Talk:United States Air Force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States Air Force article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months

Article milestones Date Process Result August 3, 2006 WikiProject peer review Reviewed
	A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 18, 2012.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / National / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force National militaries task force North American military history task force United States military history task force United States: Government High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. OKWGCAP (talk · contribs) / United States Air Force This user has contributed to the article.

Try get sum warmer zones n push zoning state commission to i.e take zone 5 warm sum to get grasslnd ready for eetry agrcltr etc 96.29.162.64 (talk) 17:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• It is not clear how your comments are related to this US Air Force wiki article. Talk pages are only meant for article improvements and related activities per WP:TALK. Posts that off topic and not related to article improvement may be removed. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asthe USAF is about to retire its fleet of KC10 Entenders in-flighr refuelling aircraft, this woud be a great opportunity to convert these planes to spray water on wild fires, an improvement on the current praatcice of using helicopters, with a bucket. Thousands of pounds of water in one pass, could more efficently control wild fires as California is presently experiencing. This could also be a worldwide service, offered to all. 161.29.239.133 (talk) 03:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are really meant for article improvement (see WP:TALK#USE), not general discussion. Regards -Fnlayson (talk) 03:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The aircraft flown section of the infobox and the Armed Forces sidebar are taking up significant sections of the page space and bunching the images in particular in the Mission, vision, and functions section. They may have been non-disruptive in previous versions of wikipedia, but since it moved to the new GUI they seem to be disrupting the flow of the page.

I don't think we need the aircraft flown section since there are so many and they are covered later in the page and the Armed Forces sidebar is redundant with Template:United States Armed Forces at the bottom of the page.

I'm proposing removing either one of these or both of these to restore the flow of the page. Aerospace8672 (talk) 02:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW it renders fine for me in both Monobook and Vector; though it takes up significantly less room in Monobook, it's not unreadable or disruptive IMO in either one. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 03:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think what I'm seeing is that it's pushing the F-35 image below the Air Superiority section, which the source seems to show its suppose to be tied to. Aerospace8672 (talk) 14:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]