Why Template:CSS1 instead of just Template:CSS? --Execvator (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because it has already existed... --Sky6t (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst not challenging the basic notability of Dynamic CSS, I would question if this obscure (and IMHO, usually wrong-headed) technique has the sort of major-league significance that warrants it being the lead link in the {{CSS}} sidebar nav template? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As of now (9 years later), this link has been removed from the template (not by me). If anyone reading this is interested, I nominated that page for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dynamic_cascading_style_sheets_(2nd_nomination).

Anton.bersh (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]