Talk:Transport in Belgrade

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Transport Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Serbia: Belgrade High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as high-importance).

The contents of the List of bridges in Belgrade page were merged into Transport in Belgrade on 30 March 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Would it be true to say that the old main railway is a slow deadend station, while its replacement is a faster through station; like Stuttgart? Tabletop (talk) 11:22, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Nas-taxi--wallpaper-02.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Nas-taxi--wallpaper-02.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Transport in Belgrade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110304002438/http://www.gsp.rs/english/dailylines.htm to http://www.gsp.rs/english/dailylines.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090610172857/http://www.domikoprevoz.rs/ to http://www.domikoprevoz.rs/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090412104537/http://www.port-bgd.rs/ to http://www.port-bgd.rs/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219095731/http://www.danas.rs/20060208/terazije1.html to http://www.danas.rs/20060208/terazije1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]