Talk:Pancake machine

The good article status of this article is being reassessed by the community to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page. Date: 16:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Pancake machine has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 9, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Pancake machine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that a completely automated pancake machine was invented in Portland, Oregon, in 1928? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pancake machine.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pancake machine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dharmadhyaksha (talk · contribs) 04:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will start the review of this article and do minor corrections myself. Will come back with other points here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• All images are from Commons and properly licensed
• No disambiguation links found
• No copyvios likely from Earwig's Copyvio Detector
• Please add Category:Cooking appliances.

•  Done. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Time required for making pancakes should be mentioned for some machines. For example, Vendo's machine made it in 3 minutes as per the source. See if data for some others is also available.

•  Done. See diff, diff, diff. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The Kiwanis machine makes 750 to 1000 pancakes per hour. Did you skip mentioning it because it actually was just a hot plate and required 4 people to run it?

• I have expanded the article to include more content about this particular machine (diff). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Please add "as of 2014" to 7000 machines sold sentence.

•  Done. Added: "and as of July 2014" North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• If am not wrong, "semi automatic" should be "semi-automatic".

• Y I agree. Changed to "semi-automatic" in article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The article nowhere mentions any reviews of these specific machines or just pancakes machines in general. There might be some chefs, food critics, food writers who have written about quality of these machines. Something on those lines would be better to include.

• Y Reviews for commercial machines are not readily found, but I have added some review information for consumer models (diff). I hesitate to add more, because I don't want the article to resemble a shopper's guide in any manner, shape or form. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Sizes of commercial pancake machines might be difficult to mention and also quite varying for being custom made. But for home-use machines approximate sizes can be mentioned.

•  Done. See diff. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• In-line with above point, and being a machine, some technical aspects needs to be covered in the article. We are so used to electricity that we have missed mentioning the basic thing that this is an electric powered machine we are talking about. Others aspects to be covered would be like power ratings and heating techniques used (Induction heater or Resistive heating or whatever).

• Sources may not be readily available to fulfill aspects of this request. I couldn't find any information about power ratings. Regarding heating techniques, there is some information in the article: "... a heated conveyor inside of a box unit", "... cook both sides of a pancake simultaneously", "It was a semi-automatic machine that performed all of the cooking functions except for ...". I have also added some content clarifying the electrical nature of the products (diff, diff). Most of the available reliable sources do not expound upon the technical electrical elements of the machines (see example source searches below). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

•  Done @Northamerica1000: Its fine if no information is available.

• Last point. Seems that commercially and popularly, simple pancake batter dispensers are also known as "pancake machines". See this product on Amazon for example. This could be mentioned somewhere. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:59, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know. That seems like a marketing ploy / original research how a person chose to describe a simple electric mixer on their Amazon listing to make something simple sound like a neat gadget and encourage higher sales volume. One could get the same result using Tupperware and a blender. I don't think this fits into the scope of the article, because it's just a blender. Perhaps this could be mentioned in the electric mixer article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your statement. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The six good article criteria checks

The article is well written and good job @Northamerica1000:. Congratulations for the new GA!! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

• The history section stops at 1956. While other sections of the article mention other events and products, I think the history section should be updated with more information or the prose in the article reformatted.
• There doesn't seem to be any post-2015 information.
• The last paragraph in "History" is uncited
• The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article.

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 04:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result pending

The history section stops at 1956. While other sections of the article mention other events and products, I think the history section should be updated with more information or the prose in the article reformatted. Additional sources could also be looked for. There doesn't seem to be any post-2015 information anywhere in the article. The last paragraph in "History" is uncited, and the lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]