User talk:Muslim Editor

Welcome!

Hello, Muslim Editor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 11:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why i can't preview any edited page?

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 07:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

When i edit a page and wants to see it's preview,it doesn't appears instead i'm redirected to edit page of respective article.

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 07:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have not come across this specific problem before. I suspect it is something wrong with your local setup - your browser settings perhaps, or some additional software such as a web filter/anti virus/whatever.

Could you please try the following;

• Reset everything - turn everything off and back on.

• If possible, try using a different browser - for example, if you use Microsoft Internet Explorer, try Firefox instead

• Check if the same thing happens when you are logged out, as well as logged in.

If you are still having problems, please give more details here - ie operating system, browser and version, any add-on software, if you have a firewall/anti-virus/anti-pop-up program, and details about what happens logged out.

For more help, you can either;

• Leave a message on my own talk page; OR
• Use a {{helpme}} - please create a new section at the end of your own talk page, put {{helpme}}, and ask your question - remember to 'sign' your name by putting ~~~~ at the end; OR
• Talk to us live, with this or this.

The last of those is particularly useful - please try it; pop in now and say hello.  Chzz  ►  12:30, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At Special:Preferences under the "Editing" tab, make sure there is a check mark at "Show preview before edit box". If you have a check mark and still don't see a preview then remove any check marks from these: "Use external editor by default", "Use external diff by default", "Use live preview". Did this help? PrimeHunter (talk) 01:30, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you guys!!

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 14:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

Ok,I created a userbox,It needs following templet to appear:

{ { U s e r b o x | b o r d e r - c = # 9 9 9 | b o r d e r - s = 1 | i d - c = g r e e n | i d - s = 1 4 | i d - f c = b l a c k | i n f o - c = # E E E | i n f o - s = 8 | i n f o - f c = b l a c k | i d = [ [ F i l e : M a s j i d N a b a w i . M e d i n a , S a u d i A r a b i a . j p g | 5 0 p x ] ] | i n f o = T h i s U s e r i n t e n d s t o v i s i t ' ' ' [ [ A l - M a s j i d a l - N a b a w i ] ] ' ' ' . | f l o a t = l e f t } }

templet gives this Userbox:

I want to make the templete shorter like this:

{ { U s e r : U B X / G o t o M a s j i d a l N a b a w i } }

What should i've to do???

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 13:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You just need to copy the code to the page you want. You can then transclude it. I hope this helps. Rock drum (talk·contribs·guestbook) 13:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Copy the code that you used to create that into a user sub-page, like User:Muslim Editor/Userbox 1. Then when you type {{User:Muslim Editor/Userbox 1}}, it should show up. :) Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you guys!

!!

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 14:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I saw that on Maulana, Andhe ki laathi you changed the WikiProject India template on the talk page to a WikiProject Islam one. Since pages can belong to more than one project, the correct thing to do would have been to add the Islam template without removing the India one. I see that you are a new editor, so welcome to the encyclopedia. This is just to let you know the usual practice.

I also moved your question on Requests for Feedback to WP:NPOVN, where you can look for replies. You might also want to add some more there about specific articles. Itsmejudith (talk) 10:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{Helpme}}

Sometimes,When i make an Internal link,it goes ineffective.

Eg. Portal:United States Air Force/News Archive/2009

becomes [[Portal:United States Air Force/News Archive/2009 ]]

That is because the end of the link goes to a new line. Might want to click preview before you save. That usually stops it for me. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 14:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever i creat a page,it's automatically marks the watch this page option,when i unmarks that option,it again gets marked when i edit that page. I've disabled the Watch pages i create and watch pages i edit options in my preferences setting but it still happens.

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 10:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This might be a problem with you web browser, make sure it is up to date, and then try again. You can always watch/unwatch a page by clicking the star at the top. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 14:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

What does destination filename mean on the page Special:Upload?

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 06:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is the name the the file will have on Wikipedia. Ideally it should be a descriptive name including the name of the subject and potentially dates or locations taken. You should not simply use the default existing name of the file (e.g. DSC0001.jpg). Regards.  7  06:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Examples: Select a descriptive filename for your upload. For example, "cat.jpg" is bad, while "Mongolian shorthair cat sleeping.jpg" is good.  7  06:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for awarding Barnstar!!

Coercorash^TalkContr. 10:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, saw your edits to Sunni Tehreek, and just wanted to point out WP:MOSISLAM, where editors have agreed that as a neutral encyclopedia Wikipedia doesn't use "(RA)" or "(PBUH)" or similar religious blessings on people. It's perfectly fine to use those off Wikipedia as your beliefs dictate, but since people of all religions use Wikipedia we avoid them for the sake of neutrality. That includes mentioning people by titles more than necessary to establish their identity (Maulvi, Maulana, etc), use of honorifics like "Hazrat", "Shaheed", etc. Otherwise various religious groups would go and lengthen hundreds of names to "His most splendid holiness, visionary of the future, martyr to the cause, Edward R. Thompson", so to keep it fair we just go by peoples' basic names. WP:MOSISLAM is a good read, so worth checking up on as you work on Islamic topics. MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you are correct, and the honorifics were in the draft prior to your edits. But your help would definitely be appreciated in removing honorifics, when you see them while editing. So far as POV, if you feel that I and Urduboy have POV biases that we're introducing, could you please point out exactly what those biases are? From my side, I'm seeing that he and I are removing material that subjectively praises the subject, or makes assertions that one religious group is the "right" one. I'm honestly failing to see how we're disparaging or promoting any given sect. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. warrior4321 01:25, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but can you tell me about which incident you are telling me? _Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 02:37, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This incident : User_talk:Coercorash#Please_vote.21. You share an amiable friendship with this user, and yet are asking him to vote in your image. That is votestacking. warrior4321 05:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,i will try hard to not to repeat this mistake.

