Template talk:WikiProject Cricket

Template:WikiProject Cricket is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. › Cricket This template is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles WikiProject Cricket To-do list: edit history watch purge Article assessment Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details Verifiability Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards Cleanup There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format) Infoboxes Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes Cricket people Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class. Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket. Create articles for redlinks present here and here Cricket teams & countries Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe; Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams Create articles about cricket in these missing countries Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI Images Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here On this day in cricket Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries Umpires Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel Women Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours Update A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains Regularly updating cricketers' career stats. Other Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

I just removed a few of the tags that I thought was too specific to be used on cricket articles. If I've done something wrong, feel free to revert, but it just didn't seem sensible to have a lot of parameters that aren't going to be used much. Sam Vimes 11:33, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no problem. I just left them on initially because I thought we would run into conflicts with some of the other WikiProjects that have their templates on cricket articles, such as Sydney Cricket Ground (Sydney WikiProject). --mdmanser 11:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The coding does not seem to allow for a List class, but it would be useful if it did. —Moondyne 04:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new updated version of this template which uses the meta-template {{WPBM}} is on the /sandbox. Would there be any comments/concerns about using it? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have now implemented this. Please let me know if there are any problems. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This template is defaulting to an uppercase "Unknown", however several of the unknown categories (as can be seen at Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles) use a lowercase "unknown". This is breaking categorization of pages such as Talk:1958–59 Ashes series. --Pascal⁶⁶⁶ 08:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There certainly needs to be consistency. Which do you prefer? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whichever is most prevalent outside of this particular template. --Pascal⁶⁶⁶ 13:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most wikiprojects have a master category for their projects, Category:WikiProject_Iran_articles, Category:WikiProject_Football_articles,Category:WikiProject_Oregon_pages, Category:WikiProject_Motorcycling_articles, Category:WikiProject_Metal_articles as examples. I would suggest doing it for this project too for organizational and statistical purposes. β^_command 20:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wikiproject members, I added the category please let me know if this is a problem. This is so your project can get the bot information mentioned at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cricket#Bot_which_automatically_updates_unreferenced_biography_of_living_persons_daily Thanks.Okip (formerly Ikip) 02:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've noticed that several changes have been made to the template this year and it no longer populates the various x-Class cricket articles of ZZZ-importance sub-categories. Can you please investigate and rectify if possible. I could probably fix it myself if I still had edit access so please let me know if I can assist. Thanks.

Jack | ^{talk page} 20:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BlackJack: It appears that Nazcheema (talk · contribs) broke it in this edit - there is no such parameter as |HOOK_QUALIMP=. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Check subcats of Category:Cricket articles by quality and importance now. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:06, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64: Hello, RedRose. That's brilliant. Yes, I understand the problem. And he obviously didn't do a full "system test" and check the interfacing categories. Well done and thanks for saving me a job. Jack | ^{talk page} 10:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Somerset cricket task force is inactive now. Should be marked as inactive in the banner as well. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 01:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 05:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

New set of taskforces have been added to the WikiProject as per this discussion. Amended banner shell is available at Template:WikiProject Cricket/sandbox. It should be published to the main banner. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. TfD is the proper place to handle template mergers. Gonnym (talk) 06:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: This is just addition of new taskforces and some note stuff, which has nothing to do with template mergers or the ongoing TfD. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 09:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what the TfD is about. Still oppose. Gonnym (talk) 09:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym Would you mind clarifying what would exactly be done if the TfD is made consensus to merge... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 09:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I actually would mind. I don't like having discussion in two places. That is a question for the TfD, which I can answer there. Gonnym (talk) 09:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me; but just for the record, I placed this request here 3 hours before it was nominated at the TfD and the draft was made about 4 weeks ago, so this is where the discussion actually begun anyways. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 10:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]