User:Blehfu/Sandbox/Musical improvisation

This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (October 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article needs attention from an expert in arts. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. WikiProject Arts may be able to help recruit an expert. (March 2009)

Musical improvisation is the spontaneous creative process of making music while it is being performed. Improvisation exists in almost all music, but is closely associated with particular genres such as blues, jazz, bluegrass, the Taqsim of Arabic and Turkish music, Indonesian gamelan, and Indian classical music. To use a linguistic analogy, improvisation is like speaking or having a conversation as opposed to reciting a written text.

Throughout the Medieval, Renaissance, Baroque, Classical, and Romantic periods, improvisation was a highly valued skill. Francesco Landini, Adrian Willaert, Diego Ortiz, Frescobaldi, J.S. Bach, Handel, Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin, Liszt, and many other famous composers and musicians were known especially for their improvisational skills. Though the evidence is sketchy, improvisation certainly played an important role in the monophonic period. The earliest treatises on polyphony, such as the Musica enchiriadis (ninth century), make plain that added parts were improvised for centuries before the first notated examples. However, it was only in the fifteenth century that theorists began making a hard distinction between improvised and written music (Horsely 2001). Many classical scores contained sections for improvisation, such as the cadenza in concertos, or the preludes to some keyboard suites by Bach and Handel, which consist solely of a progression of chords, which performers are to use as the basis for their improvisation. Handel, Scarlatti, and Bach all belonged to a tradition of solo keyboard improvisation that was not limited to variations, but included the concerto form, typically with moving voices in both hands, occasionally exploring fugue.

Generally, improvisation is prepared for via the theory and works of both classical and modern music (twelve-tone, minimalism, etc.). This historically retrograde stance of improvisation is due to the tradition of variation playing, but also the natural congruence of theme-variation structure with western music.^{[1][citation needed]} For these reasons, and because of the close of the common practice period, and further culminations of theory, any improvisation tonal or atonal might be marginalized, i.e., in relation to composition, whatever kind of preparation is made.^{[citation needed]}

Although melodic improvisation was an important factor in European music from the earliest times, the first detailed information on improvisation technique appears in ninth-century treatises instructing singers on how to add another melody to a pre-existent liturgical chant, in a style called organum.^[2] Throughout the Middle Ages and Renaissance, improvised counterpoint over a cantus firmus (a practice found both in church music and in popular dance music) constituted a part of every musician's education, and should be regarded as the most important kind of unwritten music before the Baroque period.^[3]

Original score notations for medieval organ music commonly include instructions for improvisation and embellishments.^{[citation needed]} The scales that were used were selected according to the same improvisational principles now used in jazz. When the single voice plainsong started to develop into the 2-, 3-, or 4-part organum (during the period 1000-1300 A.D.), one or more of the parts were also commonly improvised, weaving free counter-lines around the written melody line.^{[citation needed]}

Following the invention of music printing at the beginning of the sixteenth century, there is more detailed documentation of improvisational practice, in the form of published instruction manuals, mainly in Italy.^[4] In addition to improvising counterpoint over a cantus firmus, singers and instrumentalists improvised melodies over ostinato chord patterns, made elaborate embellishments of melodic lines, and invented music extemporaneously without any predetermined schemata.^[5] Keyboard players likewise performed extempore, freely formed pieces.^[6]

Eighteenth-century manuals make it clear that performers on the flute, oboe, violin, and other melodic instruments were expected not only to ornament previously composed pieces, but also spontaneously to improvise preludes.^[7]

In Baroque keyboard music, as well as for the lute and guitar, there are some basic progressions, away from the tonic and back, and in the circle of fifths. These are a good place to start improvising.^{[citation needed]} The melodies in these techniques are equally facilitated on the bowed string instruments, as well as wind instruments. It is not the treble lines which make the keyboard uniquely capable in fully outlining harmonic shifts, rather, it is the ability to add or sustain a bass note.^{[citation needed]} Melodic arpeggiation on a wind instrument is not unusually difficult.^{[citation needed]}

The pattern of chords in many baroque preludes, for example, can be played on keyboard and guitar over a pedal tone or repeated bass notes. Such progressions can be used in many other structures and contexts, and are still found in Mozart, but most preludes begin with the treble supported by a simple bass. J.S. Bach, for example, was particularly fond of the sound produced by the dominant seventh harmony played over, i.e., suspended against, the tonic pedal tone. Bach's Cantata BWV 54 uses this suspension as the opening chord in E-flat Major.

