Talk:Sumatran tiger

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indonesia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Cats High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Mammals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think it'd be better to replace SumatranTigerEating.jpg with SumatranTigerToronto.JPG. The latter was previously and erroneously used as a Bengal Tiger picture in the main Tiger article. - Slow Graffiti 21:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the IUCN link lists the population size at 250 mature individuals. The article says 400-500. Which is right? Matthias5 14:38, 1 ""4 September 2006 (UTC)

69.127.225.86 (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC) Just curious what makes an image useless enough that it has to be removed? If there are three images in the article of tigers, and one shows it sitting down, and one shows it standing up, and the other shows it eating dinner, how do you decide which one is "useless"? --Maelwys 17:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok maby "useless" is a worng word, but I think it (Image:SumatranTigerEating.jpg) is not really a good image. it is not sharp, there is a fence in the view and the tiger shows nothing, what is not shown by the tigers in the other two images.--Altaileopard 13:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In East Kalimantan live population, estimated at between 200 and 400 tigers. - "Wild Indonesia", Amushkin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agripio (talk • contribs) 06:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what map can i use to find the place where the sumatran tiger came from —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.91.35.26 (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the map under the taxobox does show the distribution, but it is impossible to see because the scale is global, but the distribution is limited to a few patches on sumatra. could someone edit it to zoom in on the area?Hectorguinness (talk) 23:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

doneAtikuX (talk) 10:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the section evolution or something there is the word 'boarder'. I'll change it to 'border'Zheliel (I know I am Pro) 23:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done.Zheliel (I know I am Pro) 23:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More sources are needed (e.g. tigers preying on wild pig, being overpowered by bears, etc.). I don't like to stick tags all over it. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 08:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article says the population is "441 to 679" and there is a downward trend. But what was the population in 1950? That information will give readers a better understanding of the trend. For example, the population of polar bears in 1950 was about 5,000. Now it is about 20,000. There are still many people who think the polar bear population is trending down. RonCram (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In Characteristics, the article says male Sumatran Tigers "measure 220 to 225 cm (87 to 89 in) in length between the pegs." If "between the pegs" is correct, it needs further explanation; right now it's confusing. Ka'upena Kuahewa (talk) 02:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was this not elevated to species level?142.176.114.76 (talk) 23:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See this. Leo1pard (talk) 05:42, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Leo1pard (talk) 15:32, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Wild Sumatran female tiger.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]