Talk:The Big One (Dexter)

A fact from The Big One (Dexter) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that actress Julia Stiles had no idea whether her character was going to live or die in "The Big One", the fifth season finale of the Showtime series Dexter? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/December.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Dexter / Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Dexter task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force. United States: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I am not sure how linking to a dab page is to give an idea of popularity, or why such an idea is needed in this link. If the read needs an idea of popularity, the idea should be presented in the text here (with citation for its notability), not suggested by the contents of a navigational page somewhere else. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion can be found here. Your input would be most welcome. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My input is above. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was your input about the idea of copyediting the dab page and renaming it to List of works named "Through a Glass, Darkly". Hearfourmewesique (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say that isn't going to work. The Dab page serves an important function, and needs to be there. Its function would not be eclipsed by a "List of" article. They could exist separately. The Interior(Talk) 20:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, linking to a dab page should not be done unless it's in a hat-note. Even if there would be an article "List of works named "Through a Glass, Darkly"", which would not be a replacement of the dab article, I don't believe there is a need for a link towards it. Why the need to show unrelated materials which just happen to have the same name, in this case just a working title, not even the actual title? _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 20:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone who cares should mention the fan name "Through a Glass Darkly" with a citation; otherwise, the link to this page should be removed from Through a Glass Darkly. – Fayenatic London 18:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]