I wanna ask the question that as while the discussion is over and the only voter supports it,what'll be next?When it going to be declared featured/non featured image?

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 08:46, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated an image for featured picture.And got one supporting vote.Voting has been closed many days ago.What next?

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 06:24, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wait or go look at the page on Featured picture nominations. --Lcawte/WebCoder11 (^Ta_lk) 06:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I see that you have been editing Wikipedia for a few months, so I wouldn't to alert you to a problem I just saw on the recent change page. Category:Saudi Arabians should be deleted in favor of the existing Category:Saudi Arabian people category. If you want to see why, check out WP:CAT for more information. I suggested that you place a deletion tag on the page to save everyone the trouble of a formal discussion. Thanks and good luck editing.--TM 16:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muslim Editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I edit pages via Opera mini. I'm a responsible editor and i hate vandalism. So please unblock me. As you can see My recent edits;reverts, were using twinkle. Which i can use only to revert edits and warn users and to add deletion tags on articles.I can't expand articles using twinkle So please unblock me.Thanks

Decline reason:

Closing this request. This appears to be being handled below and via checkuser. Jayron32 05:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 10:39, 17 July 2010 (UTC) It does expire on July 14. 2011. (X! · talk)  · @655  ·  14:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No.It didn't expired,even right now,whenever i click on edit,it says the IP Is blocked.

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 15:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note the year, please. I think what the blocker is saying is that opera mini is currently acting as an open proxy. Let me check with him. Kuru (talk) 18:27, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OH MY GOD! I didn't noticed the year!!!!! It's about a year to unblock!!!!! Noooooooooo!!!! I can't wait till than!!! Please,please unblock me!!!!

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 18:50, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let me apply the anonymous block exemption to this account for right now which should clear up your ability to edit while we wait for a response. Kuru (talk) 19:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another administrator and checkuser has asked for your patience while they review this range block; I'm afraid they have explictly asked to refrain from exemptions. I can see you've been editing in the meantime, so I presume you have other ways of accessing the site. Kuru (talk) 20:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You taught a Good lesson to "muslim" khan. May be he'll not vandalise the wikipedia and emerge as a responsible editor. So you too use Opera mini?Which version it is?One admin said that we(users affected by proxy block) can edit in about 2 days.And see i can edit right now.Please expand the a section of article about Ameer-e-Ahle Sunnat.

Coercorash^TalkContr. 13:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i see you recently added a unreferenced BLP tag to a section in Divyanka Tripathi. Tagging like that tags an entire article. For tagging a particular section use the

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

tag--Sodabottle (talk) 07:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Syed Ahmad Shaheed - I did respond, but I've moved my comments into an archive, User_talk:Chzz/Archive_25#Syed Ahmad Shaheed - I'm taking a bit of a break from Wikipedia, sorry.

You could submit it in WP:RM - requested moves.  Chzz  ►  18:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Neutrality of this article is disputed. Rivals of this university are adding biased but citated content,while pro-university editors are just blanking the text without any explanation.I'm confused about whether to keep the citated content or to remove it.

_Contribs Muslim Editor ^Talk 02:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remove, and have all parties discuss on the talk page. If an edit war is happening, request protection at WP:RFPP. —fetch·comms 02:10, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This template can only be used on articles created after March 18, 2010 - check the article history before tagging. (I've seen you tag a couple created after that date.) Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi i am Omer, i request your kind self to help me out to make the article Aisha a organized and model article for viewers, there are some users who had challenged the references of this article, and based on my research knowledge, references and poor comand on english, i am not able to work out for those, therfore kindly help me to make the article Aisha organized.

• and also in the article Zujajat al-Masabih written by Abdullah Shah Naqshbandi

hope you will accept this invetation.Thanks and please advice..--Omer123hussain123 (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox wali has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muslim Editor, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Assam u alaikum: I know your reputation for fighting vandalism especially o topics relating to Islam. I would like to appeal to you to stop two troublemakers who keep on vandalizing Roman Persian War article in a edit war that these two users have unjustly waged against me. Please block them as soon as possible. The IP that posted the personal vandalism on this page:

• LouisAragon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Kansas Bear (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  

Would appear to be the same person. Both LouisAragon and Kansas Bear are here to label editors and article biographies. I thank you sincerely for your understanding! Foleo (talk) 02:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]