There is little or no Alberti bass in baroque keyboard music, and instead the accompanying hand supports the moving lines mostly by contrasting them with longer note values, which themselves have a melodic shape and are mostly placed in consonant harmony. This polarity can be reversed--another useful technique for improvisation--by changing the longer note values to the right hand and playing moving lines in the left at intervals--or with moving lines in both hands, occasionally. This shift of roles between treble and bass is another definitive characteristic. Finally, in keeping with this polarity, the kind of question and answer which appears in baroque music has the appearance of fugue or canon. This method was a favorite in compositions by Scarlatti and Handel especially at the beginning of a piece, even when not forming a fugue.

Improvised accompaniment over a figured bass was a common practice during the Baroque era, and to some extent the following periods.

There is one exception to the general pattern of loss in classical improvisation and that is in the role of the church organist. The organist's role includes the necessity of accompanying the movement of liturgy and filling voids of silence during church services, and guide the congregation in singing. This practice precludes the use of written music, primarily due to the extent, as well as the harmonic simplicity of the liturgy and hymns for which there is little or no pre-arranged accompaniment. As a result all practical organists are expected to extemporise in a manner appropriate to the atmosphere of the service. Within the upper ranks of church and cathedral organists, particularly in France, one is expected to be able to improvise in all compositional forms, including symphonic and sonata forms, and fugue.^{[citation needed]}

There is a tradition of improvised organ competition, because of the more solid foundation of organ improvisation.

The polyphony in late baroque music also lends itself to improvisation. One ought to avoid parallel fifths and parallel octaves in this style of classical playing,^{[citation needed]} except perhaps when playing chords in parallel, such as in Bach's Toccata and Fugue in D minor. If he was indeed the composer, here Bach ignored the prohibition.^{[citation needed]} In later music such exceptions apply more often.^{[citation needed]} Practicing polyphonic improvisation, one will mostly encounter the problem of parallel octaves. Contrary motion, and parallel thirds, sixths, and tenths are the basic methods of avoidance. Parallel fifths and octaves are noticeable to the ear, if not the more difficult to discern hidden fifths and hidden octaves, which are hard to find even in a written score.

Baroque melodic lines, in any case, are similar to the later homophonic styles, except that more passing tones are added. In Volume II of The World as Will and Representation,^[8] Schopenhauer discussed at some length the frequent shifts in baroque melodic passages between tonic and dominant. This element of theory, essential for improvisation, played an even clearer role in the later classical style.^{[citation needed]}

Fugue is another option and is rather difficult, though common practice among organists and some music theorists.^{[citation needed]} Adorno levelled two different arguments against fugue writing. On the one hand, he claimed that classicist fugue composition is so overshadowed by Bach, that it is unlikely to produce genuine art.^[9] Second, however, several pages later he elaborated his argument against a return to fugue, by criticizing atonal fugue writing as "functionless and technically false."^[10]

Fugue composition is a better introduction to this form than improvisation.^{[citation needed]} To begin learning to improvise short fugues, however, it is helpful merely to play a fugue subject and attempt to add an answer in another voice, i.e., to play an exposition. Or one may begin by playing a one voice improvisation with occasional statements of the subject. If the two voice fugues are practiced consistently, the next step is to add a third voice.

