User talk:MaybeMaybeMaybe/2012

This is an archive of past discussions about User:MaybeMaybeMaybe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi MaybeMaybeMaybe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for joining wikipedia and I hope you enjoy your time here.

I've nominiated for deletion here. This is on the grounds of the editing guideline Wikipedia:Overcategorization and Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality. As your new here you might not be up to speed with the many guidelines we have here and its worth familiarizing yourself with these. You are welcome to the discussion. It might be an idea to slow up on your categorisation work until the discussion has run its course, it would be a shame for your work to be undone.--Salix (talk): 19:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Hoaxes like the addition of "He died June 2012 after duelling with a polar bear" to a biography of a living person are not funny at all. Even if you remove them yourself later. Don't do something like that again, please. Amalthea 18:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

I restored to an earlier version to remove other hoax material in the categories section etc and that was the last thing i noticed needing removed. Before I worked on the article it had far more hoax and joke material in it. Please check diffs before accusing.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Riley&diff=513215568&oldid=508627795

Notice the difference. The fake/unsourced nick name and hoax/fake categories which you left in the article are now gone. MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

I see! My sincere apologies, absolutely my mistake! Amalthea 18:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		... for cleaning up month-old vandalism from an article (and then being accused of problematic edits for it). Apologies again! Amalthea 18:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks very much :) Just glad we got it all cleared up quickly.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 18:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

I don't think that the creation of a separate category, at this point in time was a good move. There are very few individual drawings that merit a separate article., and carving them off from the category "Works by Leonardo da Vinci" is not a good way to go.

I want to comment that as a new editor, you need to confer with the regular writers of the articles before making a major change to their categorisation. A minor change would entail adding a work to an extra category such as Renaissance drawings of women (I don't know if such a category exists). But the major category in this case is obviously Works by Leonardo da Vinci, and you have set to and removed several works without, as far as I know, any discussion.

Amandajm (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Scrub this.

I have observed that Drawings is coming up as a subcategory on the Works page. That's an OK solution! My apologies!

Amandajm (talk) 12:08, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Glad everything is OK. I thought that when some were divided by medium there may as well be one for drawings arranged in the same way.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 12:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Sorry to revert your addition to Annie Lennox without any discussion. But facing similar problems of validity here, I was wondering if could you clarify whether or not you think that a WP:RS, in which a person is unambigously described as "androgynous", must be provided before that category can be added to their article. Thanks? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

I would say that I would judge it like other categories and say the main thing is that the category is backed up by text in the main body of the article. Would these be OK as refs to then add the category to Lennox?[1][2] MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

I'd be hard pressed to think of better ones. But my only gripe is that there should be no room for personal judgement - the description, together with sources like those two, should already be in the article. Many thanks. Annie sometimes looks more of a man that I'll ever be :( Martinevans123 (talk) 16:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, MaybeMaybeMaybe! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:44, 6 October 2012 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Why add these? What do they add? And why add an incomplete one to the DGS page? Before adding them you should seek a consensus at the project, and work them up in a sandbox until they are reasonably complete. --John (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

As you have suggested Ihave moved the DGS table out and I am filling it out in a sandbox for now.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 21:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Lesbian Asian Americans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nymf _hideliho! 06:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Transgender and transsexual Asian Americans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nymf _hideliho! 06:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Androgynous individuals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nymf _hideliho! 06:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

I have reverted 4 edits of yours adding a redlinked category while removing a bluelinked one which gives the impression of vandalism. You obviously are doing this as part of a largeer content effort. Please take some time to evaluate any feedback given in this area of content. Agathoclea (talk) 18:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Can you correct the spelling please per WP:ENGVAR? --John (talk) 17:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Fixing it now.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 17:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Can you please add edit summaries to explain what you're doing with all those articles? It's not clear. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 20:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Ah, never mind. I'm slowly figuring it out by myself. Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 20:36, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate what you are doing and without qualification I will say that you are making Wikipedia better. I encourage you to make a userpage, though, and identify yourself and in your interests in some way. It is a comfort to other users. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

I think you would want to look at WP:OVERCAT and especially WP:DEFINING and WP:OC#EPONYMOUS.--Krystaleen 03:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes please look at these pages, as you are creating far too many categories that are going to end up being deleted. –anemoneprojectors– 15:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Durkin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heartbeat (TV series) and Knowing Me, Knowing You with Alan Partridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Gay dancers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 10:30, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

The same goes for Category:Gay choreographers and Category:Queer dancers. Bencherlite^Talk 13:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:LGBT atheists and Category:Gay atheists, which you created, have been nominated for possible deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the categories' entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 12:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

