
		This Barnstar goes to Nishkid64 for honchoing through the Business and economics Portal to Featured portals status!!! Rfrisbietalk 23:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quit resting on your laurels! What are you interested in doing with Portal:Philosophy these days? ;-) Rfrisbie^talk 23:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for commenting on my recent RfA. The final tally was 63/3/2, and I have now been entrusted with the mop. I hope I will not cause you any worries, and certainly welcome any and all feedback.All the best, and thanks again! — Agathoclea 14:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I unprotected Mount Vesuvius, which you sprotected, since it's been over two weeks.Just a friendly notice :) Teke ^(talk) 03:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for selecting my Madeline La Framboise article for DYK.
I hope you have a Happy New Year!!
Epousesquecido 05:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]