Talk:Rome Prize

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Awards Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Italy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

Is this related to Yaddo? Badagnani (talk) 08:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To the best of my knowledge, no. The AAR likes to talk a lot about its early history, and I don't remember Yaddo ever coming up. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 20:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok i added links to comprehensive lists, i believe the "2011" people are really 2010. Pohick2 (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Thanks for adding the lists), but in answer to this speciffNo -- the problem is that the 2011 fellows are announced in early 2010 (the residency year begins in the fall but the academic class is always the following year when the Fellows "graduate"). Somewhere around 2009 the dates on the subpages get mixed up; I know all the music fellows and they're listed with the right year at least until 2008, but after that they seem incorrect (Keeril Makan is definitely 2009 and Don Byron is definitely 2010, for instance). The other issue with the lists is that they conflate Fellows (=Rome Prize winners; people generally in the earlier stages of their careers) with Residents (selected by invitation, usually in later stages; they are technically not Fellows of the AAR nor Rome Prize winners [though several residents were former fellows]). There are also Visiting Artists (famously including Leonard Nimoy as a photographer) and Visiting Scholars who tend not to appear on any official AAR lists. Thanks! -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC) (FAAR '05)[reply]

i believe that David Charles Randolph (1996 musical composition) is really David Charles Randolph Rakowski, and i will change to David Rakowski per [1], but if you know otherwise please change back. Accotink2 talk 00:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, the addition of Fellows lists here to the main page is getting a little out of hand, in my opinion -- is the point of listing fellows here to eventually duplicate the entire lists of fellows on the sub pages? My suggestion is to have a single paragraph of the 10-20 most prominent people ever to win the prize and the link prominently to the sub lists. If some disciplines want their own comprehensive lists, they can be sub pages as well. As it is, there are whole disciplines (Renaissance, Modern Italian Studies, etc.) that have no listings on the main page, prominent winners in other disciplines not listed (e.g., Anthony Doerr who just won the Pulitzer Prize, and then other disciplines where it looks like everyone who has got the prize is being added. A lot of recentism too. Thanks! -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to be bold and remove all -- there are comprehensive links on the other pages where they belong. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 20:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20061202225547/http://www.aarome.org:80/prize.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:45, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]