A1: Well, legally and officially, yes. We also acknowledge the sentimental connection to Cory Monteith's date of death. But while the infobox parameter does say "date of death", it should be filled by (and displays) the day a person died. According to many sources, Rivera's death certificate – while saying July 13, 2020 – acknowledges she died on July 8, 2020. So, biologically, no. Furthermore, the Television Academy and British Academy give the date as July 8, 2020.
Q2: Why does the article mention her funeral/resting place if it was private?
A2: Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and intends to respectfully document such details. Though the funeral was not reported on for several days, it did receive widespread media coverage by the end of July 2020 and so there are no WP:BLPPRIVACY concerns about including the information.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Naya Rivera was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that actress Naya Rivera from the musical comedy series Glee had a talent agent before she was even one year old?
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 10,289,088 views.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Smooth Criminal#Glee version|''Glee'' cast feat. 2Cellos version]] The anchor (#Glee version) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Doo Wop (That Thing)#Cover versions and samples|Doo Wop (That Thing)]] The anchor (#Cover versions and samples) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article was created or improved during the following events hosted by the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
She still enjoyed boating as an adult and took many trips to Lake Piru near her home, which she considered a "sanctuary".
In this article, all the punctuation marks go outside quotation marks. The article is supposed to be in American English, isn't it? Isn't it a rule of thumb that commas and periods should be inside the quotation marks? Just wanted to make sure before I mindlessly suggest an edit replacing them all. Iopezlove (talk) 16:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
At no time while she was alive did Naya Rivera ever get a sound spelling for her name. Naya is also the name of a bottled water brand, Rivera we know from people like Geraldo. Again, at no time in her life did she get a sound spelling, but according to Wikipedia logic, the more famous you are, the higher the likelihood people will have in not being able to pronounce your name correctly. Get rid of it NOW! The condescension of thus website is horrid!--67.86.58.61 (talk) 00:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And, honestly, the amount of reports on her death mispronouncing her last name was more than expected. 'Naya', despite similarity to 'Maya', is an uncommon name in English and that leads to confusion. Just because you can say it doesn't mean it gets excluded - like Cory Monteith has IPA, despite that seeming easier. Imagine if everything that one person thought was common knowledge was excluded from an encyclopedia. Kingsif (talk) 10:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As for it only appearing after death - yes, more people come to improve articles then, and a source about the pronunciation appeared then. Almost like people want to be sure it's correct more when a person isn't around to correct it. Kingsif (talk) 10:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
After someone added a paragraph on the Sep. 11 toxicology report, which I removed as UNDUE (then added details of, thinking that having the "no evidence of intoxication" line may be challenged if some details are completely omitted), I looked at the section further and felt that it was probably too much detail on what is effectively an event (Rivera's death) that, yes, is of massive importance to the subject, but should still be treated like one event among many. As it's not her primary notability, having every detail of the event rather than just the most pertinent details (or a very trimmed version as would be appropriate for the death sections of other bios), is also undue. So I made Draft:Death of Naya Rivera (a little slip-up in making it through AfC, but it will likely be put in article space soon). This also helps because the article is very long (a lot of the bytes come from tables taking up more html space, but it's not a short article). When the draft becomes an article, the section on Rivera's death will need to be trimmed and possibly reworked. I'll probably do this, too, but please add any input! Kingsif (talk) 20:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm a pretty inexperienced editor and I only come every now and then when I see a comma in the wrong place or something, but I read over your article and I just wanted to say that I think it's a good idea to replace the section with it; it's getting really long compared to other equally significant parts of the main article. Quick question though, Josey is five now, so shouldn't you guys be specifying his age to "then-four-year-old"? Or is it just implied because we're talking about events that happened back in July? MLRXSE (talk) 05:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the support and, yes, because it's talking about an "event" on a fixed day the age is presumed to be on that day. If it were more vaguely talking about a period in someone's life, "then-" is often added. Kingsif (talk) 11:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In the article there is a picture of 2Cellos, a group that is famous in Croatia, who was never certified outside Croatia, but did record some songs with a few notable artists, including Rivera. I don't understand the use of a picture of them here. Can someone explain it to me? The article is about Rivera.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 09:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's in the section that focuses on her music career, she recorded two singles with them, why not illustrate the act? Same as there's a photo of her ex in the relationship section. The text talks about people, and there's a photo to identify. Kingsif (talk) 14:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think the picture is unnecessary because it doesn't depict them and Rivera. Personally, I love 2cellos, but the fact is they aren't as famous as Rivera in the US imo (not as yet anyway), so their pictures here isn't even "to Rivera's advantage." I was going to say we might as well include a picture of Big Sean, I just saw it's already there, and that they were in a relationship too, so maybe that's okay. They had a bond that goes beyond recording two songs together.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 21:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
