User talk:Nathan Babik

May 2021

Hello, I'm Finneus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to North have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Finn! (talk) 20:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jackson, Queensland. Ifnord (talk) 21:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 21:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to add constructive info to 2048

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathan Babik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to add more constructive info about 2048 Nathan Babik (talk) 22:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You also added unconstructive info elsewhere. You'll need to explain why we should trust that you won't do that again, and describe the productive contributions you will make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|Theres no way that you can 100% trust anyone and I wont do that ever do it again and I really need this for school. If you see me doing it again then you can delete my account. Nathan Babik (talk) 18:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathan Babik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wont ever do it again and it was a dare from my friends. I swear ill never do it again. Nathan Babik (talk) 19:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are responsible for your own actions. You forgot to describe a productive contribution. You are free to create a new unblock request and may wish to give a specific example of a constructive edit you'd make. If you are able to demonstrate an exact edit you'd make, this will go a long way to convincing the reviewing administrator. Yamla (talk) 19:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathan Babik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My last productive contribution was to this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2048 I dont remember exactly what my edit was but it was deleted. I also made unconstructive contribution to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Jackson, Queensland and North and Im very sorry and I shouldn't have in the first place. Just please give me one last chance.]

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No no. None of your edits were constructive, we know that already. Please give an example of a future edit you'd make, if you were unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 20:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathan Babik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The 2048 edit ws supposed to be very constructive and I was trying to expand on what was written. I would add info about small games and make like a rule section for small board games.

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathan Babik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can you please unban me my whole school is ip banned now

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You now have three (!!!) open unblock requests. This is abusive. One at a time, please; remove all but one open unblock request, leaving the declined unblock requests in place. You also have yet to demonstrate an exact productive edit you'd make, and this is substantially counting against you. And, I'm sorry to say, the block on your whole school is your own fault. If other editors (constructive editors) are affected, they are free to request the block on them is lifted. --Yamla (talk) 21:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are yu serious this is what your life has come to just let me have my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nathan Babik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

idk how to even cancel

Decline reason:

Given your inability to follow simple instructions and your insults, your talk page access has been disabled. And, yes, this is what our lives have come to: blocking vandals and dealing with their petty insults. It's tedious and boring, but someone has to do it. You can still use WP:UTRS to make further requests, but you'll need to make a better attempt to follow instructions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You do know that youve banned so many people that have worked rly hard on their wikipeadia then u just ban them for saying one thing

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.