[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Rocket Science (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRocket Science (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 13, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 27, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Jeffrey Blitz wrote Rocket Science based on his own adolescence despite claiming to be "allergic" to autobiographical films?

Goofs

[edit]

Should this section be so prominent on the page? It kind of gives away part of the movie by telling you that he's disqualified from being on the debate team. NobleArc (talk) 04:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination

[edit]

I've withdrawn the GA nom for now as I plan to add a third "Design" section under Production, covering cinematography, production design, colour schemes, costume design, and any other aspects contributing to the overall "look" of the film. I did add in "Themes" while the article was in the GAN queue but it's very near to the top, and I don't want to (a) rush to get the section done before or during the GA review or (b) have the article promoted to GA without the section. —97198 (talk) 12:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that explains it. Well good luck with the article. :) Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 13:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated again. —97198 (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How convenient! Just in time for.... :P Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 03:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rating section

[edit]

Hello, great article here! I was wondering, though, if the ratings box was really necessary. The paragraph about the dispute about the R rating is terrific, but when it comes to the box, the certificates are more indiscriminate. The box is usually discouraged because of this, especially because the certificates in the box can't reflect the reasons or any commentary attached to it. —Erik (talkcontrib) 17:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A fair point, especially considering that there are only three countries' ratings. I've gone and removed it. :) —97198 (talk) 00:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Rocket Science (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Rocket Science (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]