The same for Category:LGBT agnostics and Category:Gay agnostics. Bencherlite^Talk 12:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:American pescetarians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 21:43, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

So your response to a nomination for deletion of a potentially problematic category is (a) ignore the discussion and (b) create similar potentially problematic categories? That really isn't how to do things, you know. Bencherlite^Talk 08:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Is this really worth it? I don't think so. I think you've gone rather over the top in these categories, especially as the English ones are not normally called "high crosses" (for purely historical reasons). Johnbod (talk) 22:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

MaybeMaybeMaybe, I think most of the categories you are creating are unnecessary (especially eponymous ones), and would ask you to not make any more because the vast majority are likely to be deleted. –anemoneprojectors– 11:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Seriously stop! Category:Fictional Black English people isn't necessary as "Black British" is an identity whereas "Black English" is not. –anemoneprojectors– 09:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your helpful edits to the article page, Woodhull Sexual Freedom Alliance, much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:American gay-related television programs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Jewish American actors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf _hideliho! 09:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Richard Taylor (Hollyoaks) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Justin and Mel

Penelope Wilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daniel Massey

Scarecrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Human Nature

The Child (Star Trek: The Next Generation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to La Forge

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, MaybeMaybeMaybe! I see you have categorised Brisbane City Hall as possibly haunted. I'm curious because there is no mention of a haunting in the text of the article. Do you have a source or something that could be added to the text to support the categorisation. Thanks Kerry (talk) 22:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi there i was going from the reportedly haunted locations in the world article where it is included but here are a couple of sources. http://www.brisbanehistory.com/ghosts_of_brisbane.html http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/ghost-stories-from-brisbane/story-e6frep26-1225784427216 that could possibly be added to the article.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 22:36, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Many of your "gay-related" and "lesbian-related" categories are currently nominated for deletion. If they are deleted then these new ones you're creating will also be deleted. You are making more work for yourself and more work for others. Plaes STOP making these categories pending the outcome of the various discussions. Thank you. Buck Winston (talk) 23:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Gay Jews, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf _hideliho! 07:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Queer Jews, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 08:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional atheists, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf _hideliho! 11:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Please see the talk page of that category where I have asked two questions in response to your request that the category is not speedily deleted. Bencherlite^Talk 13:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit there, i'm still getting the hang of Hotcat's functions ツ Jenova20 ^(email) 22:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Please do not try to wiggle around the decision to upmerge all the "Gay men from Foo" categories into "LGBT people from Foo" categories by adding people to the "Gay men" category itself e.g. this edit. Such an approach is blatantly disruptive editing. Please undo all such edits at once, or I will have to ask for you to be blocked. Bencherlite^Talk 22:42, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

It is not wiggling out of it some of theme were in that category previously and diffused the gay men by country ones. many gay men are placed in that category when there is not a gay xx category to cover their occupation.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

note that I am not touching the ones with a gay xxx occupation category only looking for the ones not covered by such cats. please check before accusing.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 22:49, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

eg Jasper Conran he is cleary identified as gay with sources but does not have a gay occupation category covering him.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 22:53, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict x2) Well, as I read the discussion, the better view was that gay men should be in "LGBT people from Foo" categories, rather than categorised as "Gay men" per se; there are some "Gay (occupation)ers" categories, but not many; and even if you're right (and I dispute that) it certainly wouldn't explain the changes you've made to Louie Spence, would it? "LGBT people from England" category removed by you, "Gay men" AND "Gay entertainers" categories added by you. Now, will you undo your changes, or will I have to do it for you? Bencherlite^Talk 22:54, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

No because the likes of this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nigel_Wrench&diff=517765522&oldid=514577899 happened widely and they are being categorized like they were before. There was nothing to say that gay men shouldnt have any cats based on that at all but the arguments mostly seems to be against those cats by country.91.125.200.202 (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Apologies for the louis spence one I hadnt realised there had been an occ cat that covered him until a moment after I had put him in the parent cat.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 23:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Nobody at the discussion wanted the contents of "Gay men by nationality" upmerged into "Gay men", did they? (In fact, as user:Bearcat said, Category:Gay men and Category:Lesbians are not meant to have individuals in them, they are simply containers for occupational subcategories.) In any event, upmerger to "Gay men" wasn't the outcome of the discussion, so you are disrupting and attempting to subvert the CFD process.

