Talk:Stuffing

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

The first sentence of the history section seemed unfounded, so I removed it: "Stuffing may well be one of the oldest cooking techniques, since the body cavity of a game animal becomes suitable for stuffing as soon as its internal organs have been removed." The part following the 'since' does little to support the first part, which just seems to be base speculation.

The first sentence of "Foods that are stuffed" contains a grammatical error. I am not sure how it should be read so I can't correct it.

I see what you mean. I've changed it to "In addition to stuffing the body cavity of animals, including mammals, birds, and fish, various joints of larger animals may be stuffed after they have been deboned or a pouch has been cut into the joint."

Does that read better? Nautile 17:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another sentence that I am having trouble grasping: "Stuffing may well be one of the cooking techniques, since the body cavity of a game animal becomes suitable for stuffing as soon as its internal organs have been removed."

Should that read "one of the oldest cooking techniques" or 'fastest' or 'easiest?' It seems it needs some kind of qualifier, otherwise the sentence just refers to some vague 'cooking techniques' that we have no recollection of. Nautile 17:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"some claim" seems pretty darn weasel-y to me.Heatherfire 22:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had relatives from Germany visit me and the concept of stuffing was totally foreign to them. Is stuffing mainly an American food these days or is it common to find it in other countries as well?--DannyBoy7783 20:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a US thing at all; still very much an English institution. 89.241.229.236 12:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We also have it in France and Canada. Pro bug catcher 12:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is very much a US thing. I don't know what the person two people before me was thinking. I've lived in the MidWest and in the South, and it's "stuffing" in the MidWest and "dressing" in the South. And when it's dressing, it's maybe half bread, sometimes includes meat, and NEVER served inside anything, but it's DECIDEDLY similar. Heatherfire 22:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstood anon. He/she's saying it's an English institution in that it's something which the English popularised (which may or may not be true) and the Americans inherited it from the English (which is likely true). I.E. it's not something that Americans began which then spread. He/she's not saying it's something which isn't common in the US. Nil Einne 11:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

alternate cite for 10 bird roast:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/foodmonthly/story/0,,1660817,00.html

See also : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hugh_Fearnley-Whittingstall#10_bird_roast

I'm sorry, but Image:Legumes farcis provencaux p1040286.jpg, currently in the article, is a severely unappetizing photo of stuffing. Can someone find a better one, please? Deli nk (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

done. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 21:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should these be split?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:10, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stuffing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081109080411/http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Factsheets/Turkey_Basics_Stuffing/index.asp to http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Factsheets/Turkey_Basics_Stuffing/index.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]