Classical music after the baroque period involves less polyphony, and a basso continuo is no longer common.^{[citation needed]} However, it also departs from baroque style in that sometimes several voices may move together as chords involving both hands, to form brief phrases without any passing tones. Though such motifs were used sparingly by Mozart, they were taken up much more liberally by Beethoven and Schubert. Such chords also appeared to some extent in baroque keyboard music, such as the 3rd movement theme in Bach's Italian Concerto. But at that time such a chord often appeared only in one clef at a time, (or one hand on the keyboard) and did not form the independent phrases found more in later music. Adorno mentions this movement of the Italian Concerto as a more flexible, improvisatory form, in comparison to Mozart, suggesting the gradual diminishment of improvisation well before its decline became obvious.^[11]

Beginning with J.C. Bach and W.A. Mozart, musical phrases often form more punctuated structures of question and answer.^{[citation needed]} The introductory gesture of "tonic, subdominant, dominant, tonic," however, much like its baroque form, continues to appear at the beginning of high-classical and romantic piano pieces (and much other music) as in Haydn's sonata Hob.16/No. 52 and Beethoven's opus 78.

Schubert's sonatas are closely related to improvisation.^{[citation needed]}

Different moods are associated with classical improvisation.^{[citation needed]} Beethoven and Mozart cultivated slightly new musical moods. These are often indicated by mood markings such as con amore, appassionato, cantabile, and expressivo. In fact, it is perhaps because improvisation is spontaneous that it is akin to the communication of love.^[12]

Beethoven and Mozart leave excellent examples of what their improvisations were like, in the sets of variations and the sonatas which they published, and in their cadenzas. Their duels featured practices similar to jazz, such as the famous "trading fours" and trading eights, in which jazz musicians share choruses of a standard tune, often with some degree of competitive spirit recalling the cutting contests of the Harlem stride era.

Mozart left an unfinished Fantasia in d minor, and a harmonic prelude that he intended to serve as exemplary of his habitual modulations when improvising.^{[citation needed]} Beethoven, on the other hand, expressed regret at how little he had finally published in terms of keyboard instruction (his planned "piano method"), and his hard-won improvisatory battles over such rivals as Johann Nepomuk Hummel and Joseph Woelfl are relegated to obscure legends, informed by published themes with variations. But it is clear that Beethoven emerged triumphant within a large society of Viennese keyboard improvisors who were determined to wrest the top position from him.^{[citation needed]}

The improvisations of Mozart and Beethoven, however, had no true rivals in their time.^{[citation needed]} Furthermore, theme variation and keyboard exploration were essential avenues by which they conceived music. Many of Beethoven's themes, especially those belonging to the heroic period, for example, focus heavily on the first inversion of the major triad, melodically, and this triadic signature of Beethoven's, also known as the "chord of nature" can be traced to certain themes of Mozart such as the "Ah, Perdona, al Primo Affetto" duet from Mozart's La clemenza di Tito.^{[citation needed]} Beethoven played variations on this aria during one of his concerts in Prague in the late 1790s, (possibly at the famous 'Konvikt' residence which is today a bar on the ground floor).^{[citation needed]}

As composers, Beethoven and Mozart were not distinguished so much by altering the established modulatory and melodic vocabularies, but by molding these vocabularies into a personal signature that left the established structures largely intact.^{[citation needed]} Adorno described Mozart's musical texture as an unshakable formal rigor always pushed to the brink of apparent chaos.^[13] Beethoven's, on the other hand, he described with somewhat more reverence as a "continuum of nothing" indicating again its extemporaneous quality.^[14] Adorno credited Beethoven with making the high classical style capable of individual expression, but this claim is quite debatable.^{[citation needed]}

Improvisation is a form of composition.^{[citation needed]} To improvise in the late 18th and early 19th century style without departing from it for reasons of individual expression or theory would be to compose in it. The difficulties inherent in this are impressing individual expression into tonal music, and avoiding the social implications and historical trappings that belong to the period in which the style was popular. It is probably this set of dilemmas, and not the intimidating genius of either Bach or Beethoven, that prevents such anachronistic improvisation on a wide scale.^{[citation needed]}

