[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:WJBE-FM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Split

[edit]

The section on James Brown's WJBE, it seems to me, would probably be better off in its own article; this article could have a single sentence mentioning that this radio station is different than that one, and then link to the other article if readers want to get the whole history of that other radio station. Dablinks could be used to link the two articles. Any thoughts? —Politizer talk/contribs 05:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did consider creating a "WJBE (defunct)" article but given my current lack of access to specific resources that would allow me to expand that much beyond the couple of paragraphs I wrote I felt it was better to keep it as a small section of a larger article on the current WJBE. The current WJBE article will be easier to expand so as not to put undue emphasis on the previous station with those call letters. If sufficient reliable sources can be found that would expand a potential "WJBE (defunct)" article then a split would certainly be in order. - Dravecky (talk) 06:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WJBE-FM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]