Talk:Viewpark

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scotland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I hope nobody is too offended that I changed the description from "village " to "urban development". I looked the place up on Google to verify its location and, based on the housing type and integration with surrounding areas, it doesn't look much like a village to me. Furthermore, the 1923 map shows a single building there, so it isn't a historic village. If it is officially classified as a village then please feel free to change it back. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Viewpark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141129034133/http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/browser/profile.jsp?profile=Population&mainArea=viewpark&mainLevel=Locality to http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/browser/profile.jsp?profile=Population&mainArea=viewpark&mainLevel=Locality
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.sites.google.com/site/burnheadbowlingclub/home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Tannochside be merged into Viewpark. The Tannochside article is fairly short and unreferenced, and can be dealt with in the context of a neighbouring settlement. While Tannochside is sometimes described – as in the article at present – as part of Uddingston, it is actually classed as part of the Viewpark locality for census purposes, so I would take that to be a better candidate for merging to, by official definition. Jellyman (talk) 22:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with this, and would suggest the same for Birkenshaw, North Lanarkshire? Similar article length and (lack of) importance. Also, I would consider the water tower in the image for the Tannochside article to come under the side of the road belonging to Birkenshaw. However, as has been commented in the article, the boundaries are not well defined. Crowsus (talk) 14:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge, on the grounds that Tannochside seems to have a significant independent history. For example, the Tannochside history section from St John Baptist describe Tannochsides and Uddingston as separate areas in the 19th century, and of comparable (parish) sizes. Viewpark was formed as a mid-20th century housing estate for miners. So, I'd keep it separate in support of its independent history rather than its current size. Klbrain (talk) 04:15, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Michael-Kerr.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shipsview, thanks for hunting down a citation for the information you reverted back in [1], and I won't remove it again now it is sourced. However I also made the point it was undue. This is just a single snapshot fan poll (self selected sample) of a player mentioned in the notable people section of an article about a place. The player's bio consumes nearly 15% of the prose on this page. That looks undue to me. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 10:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]