Talk:Reaganing

	Reaganing has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result November 23, 2010 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Fordham University#The Fordham Ram|The Fordham Ram]] Anchor Fordham University#The Fordham Ram links to a specific web page: The Fordham Ram. The anchor (#The Fordham Ram) has been deleted by other users before. [[Fordham University#The Fordham Ram|The Ram]] Anchor Fordham University#The Fordham Ram links to a specific web page: The Fordham Ram. The anchor (#The Fordham Ram) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reaganing/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 97198 (talk) 14:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is looking really good at the moment, and I only found a few minor things to nitpick:

• According to the Nielsen Media Research - can we lose the "the"?
  • Removed. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• The repeated takes to accommodate Tracy are what is holding the traffic up - I haven't seen the episode, but can you clarify why exactly this is affecting the traffic?
  • The commercial shoot is blocking off a street, in which Jack and Liz are, and because Tracy can't remember his line the production is getting delayed thus the traffic jam occurring. Or in other words, "Tracy becomes the new spokesperson for the 'Boys & Girls Club' but has difficulty remembering his lines while filming a commercial. The commercial is filmed at a city block, but the director begins to panic as they don't have enough funds to keep the city block closed. Tracy needs to get his lines right, and quickly."
• Carvel thanked the show for referencing them in the episode despite making them "the butt of of the joke" and that the Carvel subplot "was pretty funny stuff!" - seems to be a verb missing before "that"
  • I think I got it.
• Penton revealed that she auditioned - misspelling of "Ponton"; also, "revealed" sounds a bit sensationalist for such a small detail
  • Oh snap, I can't believe I missed that. I fixed the misspelling and removed revealed.

I'll place the review on hold for a week to give you time to make any changes before it gets passed (not that it will take you long). Great work, as always. :) 97198 (talk) 14:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, 97198, I appreciate it very much. I hope I addressed all your concerns, if not I'll do whatever it takes. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making those changes, and for the clarification about Tracy's commercial, but would you be able to work that into the plot in the article? 97198 (talk) 08:12, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my late response, have been dealing with computer problems. Anyways, I did my best with the Tracy plot, IDK if it reads well or whatever. If not, let me know and I'll try to fix it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:07, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That looks great, so I'll pass the GAN. Nice work! 97198 (talk) 05:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Reaganing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tv.com/season-5-spoilers/webnews/105121.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101024190643/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/22/thursday-finals-greys-anatomy-big-bang-csi-adjusted-up-private-practice-down-plus-nlcs-game-5-ratings/69266 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/22/thursday-finals-greys-anatomy-big-bang-csi-adjusted-up-private-practice-down-plus-nlcs-game-5-ratings/69266
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101017022226/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/15/thursday-finals-the-big-bang-theory-30-rock-the-office-outsourced-greys-anatomy-fringe-all-adjusted-up/68224 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/15/thursday-finals-the-big-bang-theory-30-rock-the-office-outsourced-greys-anatomy-fringe-all-adjusted-up/68224
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717023956/http://www.theramonline.com/culture/ram-review/ram-review-30-rock-reaganing-episode-1.2384402 to http://www.theramonline.com/culture/ram-review/ram-review-30-rock-reaganing-episode-1.2384402

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]