Talk:QAPF diagram

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Volcanoes Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Geology Low‑importance Talk:QAPF diagram is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I wrote "peridotites, pyroxenites" but it was expanded to "peridotites, dunites and pyroxenites". Problem is that dunite is already one of peridotites. It's a similar situation if I write vegetables and fruits and it is changed to vegetables, apples and fruits. Problem is minor but exists nevertheless. Siim 14:08, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any template to force these references to start with their own row? In Estonian wiki we have it, see: et:Mall:BrClear. Current solution is not good. Siim 19:59, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - took me a while to find it though, ( <br clear="all"> ) did the trick - I think. The page looked fine on my low resolution screen, but I do understand the problem and hopefully it is fixed now. Vsmith 03:11, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's a little rankling that the Footnote that's labeled "IUGS" actually goes to a CSU Pomona Web page that cites no peer-reviewed research nor seems to have undergone peer review or endorsement by IUGS itself. Would it be possible to replace the Footnote link to Pomona Web page with a link to an actual IUGS page, add citations to the Pomona page, or change footnote to another more rigorous citation? Thirdbeach (talk) 23:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find a direct link to the IUGS except for the minutes of an executive committee meeting in January 1999 [1] which records the decision of the IUGS to associate themselves with Roger Le Maitre's new book (reference added) on Igneous rock classification. Hope that helps. Mikenorton (talk) 11:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All four diagrams are blank. I think the problem must be with the .gif files. Last change was 9/21/2013, must have happened sometime after that. Not sure what to do to fix it. Wwheaton (talk) 02:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Appears they were deleted from commons on 6 Sept. 2013 for lack of permission. See here. Vsmith (talk) 02:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested that a geological diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

• 
  This diagram is in German, but you don't need to know German to translate it (can copy from other image)
• 
  This diagram is in English, but as it is not an SVG, removing the highlighting would be more difficult.
• 
  ...and something in the sumptuous style of Antonio Ciccolella would be amazing (this diagram of his is for intrusive rocks).

Is anyone willing to translate/modify to give us a diagram for extrusive rocks again? HLHJ (talk) 03:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]