User talk:46.31.172.101

Hello, I'm Wikipedialuva. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Russian Liberation Army have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipedialuva (talk) 08:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Greenwich pensioner—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 19:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. An edit you recently made to James Bowder seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 15:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Christopher Polhem, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Port Arthur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Winchester College football, you may be blocked from editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm REDACTED403. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of conflicts in Europe—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -REDACTED403 (talk) 12:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Timothy Hands. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. You have already been warned about making unconstructive edits. Please refrain from doing so further. Godtres (talk) 12:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Scott McTominay seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wiiformii (talk) 15:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scott McTominay. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Brealey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 46.31.172.101! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Geardona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 1921 Upper Silesia plebiscite have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Geardona (talk to me?) 16:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]