Talk:Tropical Storm Dean (2001)

	Tropical Storm Dean (2001) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result November 25, 2006 Good article nominee Listed May 25, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 10, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Tropical Storm Dean was one of four Atlantic hurricanes in the 2001 Atlantic hurricane season to lose their circulation and subsequently re-develop?
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Puerto Rico Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Very good! This could almost go for GAC as it stands... CrazyC83 16:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I put it for GA, in that case. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. No Point of View: Easy pass.
2. Factuality: Pass.
3. Broad: Yep. Well done here. Pass
4. Stable: Pass.
5. Well written: Passable, except for one slight problem.
6. Images: Pass

The problem: "Tropical Storm Dean was one of four Atlantic hurricanes in the 2001 Atlantic hurricane season to lose their circulation and subsequently redevelop." I'd rephrase that, as Dean was not a hurricane. For now, On Hold. Mitchazenia(7900+edits) 23:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't really sure of the first sentence when I wrote that, so I just made a new one that works. Hurricanehink (talk) 23:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, passed.Mitchazenia(7900+edits) 23:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Dean (2001). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.met.fsu.edu/pub/weather/tropical/Outlook-A/2001/Aug/2001082109.ABNT20
• Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.met.fsu.edu/pub/weather/tropical/Outlook-A/2001/Aug/2001082209.ABNT20
• Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.met.fsu.edu/pub/weather/tropical/Outlook-A/2001/Aug/2001082402.ABNT20
• Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.met.fsu.edu/pub/weather/tropical/Outlook-A/2001/Aug/2001082415.ABNT20
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205194205/http://www.weather.bm/data/2001-08.html to http://www.weather.bm/data/2001-08.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]