Talk:Populonia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Italy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Based on a statement by Servius long after the prehistoric foundation, this view was shown to be mythical by Luisa Banti, 1973. The tombs at Volterra are different, Populonia was contemporaneous and more populous. Similarly there is no sign of the Corsicans supposed to have founded the city. Article needs notes. Back to sleep now. Zzz.Dave (talk) 11:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's no Populonium, unless perchance a new element was discovered.Dave (talk) 02:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was wrong. The Romans used three different forms (unabridged Latin dictionary). I will try to make up for this.Dave (talk) 11:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I should think you'd want to say something about the lower town and the metals industry. Then you might want to mention the park and to expand on the necropoleis, of which there are several. A bit more mention of the Roman town and its fate in the 1st century BC would be appropriate. A proper notes section with references in cite book and cite web format would be helpful.Dave (talk) 14:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All right. As no one is inclined to take it up I will start doing some work on it. Feel free to jump in.Dave (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Minor FYI. Necropolis cannot be used as a plural in either English or Italian. The most scholarly use the Greek plural necropoleis. The English might say necropolises. In Italian it's invariant, necropoli. Since this is manifestly a Greek word, not made cryptic by anglicisation, it presents a puzzle to the English speaker usually solved with a nose-in-the-air necropoleis, in the air because you are educated enough to know the Greek plural, and are not just a bull-headed, know-nothing country boy from backwoods wherever. You can say necropoleis just like them city slickers, and with pride because you secretly know that although you may seem to be a fool you can put on the dog just like anyone else. Such are the ins and outs of English. But if you use necropolis as a plural you look like a just plain pimply-faced ignoramus, of the sort who pretends to be a PhD on WP, to be ignored as not even worth talking to by responsible adults, or as one of them foreigners who can't even talk the king's English. So, I suggest you quit insisting on putting necropolis in as a plural.Dave (talk) 09:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I never liked putting in Britannica 1911 word-for-word and especially not without identification. It puts blah in instead of nothing so's you can get donation money, but it isn't the responsible thing to do. In this case all the archaeological and scholarly discoveries concerning Populonia have taken existence since 1911. The 1911 article has been useless for some time now. Seeing that I am building up up the article along modern lines I am just going to drop the offhand views of our ancestors. I put a link to Wikisource if anyone should take the time to put the 1911 article in there.Dave (talk) 09:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Populonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722065806/http://w3.uniroma1.it/archeologia/Ricerche/GBartoloni/ric2.htm to http://w3.uniroma1.it/archeologia/Ricerche/GBartoloni/ric2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Populonia walls.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]