User talk:Mr. Smart LION/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Mr. Smart LION. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your addition to CID Vs Adaalat – Karmyudh has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 19:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Dude, Smart Lion, with regard to the warning left by Diannaa above, what is so difficult about the concept of "do not copy content from sources, then add them at Wikipedia"? You're not making the encyclopedia stronger, you're needlessly creating a copyright liability mess. Plot summaries and all other prose must be written from scratch, not copied or even closely paraphrased from other sources. Copying is theft. Cut it out already. Now I have to go through your other recent edits and remove copyrighted content, like here at Khaufnak Haveli, where you copied content presumably from the video description here.

Not to mention your assertion that an episode got "mixed to positive reviews from the viewers" is not adequately sourced. Whose voice are you quoting? Surely you don't think it's okay to decide in your own head that the response was X, then support that viewpoint with cherrypicked reviews, do you? In case you do, please stop that. Also, the phrase "mixed to ____" is widely shunned at Wikipedia, as it is derived from repeated instances of faulty synthesis between Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes ratings, typically in film articles. Some editors erroneously believe that if Metacritic says "mixed", and if Rotten Tomatoes indicates a positive score, that the summary should be "mixed to positive". That's nonsensical, but you didn't even make that mistake--you just pulled it out of thin air. Please don't do that. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: your creation of various articles for CID episodes like Khaufnak Haveli and Dongara Ki Wapasi, I strongly encourage you to open a discussion at WikiProject Television to get input from the community on whether or not the articles you've created should be standalone articles. The reason why I suggest you open this discussion is so you can have people other than me tell you that like anything else at Wikipedia, only if a television episode is independently notable should it have a unique article on it. That would typically include groundbreaking episodes like "Edith's 50th Birthday", which was one of the first American television episodes to depict an attempted rape, or the Seinfeld episode "The Contest", which received significant critical acclaim and which has information about production, etc. These subjects naturally have received sufficient attention from reliable published sources, and would meet our general notability guideline. Articles that have no real-world context and that are basically just glorified plot summaries are targets for deletion. Again, given all the notes I'm giving you today, I strongly recommend you open the discussion at WT:TV. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@Diannaa and Cyphoidbomb: OK, I will take care of the copyright material before adding it to the articles. And for making discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television before making articles on any special episodes of any Hindi TV series, I will do that. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 04:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

I want to clarify because your response sounds like you do not understand: please do not add copyrighted content to articles. Changing around a few words doesn't solve the problem. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

OK, I will not add any copyrighted material to articles. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 08:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

FYI A Question of Propriety oil on canvas, 1875, by Edwin Long is hanging in the National Gallery of Victoria, Australia. You deleted my entry and you are absorbing time I don't have - please change your ways.

Adelaide too (talk) 06:56, 17 July 2016 (UTC) Adelaide Too

Thanks for uploading File:Gangaatvshow.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:C.I.D. (Indian TV series).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice (Indian TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kapil Sharma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Aaj Ki Raat Hai Zindagi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Mr. Smart LION. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Shriya Pilgaonkar at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Pax Verbum 23:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Voice (Indian TV series) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Mr. Smart LION. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for The Kapil Sharma Show at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 01:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

On 19 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shriya Pilgaonkar, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that actress Shriya Pilgaonkar trained to become a professional swimmer as a child, and won several medals at school? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shriya Pilgaonkar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

For about a week, a single-purpose IP (122.163.51.108) has been reverting and otherwise editing—not improving—the page without edit summaries; I've notified them, but can't roll back to the better version because a constructive edit by another user was made in between. Since you were interested in GAN, you may want to keep an eye on it. Good luck and all the best, Miniapolis 17:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

I just semi-protected for two weeks; hope it helps. Miniapolis 17:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

@Miniapolis: Thanks for the good wish and as you are saying I may have to keep an eye on its revision history, I will do that as I want it to be a GA. And as for the page protection, thanks. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 17:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

		A plate of Samosa for you
		Here is a plate of Samosa for you. Samosa is fried or baked pastry with a savory filling, such as spiced potatoes, onions, peas, lentils. This is a popular refreshment food in countries of the Indian Subcontinent, specially in India, Bangaldesh, Pakistan. Thank you for elevating Neerja to GA. One of my favorite films as a Sonam Kapoor fan! Thank you. - ✈Sunnya343✈ (talk) 06:01, 25 August 2016 (UTC) For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

@Sunnya343: Thanks very much! Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 15:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Aaj Ki Raat Hai Zindagi has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#1). I suggest that you archive the rest of the article’s URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop “dead links” over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the “Save Page Now” box on the archive.org site and click save. This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=28 August 2016}}. Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

If I could also make a suggestion - the article would be clearer and more interesting if you included some examples of the people who appeared on the show and what they accomplished. There are several mentioned here:http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/RBbVSvDYsRphsxmKJBKhoL/Review--Aaj-Ki-Raat-Hai-Zindagi-has-its-heart-in-the-righ.html

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Ek Boond Ishq.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Mr.Smart LION! You are doing great on Wikipedia. What is the best way to learn wikipedia? I'm new and want to learn more, Thanks. Albertan 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertan2014 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

@Albertan2014: Hello, you can learn how to edit on Wikipedia by reading this help page: Help:Editing. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 05:41, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

See Special:Permalink/738377427. It appears that you are able to move the page yourself, so it's unclear why there needs to be a technical request for it. Sam Sailor, Lugnuts, and EdJohnston had some other comments about the move that you can follow up if need be. Thanks — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 16:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

@Andy M. Wang: I don't want to move the page myself because if I will redirect Thug (film) to desired title, than Thug (film) will show redirect in my contributions, which I don't want it to happen. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 17:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

