Talk:WINP-TV

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pennsylvania Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pittsburgh Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

If John McCain were not running for President, would the Controversy section be as long as it is? I think most of that section can be edited down or transferred to a more appropriate article.--Sand Squid (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problems at WQED are (or were) huge, enough so that an entire book was written on the topic - more than eight years ago. WQEX was one of the casualties of this mess, national programming origination from WQED another. There's no reason to edit down something of this severity, and WQEX/WQED are indeed the appropriate articles. --I613 (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The citations do not appear to support the language used. The Jerrold Starr article cited at the beginning of the section, for example, does not use the word "bloated," the term "top heavy management" or the phrase "long history of mismanagement." More careful use of sources is imperative. Otherwise, this comes off as a hatchet job that threatens Wikipedia's integrity and credibility. But even with more solid scholarship, I'm sure the writeup could be halved and still make its point. Readers wanting this much detail should buy Starr's book. Allreet (talk) 00:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WINP-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20010711004147/http://www.cs.cmu.edu:80/~smonti/wqex/schneider2.html to http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~smonti/wqex/schneider2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WINP-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There seriously has to be a small section about QEX's legendary and hilarous sign-offs. I don't have the knowledge about their origin and creation, but so many Pittsburghers went to bed smiling and laughing because who expects a comedy sketch for a sign-off? Can anyone help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:541:200:B:50E:707D:E6E:8AF0 (talk) 07:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]