Talk:Shadowmancer

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Fantasy task force. Yorkshire Low‑importance Shadowmancer is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Children's literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks you can do: edit history watch purge Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks. Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles. Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}} Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project. Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject. References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs. Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature Stubs: Improve a stub-class article edit

I removed nicenhappy's addition about Shadowmancer selling more copies in its first week than Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix as this is clearly not correct: both were published in the same week in June 2003 and Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix exceeded all sales records:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/3005862.stm — Preceding unsigned comment added by by 217.34.49.234 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 26 January 2006

According to this BBC News page (already ref'd?) the book out-sold everything other than J K Rowling. This is probably worth mentioning in the article.

EdJogg (talk) 23:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind me tweaking a few things here and there. Also the inclusion of the Shadowmancer movie website and the bit about the Shadowmancer ending/Wormwood beginning paragraph in Trivia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.80.92 (talk • contribs) Revision as of 20:02, 12 November 2006

The Keruvim aren't amulets, but artefact's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grotewittebeer (talk • contribs) 15:45, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shadowmancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090622092947/http://www.shadowmancer.com/shadowmancer_latest_news.htm to http://www.shadowmancer.com/shadowmancer_latest_news.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]