User talk:MohdBaluban

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Hawker centre, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hawker centre, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CodingCyclone! 🌀 📘 00:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have also removed a personal attack on this talk page. Please refrain from personal attacks, such as calling people "stupid." CodingCyclone! 🌀 📘 01:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Malaysian cuisine, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Malaysian cuisine was changed by MohdBaluban (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939176 on 2021-04-14T01:00:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Malaysian cuisine. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hawker centre. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. If you want to change part of the article, in this case the country of origin, you have to provide actual credible evidence for that claim. And no, your own assertions do not count towards that. There is a talk page for these kinds of things. Here's the link: Talk:Hawker centre. Use it the next time you are unblocked. Dictonary1 (talk) 01:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this is a typical culture war between Malaysia and Singapore as the 2 countries shared a lot of heritage and culture due to the long complicated intertwined history and politics. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that MohdBaluban had used a vulgarity (in Malay) in edit summary here. pukimak is almost a Malay equivalent of fuck you. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]