Talk:Quasar

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Astronomy: Astronomical objects Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (September 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Archives

Archive for 2004 Archive for 2005 Archive for 2006 Archive for 2007 Archive for 2008 Archive for 2009 Archive for 2010 Archive for 2011 Archive for 2012 Archive for 2013 Archive for 2014 Archive for 2015 Archive for 2016

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Hi there, in the quasars article it says: "31.7 billion light-years away" but in the linked article about UHZ1 it says "UHZ1 is at a distance of 13.2 billion light-years" Could it be a Typo? Bye! 2A02:2454:8628:E300:DD04:6F54:9840:36F (talk) 06:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It could also be that 31.7 billion ly is how far away it is now due to its motion away from us and the expansion of the universe, as opposed to the distance its light has traveled to reach us (13.2 billion ly). See, for example, https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/02/23/if-the-universe-is-13-8-billion-years-old-how-can-we-see-46-billion-light-years-away/. A graph there does indeed show a current distance of roughly 30 billion ly for something at z=9.6, which corresponds to something we currently see at 13.2 billion ly. If this is the case it would be good explain it in the article. DKMell (talk) 18:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that there are different distance measures in cosmology, and a statement like this lacks essential information if it doesn't specify whether the listed distance is a luminosity distance, a light-travel time distance, etc. In general I think it is better not to list distances in this way at all, but instead to specify the look-back time, or the age of the universe when the light we currently observe from the object was emitted. Aldebarium (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]