Talk:Workman Publishing Company

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why was this speedily deleted only minutes after it was created. It was labeled as a stub and was being worked on. While I understand the need to remove articles which are only advertisements, articles have to start somewhere. Had this article sat there in that form for weeks, by all means remove it. But at least give me and anyone else a chance to improve it.Rtphokie 16:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have not explained how this company meets the notability guidelines; the hangon tag is to let admins know to look here for your explanation of how this company meets those guidelines. -FisherQueen (Talk) 16:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't gotten the chance to complete the article before it was deleted. Please restore it and give me the chance to add history and other items which will display it's notability. This is a well respected publishing company which brings in smaller publishing companies and expands their reach. Rtphokie 17:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the earlier version undeleted, all you need to do is explain briefly how this company meets the notability criteria at Deletion review. It would help if you had two or three independent sources to verify the information. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this book gave me much help in self controle —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.195.248.252 (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting comment about The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene and Joost Elffers. But why is it here? JHvW 19:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. They did the Audio, under their Highbridge division. Dont think we need to mention audio books originally published by other companies. original audios, yes. Its nice to have a list of major works from a publisher (ie links to book articles).(mercurywoodrose)12.125.80.214 (talk) 16:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Workmen.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Workman Publishing Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081012091016/http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA601494.html to http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA601494.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

According to the article on WP:FR, Hachette acquires Workman :

En août 2021, Hachette Livre annonce l'acquisition de Workman Publishing pour 240 millions de dollars^[1][2].

I guess this should be translated and added to the article…

2A02:2788:228:93D:9190:8A11:67B7:ECD4 (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]