It is appropriate to discuss Western Classical music last because it really represents the exception rather than the rule in music making.^{[citation needed]} Improvisation is such a natural mode of music making that its absence should be regarded as unusual. It should also be recognised that it is only in relatively recent history that improvisation has essentially dropped out of Western Classical music completely.^{[citation needed]} As dance, for example, became more generalized in form, improvisation lost a great deal of its individuality with respect to form, placing more of the task of differentiation on the interpreters.^{[citation needed]} After this event, the era of expressionism had begun to develop. Composers^{[weasel words]} did not want to return to trying new combinations of old materials. Instead, they entered into a period of radical structural exploration, that helped give rise to modernism.^{[citation needed]} On this view, modernism arises as a reactionary movement to romantic banality, but at the same time modernism retained something of the kind of expressivism achieved by Beethoven, which is said to involve a truth content in addition to a purely sensual or emotive aspect.^[15]

The exhaustiveness of theory and technique in the mid-Romantic period, moreover, also gave rise to skepticism about the spirituality of music, issues faced by Wagner (see modernism and existentialism).^{[citation needed]} Wagner, in turn, and his milieu inspired the beginnings of modernism, and new modes of individual, more spiritual expression which, for better or worse, took Beethoven as their ultimate guide.^{[citation needed]} Though there were exceptions, some such new views^{[weasel words]} were opposed to improvisation as belonging to a casual, non-intellectual creative process, or were too pre-occupied to take it up. At the same time, the romantic period still produced composers who were very much interested in improvisation, such as Brahms.

Finally, improvisation was a divertissement of the aristocracy, whose self-identity changed dramatically after the early 19th century. These trends appear to have had their beginnings in the period just after Beethoven, but only finally reached completion in the last quarter of the 19th Century, which also coincides closely with the emergence of atonality. The process also suggests a correlation between improvisation and the popularity and familiarity of music, linking it to the greatly varied melodies of opera and folk music.

It is very helpful in classical improvisation, as it is in jazz playing, to break down the major and minor scales by assigning alternative harmonies for each note of the scale.^{[citation needed]} To make this task even simpler, on any instrument, one may begin by playing single notes and experimenting with possible accompaniment harmonies for them as played by a pianist. This may seem to lead to a habitual and oversimplified chordal left hand for the solo pianist, but there are many ways to avoid such constraints. The left hand harmonization can be reversed, for example, by harmonizing bass notes with two or more notes in the right hand. If bass notes are played a few octaves below a chord, for example, this does not imply that the bass notes become melodic, rather, more of the harmonization has merely been shifted to the right hand.

The first four notes of the major scale, for example, can be harmonized as I, V, I, V, or I, v (minor), I, IV, or I, V, I, IV, or I, V, VI (dominant 7th), ii. Homophonic structure such as this is one of the first steps to improvisation, and it is also the basis of some of the idioms common in mid-18th century homophony.

Another useful technique is the harmonization or adding of tones directly within melodic lines. This may involve the use of extra passing tones in a repeating pattern, or a series of arpeggios.

Typically, the phrase leading to an authentic cadence in Mozart, Haydn, Schubert, and to some extent in Beethoven, is preceded by a deceptive cadence on the submediant, which is also minor (Aeolian mode) to be answered by the authentic cadence. In this case question and answer taken together can be thought of as one phrase.

Improvisers might also reverse the method of harmonization by creating melodies over existing and well-known harmonic progressions, such as Bach's Prelude to the aforementioned fugue, and many other ground basses or passacaglias such as the Spanish Folia. An improvisor who wishes to become more serious about playing variations might then try some of Mozart's arias, which at one time were prime territory. More freedom and inspiration might be derived from applying alternative sections or endings to various sonatas, sonatinas and other works of the 18th or 19th century.

Modulation involves the distance of certain harmonies from the tonic triad, and how one might arrive at and depart from harmonies, via cadences and phrases. It treats music like a harmonic map in which harmonies are destinations or residences. This is important for understanding classical idioms but it does not mean that one must imitate exactly any particular composer. Modulation is greatly aided by the Circle of Fifths, but in two different senses. The true circle of fifths is simply the entire array of possible tonic destinations, in order. A diatonic circle, on the other hand, is used mostly for intermittent sequences, forming phrases that follow the circle in a pleasing pattern. The circle of fifths itself may be used for this. But in this case it is usually found in a broad sequence that has more tension in its transitions (Mozart's 24th Piano Concerto, K. 491, first movement, mm. 338-350).^[16] The true circle of fifths shows all 12 keys usually as major keys.^{[citation needed]} From the point of view of any one of the 12, the circle appears as a series of dominants or subdominants in either direction, depending on how they are interpreted.

