Talk:Unicum

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Spirits Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Spirits WikiProject task list: This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here. Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits: Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project. Hungary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

If you are lucky enough to find some of this, try using it for the bitters in a Manhattan (cocktail) -- tasty and spicy! — Eoghanacht ^talk 15:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does it have sugar, and is it a liqueur rather than a liquor? Badagnani 06:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Techincally, it's a type of bitters. Chevalier3 (talk) 04:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Bitters or not, it has a lot of sugar. In fact, that's the main reason that only moderate servings can be consumed. --SciCorrector (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Early camera shutter. Perhaps a bit obscure, but not so obscure that it isn't already here on Wikipedia. --Elijah (talk) 23:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know it's to be drunk in room temerature, not chill as depicted.

It can be drunk at any temperature, but it definitely is best enjoyed chilled. (Simplymo (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to these wikipedia pages Hungary, People's Republic of Hungary, Hungarian Communist Party there was a form of Communism in Hungary and the Zwack family was in exile during this period. Looks like there is a consensus on this. Until all of those pages are changed to socialism the term communism should remain on this page. MarnetteD | Talk 21:01, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The link to Goulash Communism that you provide states that this was a hybrid form of communism that did not exist until the 1960's so the country was still communist before that. Further it does not state that Hungary ever became a purely "Socialist" country. Lastly, the name of the article is "Goulash Communism for crying out loud. The term communism should be restored to the article. MarnetteD | Talk 21:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see that the original hint I gave about the common confusion of communism and socialism was not enough. I don't have time neither do I want go and change heaps of wikipedia pages therefore all of the above mentioned will stay in their original states. However, if anyone would like to have a look at the page communism it very clearly states that communism is "only possible after a socialist stage develops the productive forces, leading to a superabundance of goods and services." Since this state has never been achieved in Hungary or, in fact, anywhere in the world, communism is a word that has, erroneously, replaced socialism. So that is the end of this debate; although certain pages of wikipedia are incorrect it does not mean that the wiki community needs another page with false info. (Simplymo (talk) 14:35, 27 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Unicum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100218135322/http://unicum.hu/index.html to http://unicum.hu/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]