[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

Talk:SSC Napoli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleSSC Napoli was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 28, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 11, 2018Good article reassessmentKept
June 10, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Scudetti

[edit]

It was Maradona who put Napoli on the world soccer map, leading them to two scudetti

The word scudetti needs some context or explanation. Tintin Talk 02:02, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer or Calcio?

[edit]

Is it Napoli Soccer or Napoli Calcio, since they dont call it soccer in Italy, they call it Calcio. For example, Cagliari Calcio, not Cagliari Soccer.

SSC Napolo

[edit]

Could someone please verify where the name, "SSC Napolo" came from. I don't believe this is correct.

It's S.S.C Napoli

Requested move

[edit]

Napoli Soccer → S.S.C. Napoli – see article for explaination CapPixel 13:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
  • Support - If Napoli will be called SSC Napoli then name change is correct.
  • Support - I'll change it now... seen as that is the clubs official name, not Napoli Soccer. - Deathrocker 21:05, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
Add any additional comments

The name of the club is officially S.S.C. Napoli from 23 May... See my last modification on the page. Excuse me for my bad english.

Template

[edit]

I've created a template for the current team players here; Template:S.S.C. Napoli squad, so if there are any squad changes or number changes it will need to be updated there too. - Deathrocker 23:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

[edit]

Shouldn't this only be called Società Sportiva Calcio Napoli on the Italian wiki? Bigdottawa 04:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Potential GA

[edit]

With a few more sources this article might be easily eligible to pass a Good Article review. --Angelo 02:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

this is the new logo of ssc napoli: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immagine:Napolistemma.png

Actually, the one already in the article is correct. See the badges featured on the new 2007-08 official football kits.[1] - The Daddy 12:10, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passed GA

[edit]

Well done the article has passed for a Good Article. NapHit 11:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ACNapoliLogo.PNG

[edit]

Image:ACNapoliLogo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rivalries?

[edit]

How can Juventus, Inter, Milan, Atalanta, and Livorno be excluded? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.219.85 (talk) 07:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naples and Palermo are not rival fans; on the contrary, they have always been good allies. In recent years, a small part of the fan base has moved away from this friendship because a part of the Palermo fans are friends with the Roma fans (Napoli's historical rivals). Erase this serious mistake! You can find confirmation of what I say in the following Italian newspaper articles:
https://www.ilpost.it/2023/01/09/gemellaggi-ostilita-ultras-squadre-italiane/
https://www.parlamentoduesicilie.eu/wordpress/il-blog/gemellaggio-napoli-palermo-esiste-da-900-anni/
https://www.spazionapoli.it/2016/03/13/foto-gemellaggio-tra-tifosi-di-palermo-e-napoli-scena-bellissima/ 37.163.11.205 (talk) 17:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Photo

[edit]

Napoli moved to the new Stadio San Paolo in 1959, where they have played since. the photo is false, it is seen Toyota Yaris, you will change the text under the photo

Co founder William Potths

[edit]

there ae doubts about his name, it seems it's Potts or Potths or... somebody can find sources where there is written his real name? The only thing we know is he worked at Cunard company...93.33.1.46 (talk) 17:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Away kit

[edit]

Away kit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dipralb (talk • contribs) 15:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This is the real logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.98.164.229 (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the records and statistics section

[edit]

For now the "records and statistics section" actually only encompasses two of the main statistics about players, yet there are many more relevant statistics for a football club. Instead of linking to List of S.S.C. Napoli players, it should link to a more complete article, like this one about Aston Villa or this about Liverpool, just to cite two very well-made ones. After all a club's statistics is not its list of players.

So my proposal is: Leave everything as it is, maybe cutting down the number of players per stat in the table and adding a couple more important ones in the textual part, but using the {{main}} template to link to List of S.S.C. Napoli records and statistics, which I plan to create with the help of the corresponding article on it.wiki (and hoping to make a pretty decent article if sources allow it). Then it would only be a problem of where to put the existing {{main|List of S.S.C. Napoli players}} template.

I think it is a better solution than having anyone who searches for the detailed statistics only find the list of players (the Napoli template Statistics wikilink actually links to that section too). Hoping to establish some kind of consensus. Zidanie5 (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I waited for three days with no answer, so I proceeded. I merely changed the {{main|List of S.S.C. Napoli players}} template in the Statistics section to {{main|List of S.S.C. Napoli records and statistics}}, an article I created here. I think it is more specific to what the section is about, and List of S.S.C players was already linked a couple of sections before that. If anyone does not agree with the change, let's talk about it. Zidanie5 (talk) 16:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

As this is supposed to be a good article, why can't I find on the page links to the specific season subpages of the team? For instance 2012–13 S.S.C. Napoli season. Sander.v.Ginkel (Je suis Charlie) 23:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on S.S.C. Napoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:39, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on S.S.C. Napoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on S.S.C. Napoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on S.S.C. Napoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on S.S.C. Napoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on S.S.C. Napoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on S.S.C. Napoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2 "Out on Loan" Sections

[edit]

There appears to be two separate "out on loan" sections. Is this deliberate? 73.88.58.38 (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ref name changes

[edit]

@Geolojoey: I'm not sure exactly what happened, but last month you made an edit that changed a bunch of ref names that ended in "2" to end in "22", which broke at least one of them. Could you please resolve that? -- Fyrael (talk) 20:23, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fyrael: Should be fixed now, not sure why that happened. Geolojoey (talk) 21:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:A.C. Milan which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

SSC Napoli

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: No signs of improvement after 1 week. 48JCL TALK 02:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19 CN tags. Whole sections unsourced. How has this not gone noticed? 48JCLTALK 00:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:SSC_Napoli&oldid=1228218614"