The "diatonic circle" or adjusted circle keeps within the tonic key signature, creating a much shorter circle of modes, each of a different quality, which still may be adjusted in modulation. The chords created by this circle, or simply by playing a triad shape through the major scale,^[17] help make certain modulations and cadences smoother and less harsh, i.e., they form the secondary dominants. In the late classical style, the supertonic is often used, and would be harmonized as a minor triad (Dorian mode).^{[citation needed]} The diatonic circle, within a particular key, is played as a sequence, a technique polished in the Baroque period, for the purpose of cadencing either on the tonic or the dominant.^{[citation needed]} Typically in Bach this sequence starts on the tonic, but then moves within the dominant key. In Mozart, by contrast, at least in the major key version that he typically used, it begins on the dominant or on any tonic chord, and proceeds in the key of the initial harmony of the sequence. Mozart and other classical composers did not revert to the minor key version of such a sequence, which remains a strictly baroque idea.^{[citation needed]}

An improvisor approaches this series of harmonies, in other words, with the question whether to revert to a neighboring key signature.^{[citation needed]} But the goal of the sequence is usually the dominant. Mozart used this motif very often. While it is true that the third scale degree, for example, produces a minor triad, in Mozart's embellishment of it (and to some extent Bach's) it is articulated as a Phrygian mode, which reveals its character more clearly.

Though classical music makes use of modes in several ways, it generally differs from jazz, however, in the following way. In both classical and jazz there are frequent accidentals, but in jazz, many of the transitions that give rise to these are more streamlined. In classical music, on the other hand, the harmonic shifts are more emphasized, rather than merely moving from one mode to another--such as in modulation to the supertonic or relative minor (submediant).^{[citation needed]} Jazz, therefore, is more modal.

Classical improvisors tend to impose minor scales within major key phrases. For example, the supertonic and submediant are outlined by melodic lines using the melodic minor--not the modes that correspond to the tonic key signature.

Jazz is more free in the alteration of scales, lest it might have a stilted and not "hip" sound.^{[citation needed]} This is yet more the case in later jazz (Many late romantic and early modern composers, however, such as Rachmaninov, make harmonic use of modes that are of linear use in jazz such as the fifth mode of the melodic minor, or Mixolydian flat-6).

Mozart, on the other hand, experimented with modal passages a great deal, in particular in the Piano Concerto in c K. 491 (a personal favorite of Beethoven, who played it at his Vienna debut in March, 1795).^{[citation needed]} In the K. 491 there are a few scale passages in the first movement where Mozart appears to have been uncertain about what mode to use.^[18] In modern jazz one has the option of respecting the modes of harmonies in modulation, playing them as modes, in addition to many further modes derived from the melodic minor and harmonic minor scales themselves.^{[citation needed]}

Besides theme and variation, there are many kinds of musical score or blueprint that apply to improvisation, as well as different times in which the score might actually be prepared. An improviser could start from no overall structure, and merely explore familiar and unfamiliar patterns and shapes. Or he could prepare an outline ahead of time, one which might not restrict him to a harmonic or melodic progression, or on the other hand, create or prepare the outline on the spot. Finally it is at least possible to imagine composing the entire piece on the spot before playing it. Musical improvisation is thus like the traditions of storytelling, stand-up comedy, commedia dell'arte, and improvised poetry, since many experts in those arts use an outline.^{[citation needed]}

Toward the end of the section of Aesthetic Theory entitled "Art Beauty" (in the English edition), Theodor Adorno included a brief argument on improvisation's aesthetic value. Claiming that artworks must have a "thing-character" through which their spiritual content breaks, Adorno pointed out that the thing-character is in question in the improvised, yet present.^[19] It may be assumed Adorno meant classical improvisation, not jazz, which he mostly excoriated. He held jazz, for example, to be antithetical to Beethoven.^[20] There is more extensive treatment, essentially about traditional jazz, in Prisms and The Jargon of Authenticity.^[21]