See Special:Diff/738389919. I interpreted Thug (film) will show redirect in my contributions, which I don't want it to happen as a request to suppress the redirect. If this was done in error, create the redirect if need be. I've moved it to Thugs of Hindostan. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 17:41, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Mr. Smart LION. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, post here, or just let me know. Thank you, and happy editing! Widr (talk) 18:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Munna Michael is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munna Michael until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 17:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Mr. LION, Thanks for replying my previous post. I've a question about the notability criteria. I'm not too sure about the consistent use of notability criteria and that's why I'm afraid to create a new page. Can you please help me answer the below question? There is a producer named "Manish Mundra, he has produced many successful films and the below IMDB link is the proof. Does he meet the notability criteria to create a page on Wiki? Is IMDB website is considered reliable and authentic? Thanks for your help.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1549267/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertan2014 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

@Albertan2014: Hello, the IMDb link that you have given is not of Manish Mundra. For creating articles about filmmakers, you should first read the guidelines given at WP:FILMMAKER. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 05:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Sorry Mr. Lion. Here is the link for Manish Mundra. I did look at the guideline and I do believe that we can create a Wiki page for him as he had won many awards for his films. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm5712184/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertan2014 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

@Albertan2014: Looking the IMDb link of Manish Mundra, it seems that he is notable, so article on him can be created. But you should also make the article verifiable by adding reliable sources to it so that the article passes WP:N. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 05:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Crime Patrol Satark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Notifying all named accounts who have edited this article this year. There is a discussion of whether this article should contain foreign language palindromes. If you would like to comment the thread is Talk:Palindrome#Non-English_palindromes_2 Meters (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

can you please help me with editing the Karan Singh Grover page?~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.72.213 (talk) 12:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

hello need help with the Karan Singh Grover page58.106.72.213 (talk) 12:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

@58.106.72.213: If you need help to edit any article on Wikipedia, read the guidelines given on Editing. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 17:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Crime Patrol Satark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Mr. Smart LION, your creation of Naagin (season 2) in June 2016 was grossly premature and I'm a little confused by your thought process. Television series are not films. We don't create articles for second seasons as though they were film sequels. Only when there is sufficient content to justify a new television article be created should we do so. Nothing that was found in this version you created or this version four months later was so bulky that it could not have been easily incorporated into the main Naagin article.

Typically, television articles work like this:

• We have a main article about a television series. Say, Naagin (TV series). This article presents an overview of the series, what it's about, who's in it, general ratings info, reception, etc. See SpongeBob SquarePants.
  • When a show is new, a list of episodes is built at the main page. Once that gets too large (i.e. if the series has begun a second season) then we might create a List of Episodes article. See List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes.
    • Once that article gets too large, and if we have ample real-world content to warrant it, we might branch off into unique season-specific articles. See SpongeBob SquarePants (season 1). We typically transclude portions of the episode tables (minus episode summaries) to the List of Episodes article, to present an overview of the series' episodes.

What you did is not consistent with this normal structure. We had a main article at Naagin (TV series), then a Naagin (season 2) article, but we are missing everything in between. There simply isn't enough information to warrant the in-between articles anyway. By normal standards this should have gone:

[[Naagin (TV series)]]

Is there sufficient information (i.e. have we started a second season of episode tables) to warrant a List of Episodes article?

If no, do nothing.

If yes, create [[List of Naagin episodes]]

[[List of Naagin episodes]]

Is there sufficient information (i.e. 2 seasons of episode tables, comprehensive episode summaries, real-world information about casting, production, reception, etc.) to warrant individual episode articles?

If no, do nothing.

If yes, create [[Naagin (TV series) (season 1)]] and [[Naagin (TV series) (season 2)]]

I hope you please keep this in mind going forward, and if you have questions, asking experienced users is the best approach, rather than boldly creating new, but problematic, articles. The Naagin (season 2) article has been a nightmare because of sockpuppets and ignorant users who kept trying to force a prematurely created article into something that would never have met community muster. If you plan to edit television articles, please familiarize yourself with our Manual of Style for Television, because even Indian television articles have to adhere to it. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Read and understood. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 06:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

I appreciate the acknowledgement, thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi!

Sorry I didn't add the reference on the edits I made. Actually I added "Navjot Singh Sidhu" as a judge and Comedy Nights with Kapil as related show, and these were also mentioned below on the article in Format section. Then I changed "SDTV" into "PAL", which I saw here, as it says, "Do not use SDTV as it is ambiguous." After that I added "International broadcast" section, in which I added its broadcast in Pakistan by ARY Zindagi,^[1] and now the reference will be provided. But there is a problem of timings, I added 12:00am PST, but schedule has other timings. Actually in Pakistan, the show is premiered on Sunday and Monday at 12:00am PST, but the timings on schedule are of regular airing.

I think that the content should be re-added. Also I think that the name of show should be mentioned here. But if you would permit me, then I shall add.

Thanks! M.Billoo2000 (talk) 09:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

@M.Billoo2000: If you want to re-add the content, you can, but remember that you also have to include a citation to proof the added content as I said in your talk page. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 17:16, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

The age is wrong the thing you wrote about her engagement is wrong she never been engaged to sajid and she has done may more project please do change it thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truelife 123 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

@Truelife 123: These information haven't been put by me. I only updated her image. Interact with those users who have added these informations. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 05:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Baaghi 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nijwmsa Boro 07:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

The link to Ella O'Neill, one of the authors, refers to another (Mary) Ella O'Neill, not the Flash Gordon author. Just check it out on imdb. ^[2]

Albert van Veen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.152.245 (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)