And your claim that they are being categorised as they were is breathtakingly far from accurate - to give just three examples as I work through your edits:

1. Rupert Croft-Cooke: he was removed from "LGBT people from England" by you, and he was never in Category:Gay men until you put him there
2. Anthony Crank: ditto
3. Nicky Crane: ditto, and as he's already in Category:Gay pornographic film actors, your claim that you're not adding "Category:Gay men" where there is an occupational category is wrong too. Bencherlite^Talk 23:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

I am not claiming to be flawless I am going to go back through the gay men cat and check for mistaken doubling up of those cats once I am done.And I said some of them were there previously not nexxesarily all.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 23:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Also where does it say that the gay men category can not contain indivduals? I would dispute that as it has contained individuals for some time now. MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 23:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

I haven't found any article which you have tonight added to Gay men that was in it previously; can you show me one? As it currently stands (i.e. after undoing your handiwork from tonight), that category has about 30 names in - do you really think that it would have so few if it was generally accepted as the category to use for all gay men unless there happened to be an occupational category for them? Bencherlite^Talk 23:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

I had already pointed out http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nigel_Wrench&diff=517765522&oldid=514577899 MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 23:41, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I misunderstood the purpose of that diff you gave earlier. In any case, I have raised a question of the LGBT WikiProject here. Bencherlite^Talk 23:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Gay male adult models, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 00:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Bisexual models, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf _hideliho! 07:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

• Category:Bisexual models
  • And its even more specific subcategories Category:Bisexual male models, Category:Bisexual female models, Category:Bisexual male adult models
• Category:Fictional atheists
• Category:LGBT atheists, Category:LGBT agnostics
  • And their even more specific subcategories Category:Gay atheists, Category:Gay agnostics
• Category:Gay dancers
• Category:Gay Jews
  • And its even more specific subcategory Category:Gay orthodox Jews

All of these categories have two things in common. Firstly, the community has previously decided at WP:CFD that these categories should not exist (either directly or by obvious implication in the case of the more specific subcategories). Secondly, you recreated the previously deleted categories – and in some cases created a subcategory structure underneath – despite the clear message that comes up when you prepare to recreate a deleted page:

A page with this title has previously been deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

I cannot see anywhere that you have contacted the deleting adminstrator, let alone challenged the consensus at WP:DRV. So other editors, including me, have to waste time enforcing the previous decisions of the community by rearguing the matter at CFD (if the recreation is not spotted until after the CFD nomination), or removing the categories in question if it is.

Repeatedly recreating previously deleted material is grounds for blocking. Please do not do it again. Bencherlite^Talk 08:35, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

My apologies I am still learning the dos and don'ts on here. I will avoid recreating such deleted categories in future.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 20:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

All the images on commons are from a posed photoshoot. One of them is sufficient for illustrating what he looks like. The image of him with the guitar prop in that photoshoot is pretty marginal to use as an image in the discography section. A much better image for this section would be a candid of him performing, not just posing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Ghost Whisperer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf _hideliho! 09:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I have reverted this edit which removed sourced content without edit summary or explanation. Such sourced content should not be removed without talk page agreement. TerriersFan (talk) 01:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Try looking at the following edit. the school was moved to its own article per other scottish primary schools.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk)

My apologies; I missed the link. However, I created the content in this location because primary schools rarely survive deletion discussions, but we will see how it runs. TerriersFan (talk) 01:14, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

I think it shpuld be ok as it has non affiliated sources and the scottish primary schools category is getting quite big now. MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 01:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Around the World Hit Singles: The Journey So Far (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Deep, Around The World, House Of Love, It's Alright and Let It Rain

East 17: The Platinum Collection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Deep, Around The World, House Of Love, It's Alright and Let It Rain

Conspiracy of Silence (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Niall O'Brien, Jim Norton, Kevin McMahon and Catherine Walker

The Very Best of East Seventeen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Deep, Around The World, It's Alright and Let It Rain

Worlds Apart (boyband) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Together, The Brotherhood, Everybody and Here and Now

Déjà Q (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Enterprise and Shuttlecraft

Qpid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Vash and Riker

True Q (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Enterprise and Riker

A Present for Everyone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 3AM

Death Wish (Star Trek: Voyager) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Asylum

Evan Morgan, 2nd Viscount Tredegar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Honey bear

Q Who (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Phaser

Ross Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to R5

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop recreating articles as you did at Until You Loved Me without providing third party reliable sourcing to show that the article meets the requirements for a stand alone article. It is the WP:BURDEN of the editor wishing to add or restore material to provide proper verification from appropriate, third party reliable sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:56, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi can you take a look at it now as a managed to locate 3 sources? Thanks.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

