[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:MartinJamesHannon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello, MartinJamesHannon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.

Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!

P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.

Hello MartinJamesHannon,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Centre for macroeconomics, may be copied from http://www.centreformacroeconomics.ac.uk/aboutUs/aboutUs.aspx. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 10:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Centre for macroeconomics, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.centreformacroeconomics.ac.uk/aboutUs/aboutUs.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Centre for macroeconomics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kges1901 (talk) 10:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Centre for macroeconomics

[edit]

Hello MartinJamesHannon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Centre for macroeconomics for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 10:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MartinJamesHannon, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi MartinJamesHannon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

status

[edit]

As reviewing admin, I found it to be straight description, not promotion, and therefore did not delete it. But I doubt its actual notability for WP purposes under WP:ORG; most academic research centers of this sort have not been consider sufficiently notable in our rather peculiar sense to justify a separate article. To show notability under our rules, you need to add references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. DGG ( talk ) 00:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josve05a was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. (tJosve05a (c) 13:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]