Improvisation is one of the basic tenets of jazz. Typically in a jazz piece, the "head" (the song's melody along with any backing harmony) is played once by the musicians and often repeated. Improvisation by any of the musicians follows, and this is typically the longest section of a song as each musician improvises their own melody over the harmonic and rhythmic foundation of the head. When the end of the head is reached it is repeated and a solo's length is specified by the number of repetitions of the head necessary. After one musician has finished improvising, another will begin, and no instrument is forbidden from improvising. A repetition of the head will usually end a jazz piece. There are many variations to this pattern; new sections can be added before and after the head, two musicians can alternatively improvise for short amounts of time (known as "trading"), or several musicians can improvise in a group (collective improvisation is common in Dixieland jazz).

Many varied scales and their modes can be used in improvisation. These mainly depend on the nature of the harmonic framework. Against a C Minor seventh chord, for example, an improvisor would usually have a choice of using C Dorian, C Aeolian, C blues, and others, depending on the situation and personal taste. Chord changes are very important in jazz improvisation as well. Whole solos can be built around chord tones. The variety is achieved with the rhythmic aspects of the solo.^{[citation needed]}

In the bebop era of jazz in the early 1950s there was a common theme of urgency and technical proficiency. Performers would often construct intricate melody lines at speeds of up to 300BPM (Beats Per Minute).^{[citation needed]} These improvisations varied considerably from the song's main melody.^{[citation needed]} The modal era of jazz, mainly started by Miles Davis,^{[citation needed]} moved the harmonic framework for a piece from the fast, dynamic chord progressions of bebop to more static, relaxed chords with longer durations. The prevailing tendency of modal performers was to improvise not over specific chords, but in a musical mode instead.^{[citation needed]} Free jazz performers eschew the explicit harmonic framework for improvisation; the harmony in free jazz is less rigid and less traditional.

Improvisation is absolutely essential for jazz musicians.^{[citation needed]} Illinois Jacquet, for example, is best known for a single solo on the tune Flying Home, and such solos are often transcribed. They are often not written down in the process, but they help musicians practice the jazz idiom. In university jazz programs, transcription tends to be the main weekly assignment in improvisation class.^{[citation needed]} Charlie Parker's improvisations were distinctive, helping to shape the bebop period. Though it is helpful to transcribe on one's own, Parker's solos are often studied in a published collection known as the Omni Book, and groups such as Supersax arrange his solos with their own harmonic backing. Often, an improvised melody can give rise to an entirely new jazz head.^{[citation needed]}

Vocal jazz improvisations is known as scat singing and made up from syllables that help articulate jazz phrasing.^{[citation needed]}

Improvisors like Say and Montero gravitate towards jazz and a fusion with classical music. It is very difficult to untangle jazz and improvisation (and perhaps not possible or necessary), conceptually or in the popular consciousness.^{[citation needed]}

Top performers include pianists Leslie Howard, Robert D. Levin, and Dudley Moore.^{[citation needed]} On the other hand, there are pianists who blend classical idiom with jazz and rock such as Fazil Say, Gabriela Montero, Jacques Loussier, or the David Rees-Williams Trio, and there are the jazz interpretations of John Bayless.^{[citation needed]} The roots of synthesizing jazz and baroque music are not new, however, but date back to earlier artists such as Art Tatum, P.D.Q. Bach and The Swingle Singers.^{[citation needed]} Between these two stylistic groups, classicist embellishment and classical-jazz, which are in fact radically different, an unacknowledged controversy may rage. It is the idiomatically more free group that has the widest popularity and list of exponents.^{[citation needed]}

