[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:We've Come for You All

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWe've Come for You All has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 8, 2013Good article nomineeListed
March 2, 2014Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:We've Come for You All/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiRedactor (talk · contribs) 16:45, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to offer some thoughts! WikiRedactor (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • A couple external links that need to be corrected. Done
  • I'd like to see flat lists and start date templates applied to the infobox. Done

More to come... WikiRedactor (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Instead of the current headings of:
  1. Background and recording
  2. Release
  3. Reception
  4. Music
  5. Track listing
  6. Personnel
  7. References

I recommend rearranging it to follow the format:

  1. Background and recording
  2. Composition (renamed from Music)
  3. Critical reception
  4. Release and commercial performance (renamed from Release)
  5. Track listing
  6. Credits and personnel (renamed from Personnel)
  7. Charts (new section/table)
  8. Release history (new section/table)
  9. References
  • Since there are only three musicians in the Guest Musician(s) column of the track listing, can you add those as notes (ie. "featuring XYZ") so that column can be removed? Or are featured artists listed differently in metal music than pop albums?

The article looks pretty solid to me, I can't find any major issues. After these comments have been addressed, I'll take another look at the article, but I shouldn't have a problem passing this. WikiRedactor (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did all the requests. And really thanks for the review, you saved me from waiting another two months for a reviewer.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 18:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure! Good work with the article! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Orphaned references in We've Come for You All

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of We've Come for You All's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "PopMatters":

  • From Anthems (Anthrax album): Maçek, J.C. "Anthrax: Anthems". PopMatters. Retrieved August 24, 2013.
  • From Worship Music (album): Coglan, Chris (September 28, 2011). "Anthrax: Worship Music". PopMatters. Retrieved August 23, 2013.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 20:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden Tracks?

[edit]

Not sure which version has "We're a Happy Family" on it as a hidden track. On my version (U.S.), the only thing resembling a "hidden track" is W.C.F.Y.A. which is 7:17. The first part goes until 4:09 and then at 6:11 something comes in that sounds like a rattle and someone muttering incoherently in the background. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]