User talk:Morekiranwiki

Hello, Morekiranwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Morekiranwiki/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Morekiranwiki/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Morekiranwiki/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Morekiranwiki. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to User:Morekiranwiki/sandbox, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Morekiranwiki. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Morekiranwiki|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gamezop. Thanks! ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback, ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ. I understand your concerns regarding WP:NCORP

. Here are three sources that I believe strongly support the notability of the article:

1. Economic Times - The Bro Code: Brothers Gamezop Co-founders enjoy the best of both worlds: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/the-bro-code-brothers-gamezop-co-founders-enjoy-the-best-of-both-worlds/articleshow/99162354.cms This source covers the background and success story of Gamezop, highlighting their growth and impact in the gaming industry, which adds depth to their notability.
2. Business Standard - Gamezop Expands Publisher Offerings with Newszop, Astrozop, and Criczop: https://www.business-standard.com/companies/start-ups/gamezop-expands-publisher-offerings-with-newszop-astrozop-and-criczop-123121900747_1.html. This article provides insight into Gamezop's expansion efforts, illustrating their broader industry impact and relevance.
3. CNBCTV18 - Gamezop Raises Rs 32 Crore in Series A Led by BITKRAFT Ventures: https://www.cnbctv18.com/startup/gamezop-raises-rs-32-crore-in-series-a-led-by-bitkraft-ventures-6764491.htm. This source details Gamezop's significant funding event, underscoring its financial growth and backing by a well-known venture capital firm, which supports its notability.

Additionally, you might find this resource useful in further assessing the notability of the subject:

• Livemint - Gamezop Drives More Than 650 Million Minutes of Engagement on MX Player with Games: https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/gamezop-drives-more-than-650-mn-minutes-of-engagement-on-mx-player-with-games-11637047769395.html. This article emphasizes Gamezop's user engagement and strategic partnerships, providing further evidence of their industry presence.

Morekiranwiki (talk) 07:52, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Raydann was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gamezop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 05:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekiranwiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 05:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]