It may be pressed to derive something novel from past material, which becomes outmoded through its limited concepts of tonality, form, and variation. Glenn Gould spoke of these factors, for example, when he declared that "all the basic statements have been made for posterity," by which he may have meant the complete arsenal of basic approaches to composition and expression.^[22] In this claim, Gould refers to the passing away of both common practice style and its modern alternatives. Though his understanding of modern music was itself unorthodox, he clearly thought musical history was a finite exploration of forms and tonal concepts, and exhaustible.^[23][24]

The crisis of music theory, however, was one of the primary reasons Gould focused on interpretation as an art in studio recording. He sought extra time for interpretation and analysis, which he said was impossible on the concert stage, moreover, he was biased against concert performance for other reasons.^[25] In post-baroque music he often found traditional interpretation stale and boring. Gould's technique, which convinced many listeners, became conspicuous in some areas other than Bach and Beethoven. For example, he felt that Mozart could be hackneyed enough, even to cast doubt on the composer's own authority for form and development. Sometimes Gould wanted to "get [the listener's] hackles aroused" as well as to allow a coherent build of expression across less holistic works.^[26] Though himself an improviser, he did not seriously consider it as an alternative to the classical repertoire.^{[citation needed]} Despite his desire for spontaneity, in recordings he found a permanence akin to that of composition.^{[citation needed]}

Glenn Gould was said to improvise in the style of Beethoven and others.^[27]

While the first half of the twentieth century is marked by an almost total absence of actual improvisation in art music (Griffiths 2001), since the 1950s, contemporary composers^{[weasel words]} have placed fewer restrictions on the improvising performer, using techniques such as vague notation (for example, indicating only that a certain number of notes must sound within a defined period of time). New Music ensembles formed around improvisation were founded, such as the Scratch Orchestra in England; Musica Elettronica Viva in Italy; Lukas Foss's Improvisation Chamber Ensemble at the University of California, Los Angeles; Larry Austin's New Music Ensemble at the University of California, Davis; the ONCE Group at Ann Arbor; the Sonic Arts Group; and Sonics, the latter three funding themselves through concerts, tours, and grants. Significant pieces include Foss's Time Cycles (1960) and Echoi (1963) (Von Gunden 1983, 32).

Other composers working with improvisation include Cornelius Cardew, Alvin Curran, Stuart Dempster, Hugh Davies, Karlheinz Essl, Vinko Globokar, Pauline Oliveros, Terry Riley, Frederic Rzewski, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Richard Teitelbaum, Christian Wolff, Vangelis, La Monte Young, John Zorn and Yitzhak Yedid.

Several pianists also teach classical improvisation and perform, such as David Dolan,^[28] William Goldstein,^[29] Yitzhak Yedid and Eric Barnhill.^[30]

• Free improvisation
• Improvisation in music therapy
• Impro-Visor (software)
• Indian Classical Music
• Comparative View of Jazz and Indian Classical Music
• List of free improvising musicians and groups
• Musical collectives
• Musics (magazine)
• Prepared Piano
• Prepared guitar

• guitar:improvising improvising for guitar in wikibooks
• harmonica/improvising improvising for harmonica in wikibooks
• International Society for Improvised Music
• Music for People catalyst in gathering people together to play and sing by creating safe environments in which they can explore music improvisation
• Robert Levin on Improvisation in Classical Music
• How to Improvise Jazz Melodies, by Bob Keller
• iwasdoingallright:Learning to Improvise Several articles discussing the challenges most people face with jazz improvisation. Includes free online ear training tools with jazz improvisation exercises.
• Improvisation and the Classical Musician Blog and book-in-progress by cellist Eric Edberg
• The Daily Improvisation Blog of improvised music and articles by pianist and Dalcroze teacher Eric Barnhill
• Jazz improvisation theories Harmony, theories and techniques on jazz improvisation by Italian pianist and songwriter Musilosophy.
• Feza Neverd Original improvised music recordings.
• Improvisation on Improvisation: Karlheinz Essl and Jack Hauser talking about musical improvisation
• Losing Control: Indeterminacy and Improvisation in Music Since 1950: by Sabine Feisst
• A Jazz Improvisation Primer by Marc Sabatella Information about jazz improvisation.

Category:Improvisation Improvisation Category:Jazz techniques