Talk:Richard Branson

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Richard Branson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 180 days

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. James Bond (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject James Bond, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.James BondWikipedia:WikiProject James BondTemplate:WikiProject James BondJames Bond articles Spaceflight Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Biography This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aerospace biography project. Travel and Tourism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Comics: Creators / British Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Related work groups: /  This article is supported by Comics creators work group. This article is supported by British comics work group. Dyslexia (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dyslexia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DyslexiaWikipedia:WikiProject DyslexiaTemplate:WikiProject DyslexiaDyslexia articles Disability Richard Branson is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: ""Rebel" joins reality race Fox, Branson take flight". The Denver Post. November 8, 2004.

Richard Branson was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. Review: September 18, 2006.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: July 11 to 17, 2021

MOS:OPENPARABIO: One, or possibly more, noteworthy positions, activities, or roles that the person held, avoiding subjective or contentious terms. ... However, try to not overload the first sentence by describing everything notable about the subject) Since when is Branson notable for making one trip into space? Where are the sources calling him a "commercial astronaut" in the first place? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The FAA awards commercial astronaut wings to people who meet these criteria:^[1]

"To be eligible for Astronaut Wings, nominees have to meet the following criteria and submit an application to the FAA: – Must be an FAA licensed launch; – Must meet the requirements for flight crew qualifications and training under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 460; and – Must demonstrate flight beyond 50 statute miles above the surface of the Earth as flight crew on an FAA licensed or permitted launch reentry vehicle."

The launch was licensed by the FAA, the crew were trained and they flew above 50 statute miles. They were awarded Commercial Astronaut Wings shortly after their landing. --Jrcraft Yt (talk) 20:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having an award by the FAA doesn't mean Wikipedia policies for opening paragraph inclusion are met. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One, or possibly more, noteworthy positions, activities, or roles that the person held, avoiding subjective or contentious terms.

This was heavily covered by media and has been in the works for 17 years. --Jrcraft Yt (talk) 20:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your question was "[Is] Branson now a commercial astronaut?" the answer to that is yes. --Jrcraft Yt (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:INDENT. The questions were in the OP -- Since when is Branson notable for making one trip into space? Where are the sources calling him a "commercial astronaut" in the first place? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Branson is not an astronaut because he hasn't reached Earth orbit and did not orbit it at least once, or did not get further. But can be considered a commercial astronaut. Jirka.h23 (talk) 19:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to orbit to become an astronaut. That's only your opinion. --Jrcraft Yt (talk) 02:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Association of Space Explorers (ASE) only accepts individuals who have completed at least one orbit of the Earth. Jirka.h23 (talk) 05:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that he's not famous for that. Going to space, as cool as it is, is not what he's known for. Of course he/his group owns Virgin Galactic, but that's already included in his business activities. We should not give him all the titles/positions associated with his ventures. Litteul (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I bet he won't even get a Romanian stamp, like Laika the orbital dog. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How did we drag stamps into this?2A02:2F08:B10C:7800:DD33:67BE:C0D5:8178 (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leave out from MOS:OPENPARABIO is my recommendation. He may be a commercial astronaut now, but that's not what he is notable for, but rather how he chose to spend his earnings from his main roles. It can still be mentioned later in the article. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: He flew in space once, and it's part of the venture he invested in, not his profession. Therefore it should not be mentioned in the first paragraph. Sgnpkd (talk) 16:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Agree, should not be in first paragraph and certainly not in those terms. I'm not even sure that whole last paragraph is justified. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this standard be consistent for anyone that flew in the Blue Origin flight? Currently both Bezos and Funk have commercial astronaut in their first sentences; based on the definition set forth by the FAA. Seems very inconsistent to not use it on Branson because that's not what he's famous for, when compared to Bezos.

The FAA has updated their policy for who qualifies as an astronaut. Branson and Bezos no longer qualify for astronaut wings under them. Hbk1966 (talk) 10:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is the use of the phrase "space tourist" in the first sentence still contentious? If not, why do we need the two sources there? In fact, why do we also need the additional four sources in the final paragraph of the lead? These should all be just in the article main body? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC) p.s. if he rode once on the The Big One in Blackpool would we describe him as "business magnate, investor, author, and roller coaster rider"?[reply]

Yes, it's not his occupation. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 09:04, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The lede is to make it clear what the subject is famous for and why they have a wiki article. He is in no way famous for being an astronaut, it does not belong there. Ashmoo (talk) 15:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"In July 2021, Branson became the first billionare in space after beating Jeff Bezos by a couple of weeks. " (Billionaire appears to be missing the 3rd i)

Charles Simonyi paid his way to the ISS twice, in 2007 & 2009. He is now worth $5 billion. Guy Laliberté paid his way the the ISS in 2009, after selling 90% of Cirque du Soleil for $1.5 billion (CAD?)

Yep. Charles Simonyi is worth US$5 billion. And Guy Laliberté was worth US$1.2 billion last June. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Branson (and Bezos) is decades late to the party and hundreds of miles/km short of orbit of other billionaires, from the early 21st century -- 64.229.90.53 (talk) 02:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No matter how you do the maths, these convoluted superlatives are not encyclopediac and do not belong here. Ashmoo (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the promise of an out-of-this-world trip, all that happened was 15 minutes in near space. So, instead of highlighting a list of public relations stuns, might not the article take a closer look at some of the Branson's attempts at a star trek? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.75.125 (talk) 20:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it WP:UNDUE to talk about a conviction in the early 70s in the opening sentence? Park3r (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree, as it was in 1971 and he spent only one night in jail. I guess it's been put there for dramatic effect. It really is not a defining characteristic, with or without any source (that really should not be needed in the first sentence). I suggest it's removed. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]