Talk:Stanydale Temple

A fact from Stanydale Temple appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the discoverer of Scotland's ancient Stanydale Temple (pictured) thought it was patterned after temples in Malta? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stanydale Temple.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scottish Islands Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Charles S. T. Calder's 1949 article, "Excavation of a neolithic temple" (search it at google) explicitly discounts the driftwood possibility.--Wetman (talk) 00:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Calder in EXCAVATION OF A NEOLITHIC TEMPLE page 191-192 says "no driftwood of spruce from America is known", and points out that the roof would require a lot of wood. The cited source in turn cites Scott, Antiquity, 1951, 151-3 in saying the wood presumably was driftwood from North America. The article follows the source in saying "presumably". I do not have access to Scott's article. If another source gives more information, such as the type of spruce, that should be added. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:58, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• O.k. Norway spruce, given in Calder's paper, does have a Scandinavian sound to it. :~) Aymatth2 (talk) 02:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]