Talk:TLA+

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer science High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Initially set theory is introduced as ZF, then later mentioned as ZFC. According to the ZF/set theory page, ZF and ZFC are not to be used interchangeably and thus this section is confusing. Does TLA+ use ZF or ZFC set theory?

The sentence:

Other temporal operators include weak fairness WFe(A), which means if action A is continuously enabled, it must eventually be taken; and strong fairness SFe(A), which means if action A is continually enabled, it must eventually be taken.

introduces weak and strong fairness. The difference in the definition of the operators is only the phrases continuously enabled vs. continually enabled.

The two words continuously and continually are strong synonyms. Whatever subtle difference in them (as used by TLA+) as modifiers of enabled is lost on the general reader. I believe a further distinction needs to be stated. HiTechHiTouch (talk) 09:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't synonyms but easy to confuse.[1] I've included definitions based on Lamport's explanation of the words in Specifying Systems, p. 106.--92.77.210.124 (talk) 02:00, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What does TLC stand for? Temporal Logic Checker?Sivizius (talk) 15:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]