Wikipedia editor
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dante~enwiki. |
Hi, I'm Dante Perrotta.
I've been a Wikipedian since summer of 2005, and have had this account since summer of 2006.
I believe in what Wikipedia does, and I think it is tremendously noble and something the world needs. However, I do not think that enough people take it seriously or use it properly (including some of its own users). I have little tolerance for ignorance and misuse of authority, and while I hope to be the best Wikipedian I can, I hope not to be drawn into any arguments of a trivial nature.
I have little desire to be an administrator, furthermore I see no use for admins in an entity such as Wikipedia. As long as users respect each other and agree to take on threats such as vandalism together, then we don't need an army of admins wielding their collective banhammers and delete-rays whenever they see fit. Having said that, I still believe that Wikipedia is a good example of a Meritocracy, albeit with its shortcomings. But what organization (especially one with, as of this writing, over one-and-a-quarter million articles (now one-and-a-half million(now two-and-one-half-million))) doesn't have its problems?
I would say that my overall alignment in the Wikipedian philosophy is with the Exopedianists and the Inclusionists. I believe that all information is valuable, no matter how specific or insignificant it is. When I first came to this site I was given the impression that it is a summation of all human knowledge. Well, human knowledge is human knowledge - there's no reason that something shouldn't be included as long as there is some way to prove that it's true.
Oh, and while I think all the rules on Wikipedia are good ones (especially NPOV), the whole "Be Bold" thing could have been thought over much better. All the time I see random Wikipedians doing big edits, merges, and deletions to random pages, and after checking their userpages, I find they're not exactly knowledgeable on the subject they're contributing to (or in the case of deletions, detracting from). For example, if you're editing the Firearms page, I would certainly hope you've held one at some point in your life (and no, the musket your friend's dad has above his fireplace does not count, nor the airsoft gun at the local convenience store), and maybe even fired one. If not, you may want to think twice about clicking "edit this page".
I also believe that too much socializing on Wikipedia can distract users from what they're supposed to be doing, and bias them when discussing matters. This is an encyclopaedia, not a box social.
Anyways, that's my take! If you have anything to discuss, just hop onto my talk page :)
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Update with new information
Fix original research issues
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
Wikipedia:Babel |
---|
es-0 | Este usuario no entiende español (o lo entiende muy difícilmente). |
law-3 | This user (hereafter "User"), and all subsidiaries, agents, et al. acting on his/her/their/its behalf, herein manifest possession of, and are henceforth estopped from disclaiming, an advanced knowledge of Legalese, or access to such knowledge as to suffice as a reasonable substitute. |
pig-4 | Isthay userway eaksspay Igpay Atinlay atway away earnay-ativenay evellay. |
|
Search user languages |
| This user's time zone is EST. |
| This user is from Eris. |
1, 2, 3... | This userbox is a test. Please tell this user if you don't see it. |
| This user needs more userboxes. MORE, I tell you, more!!! Muhahaha! |
Too many userboxes | This user may have too many userboxes ... nah, no way!! |
| This user provides information using user boxes for religious reasons. |
Automotive
| This user cannot drive, but is planning to learn how to. |
| This user has heard of Eagle. |
|
Grammar
their there they're | This user thinks that there are too many people who don’t know that they're worse than their own children at spelling! |
to too two | This user thinks that too many people have no idea how to use words that they should have learned in grade two. |
who(m) | This user uses either who or whom in the object case. |
its & it's | This user understands the difference between its and it's. So should you. |
’s | Thi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice. |
… | This user is addicted to ellipses and has been known to use them indiscriminately... |
|
ANBU | This user is an ANBU. |
Sin City | This user knows that if you walk down the right back alley in Sin City, you can find anything... |
| This user took the red pill, not the blue pill. |
| A person is smart; people are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it! |
| This user is interested in The Jedi Order. My ally is the Force. And a powerful ally it is. |
X | This user plays the Xbox. |
| This user prefers the Wii. |
| This user still enjoys playing games on the NES. |
|