It would be preferable to not add Horse breeds originating in (fill in nation) categories to the horse breed articles, for a number of reasons: First, history changes boundaries, as an example, the Lipizzaner originated within the Austria-Hungarian empire and now five different nations house the stud farms that provided the foundation stock. Second, there are nationalist issues, the Karabakh horse, for example, and the Azerbaijani horse -- get the "origins" wrong and we have edit wars. While a few people have just had an obsession with national tagging (for USA or France or Italy, or the UK, for example) and we sort of let them have their way, there is no real need to tag breeds with national origins absent some pressing faction demanding it, and if you get the nation wrong, it causes drama. So can you just not create new categories absent a clamor and demand from some specific nationalistic bunch that insists upon it? I'm not going to nom the cats fro deletion, but please don't waste your time trying to do all 350 breeds. Thanks. Montanabw^(talk) 17:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Would you PLEASE explain to me why you insist on adding unneeded (and sometimes incorrect) nation of origin tags to all the horse and donkey breed articles? It appears to be over-categorization in many, many cases (Latvia? Really?). I would like to engage in discussion with you as to why you think this is necessary because it appears to serve no logical purpose whatsoever. But, I actually AM open to hearing if there is a logical argument and discussing the issue. Montanabw^(talk) 22:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

If you disagree with categories please nominate them for cfd rather than simply emptying them.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

I DO like that you created Category:Donkey breeds. Perhaps that will solve the Donkey articles problem. On the rest, I would prefer to work this issue out with you without resorting to the dramah boards which will be long, rancorous, and generally a tendentious waste of time; an empty category is automatically deleted by bot if it stays empty long enough. If you have a good case to make for what you are doing, make it. Otherwise, I'll simply revert and only resort to CfD if you insist on not communicating about the issue. Montanabw^(talk) 00:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

MaybeMaybeMaybe, you have been editing for a comparatively short time and already received many complaints about your category-related edits. Far too many of your category creations are getting nominated for merging back into their original categories or for outright deletion; I've already had to warn you about recreating previously deleted categories when you've just ignored the previous discussion. Even when respected and knowledgeable editors like Montanabw ask you to explain and discuss, you seem to prefer to ignore them and carry on regardless. I think it's getting very close to the time when the community will need to discuss imposing involuntary restrictions on your editing, either in the form of a topic ban from categories or something even more severe, unless you learn from your mistakes and stop creating so many unnecessary categories. Bencherlite^Talk 00:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for adding a picture on Nico Mirallegro which better reflects his current appearance (rather than the one that is out of date, taken when he was 17, with a fan beside him). I realise now that you originally uploaded that older photo, which is why you wished to re-add it; I understand because I have uploaded photographs myself, only to have them deleted; even when written permission had been obtained for their use. A really good further refinement now, would be to ask the owner of one of the two recent football photos of Nico Mirallegro (on Wikimedia Commons page) if a cropped version could be used, showing mainly his head and shoulders. As he is an actor rather than a footballer, this would provide an image which, while not being a professional actor photograph, would not distract from his current career of being an actor. This would suffice as a good image for Nico Mirallegro until permission for use of TV and film images can be obtained. I think most photos on Wikimedia Commons can be adapted and cropped - with permission obtained from owner - if they are not overwritten but saved as a new image.

Kind regards, pinkyandrexa Pinkyandrexa (talk) 11:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

I see you have engaged in an edit war on Quagmire's Dad for several days now, and numerous other related articles. Please don't, and use the talk page as appropriate. Nymf _hideliho! 08:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Quagmire's Dad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, just wondered if you think this category was really worth creating since it only contains redirects that all point to the same article. –anemoneprojectors– 13:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

I think it is worth it for now at least as some have songwriting credits or significant coverage in their own right and I was going to ask about splitting some out.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure about this category, just wondered on your thoughts. I won't AFD it! I don't think it's worth splitting any of them out though. –anemoneprojectors– 14:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

It's been AFD'd now - note that at Category:Musicians by band it requests that categories are only made if at least two members have articles. –anemoneprojectors– 20:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Female actors in BDSM pornographic films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nymf _hideliho! 13:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Time to Stand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Damar, Garak and Nog

The Honking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Fry, Bender and Leela

Empok Nor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Garak and Nog

Call to Arms (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dukat

In the Cards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nog

Soldiers of the Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nog

Triple 8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Wilcox

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello! I just posted a deletion notice here. The artwork belonging to companies is under restricted copyright licensing unless they explicitly say otherwise. You linked a Wikipedia article to a Commons category for this. I appreciate the intent, but Wikimedia projects do not host non-free work. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Terry Unmarried, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Donna and Holt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Avenue (band), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:911 (band), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

I have nominated the above category for deletion and as per precedent. I also note you have created a couple of categories where there is no corresponding main article which I shall also nominate for deletion in due course - unless the relevant article appears. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Cavalry (Message me) 00:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC)