[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

Talk:Vitor Belfort

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

this page needs a picture could someone please add one?

record

[edit]

the article claims belforts record is 18-8, but the ufc website says he is 12-5. i guess 12-5 sounds better than 18-8. typical ufc bullship. it's a good thing dana white doesn't write history books for a living. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.143.189 (talk) 13:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC) It looks like someone has vandilized Belfort's official record, it is not 27-0[reply]

vs. Fedor

[edit]

(Stop changing it) this is the only thing. http://mmajunkie.com/news/15592/with-josh-barnett-out-vitor-belfort-makes-verbal-commitment-to-face-fedor-emelianenko-at-affliction-trilogy.mma User:Forrestdfuller(talk) 21:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No he has since accepted the match. Read fightnetwork. http://www.thefightnetwork.com/news/mma/4020/exclusive__emelianenko_vs_belfort_official3 Jonhan (talk) 21:49, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's one source.Nobody else has it.nothing is offical User:Forrestdfuller (talk) 21:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another source. http://mmajunkie.com/news/15592/with-josh-barnett-out-vitor-belfort-makes-verbal-commitment-to-face-fedor-emelianenko-at-affliction-trilogy.mma Jonhan (talk) 22:08, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's the SAME one I put.It's a VERBAL commitment,which means NOTHING or here's another one.

http://mmajunkie.com/news/15597/with-josh-barnett-scrambling-to-clear-name-affliction-confident-in-providing-worthy-replacement.mma User:Forrestdfuller (talk) 22:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also the sherdog link also has Bobby Lashley as another person to face Fedor.So stop chaning the damn thing.Nothing is fucking offical User:Forrestdfuller (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sherdog link actually says Bobby Lashley has DENIED fighting Fedor. But you bring a good source that bolsters your claims. Jonhan (talk) 22:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protected

[edit]

Why is the article protected? Portillo (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

     Because the article was vandalised when all his losses were changed to wins.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.177.161 (talk) 07:40, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity

[edit]

Does anyone know how French and how Greek he is and if he's anything else?

Where did you hear that from? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

vs. Franklin

[edit]

Who keeps changing his win at UFC 103 over Franklin to a TKO? It was announced as a knockout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.35.67.32 (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

vs. jon jones

[edit]

he didn't replace lyoto machida in the jon jones fight on 9/22/12. machida was never officially set to fight jones. it was another example of dana white opening his mouth before the fight was official. jones bout with dan herderson was cancelled, jones was rescheduled to fight one month later and vitor was one of two guys that stepped up to take the fight.

vs. Henderson II

[edit]

Please stop changing the method from KO to TKO.

By the unified rules and regulations of mixed martial arts, the fight is deemed a KO and not a TKO when the fighter is rendered unconscious. Henderson's body was clearly limp as the head kick landed and he fell to the canvas, unconscious. The official ruling is seen in the three links below citing the official event on the UFC website, the official Sherdog event and the unified rules of Mixed Martial Arts, respectively.

-http://www.ufc.com/event/ufn-belfort-henderson -http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Dan-Henderson-195 -http://www.ufc.com/discover/sport/rules-and-regulations

The official ruling as announced in the "official decision" after the fight, during the broadcast (sanctioned by the athletic commission) was "knockout" and not "technical knockout."

Eidetic Man (talk) 16:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Vitor Belfort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Vitor Belfort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vitor Belfort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vitor Belfort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Vitor Belfort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vitor Belfort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vitor_Belfort&oldid=1256950213"