User talk:Naniwoofg

Hello, Naniwoofg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
• Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• How to add those all-important references
• Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Adakiko (talk) 06:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Presidency of Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 06:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Adakiko (talk) 06:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 Asian Swimming Championships, you may be blocked from editing. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 08:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Iglesia ni Cristo did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Also please do not ignore the rationale for keeping the INC logo. While the flag also represents the INC, the logo remains the primary identifier for the organization/church. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 17:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agusan del Sur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wawa River. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you must discuss the changes to some of the infobox images first before doing the changes themselves, since some of the changes you made were not conducive to the relevant articles:

• Images of copyrighted sculptural monuments: I've reverted your change on the infobox image of the shrine, since the replacement image you chose contains some distracting photobombers like the NHCP staff and the unveiling of a new marker. The previous image, in low quality to comply Wikipedia:Non-free content#Image resolution, serves better purpose. Low resolution is a must because Wikimedia Commons cannot host good images of the monument as the Philippines currently does not provide Freedom of Panorama in its copyright law. Another case of reversion of your edits include the Statue of the Sentinel of Freedom and the MacArthur Landing Memorial National Park.
• Sales Interchange: I had reverted your prior edit to that article, since the image you chose do not meaningfully show the whole interchange. Aerial image shows the interchange in a better context than a high-quality image from a ground level that only shows a part of the interchange. Your another image change attempt to the same article was reverted by another user.

I also reverted your edit on Elpidio Quirino Avenue as your choice of image actually shows the eponymous road in Manila, not the road in Parañaque. _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted yet another image change, NLEX-Mindanao Avenue Link is technically not part of Mindanao Avenue. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another one which I just discovered: your edit to Dr. Santos Avenue, which was manually reverted. You used an image of Parañaque–Sucat Road or Meralco Road (N144). I suggest you first undertake research on Google Street View before making edits, as you are using wrong images on several PH road articles, which is somehow disturbing. One more wrong image, and I may report this to the Philippine WikiProject (WP:TAMBAYAN). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HueMan1 (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot fathom why do you keep ignoring any changes. "Pic is not of high quality" as edit summary in reverts is not helpful as you do not even address the rationale in insisting on your changes such as the case of Lipa, Batangas. Please be more specific on edit summaries especially on edits/reverts that have been challenged by me and other usersHariboneagle927 (talk) 06:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Taft Avenue has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits.

Please Naniwoofg engage with us users by being specific on your edit changes. Insisting "Pic is not of higher quality" without addressing the reverts with carefully crated dissenting rationale is being distruptive like what you did with Taft Avenue.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC) Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot fathom why you refuse to engage and insist on your changes with the same vague edit summaries. Please at least give some feedback on why you make changes. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]