Talk:Received Pronunciation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Received Pronunciation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 6 months

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. BBC Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary) Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article. England High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. British Empire This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Commonwealth This article is within the scope of WikiProject Commonwealth, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Commonwealth of Nations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CommonwealthWikipedia:WikiProject CommonwealthTemplate:WikiProject CommonwealthCommonwealth articles English Language Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from File:Phonetic and phonemic transcriptions of audio record of Received Pronunciation.jpg. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2014022210011201. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

The contents of the Conservative Received Pronunciation page were merged into Received Pronunciation on 6 October 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

I see that the term "The Queen's/King's English" has been reinstated in the lead after being removed yesterday. I see also that the author has cited the British Library paper on RP that seems, unfortunately, to have become the standard reference on RP (apart, of course, from the Wikipedia article itself). I can't object to this paper being quoted, but for the record, I have never heard "The Queen's/King's English" used to refer specifically to Received Pronunciation, and I believe the BL paper is wrong to suggest that it is a proper term to use in this context. RoachPeter (talk) 08:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the definition of "Queen's English" in some dictionaries:

• Oxford English Dictionary: "the English language regarded as under the guardianship of the Queen; hence, standard or correct English"
• Cambridge Dictionary: "the English language as it is spoken in the south of England, considered by some people as a standard of good English"
• Merriam-Webster: "standard, pure, or correct English speech or usage[;] king's english —used especially when the British monarch is a queen"
• American Heritage Dictionary: "English speech or usage that is considered standard or accepted"

If major dictionaries can be trusted this looks like evidence that the term doesn't specifically refer to an accent. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 11:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge's definition sounds like RP though, no? And even the cited British Library source says "Popular terms for this accent, such as 'the Queen's English' ... are all a little misleading". So naming it as an alternative term without much contextualization, as done in the current version of the article, is indeed misleading, but I don't think it hurts to mention that the term(s) can refer to the accent, preferably in the "Alternative names" section. Nardog (talk) 11:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• To suggest that London is in the South Midlands borders on silly. The angle which is lacking on the page is the effect of education. It would be more true to say that RP is spoken by most southerners and many others who have had higher education. The other thing I wanted to raise is that the effect of radio and television has been to spread RP in Britain simply because the BBC has had such a dominance of the spoken word in our society. Regional accents have withered in comparison. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  “RP spoken by most southerners” is laughable. The south and south east has a variety of accents (as does London) and the vast majority of people speak with accents that sound absolutely nothing like RP. You could say most RP speakers are in the south east, but most people in the south east have their own distinct non RP accents. 81.99.178.220 (talk) 08:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was mildly surprised to see that the spread of RP and the creation of mass media/BBC has not really been made here. RP is/was the regional form of English of those in charge, and with the advent of mass communication the strength of the other regional varieties have weakened, even more so now with the web and the adoption of many American phrases/words/pronunciations etc.Halbared (talk) 10:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nowadays it's called RP English 94.31.86.250 (talk) 13:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article makes it sound as though SSB is merely a modern update of RP, but both of these separate forms exist now. Much has been written about the differences between RP and SSB. I recommend we begin a new article for SSB.Ordinary Person (talk) 11:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any evidence for your claim? RoachPeter (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The symbols given in the "Alternative notation" section are claimed to come from this source: "Case Studies – Received Pronunciation Phonology – RP Vowel Sounds". British Library.. However, this is clearly not the case (or no longer so). Can someone verify where these symbols are really coming from? Is it Upton? Wolfdog (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have just reverted a contribution adding "cut-glass", on the grounds that this is an adjective rather than a name, and that the proposal is not backed up by a substantial reference. While looking again at Alternative Names I was reminded that the current final piece of the section, on Marghanita Laski and "Gentry", is barely relevant and somewhat ambivalent. Does anyone want to argue for its retention? RoachPeter (talk) 19:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]