Talk:Online News Association

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please convert the lists of people embedded links into either citations or remove them. It is making the article look too much like a directory. The scholarship recipients do not need to be named individually with so many entires. Also the list of venues for the camps is excessive. It should be condensed into paragraphs summarizing the number of venues and locations spanned (United States and Canada, Europe, etc.) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That certainly seems to be the main problem here. All the entries of people who do not have their own page at the moment should be deleted. There's also the question of how much one should rely on primary sources/those directly associated with the subject for such lists. The article is lacking citations in general, but still definitely seems to qualify for notability, so it shouldn't be deleted. Donkey Hot-day (talk) 11:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]